Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree and I can see the BPA/IPC shoving their new single Code under the noses of the new ministers saying don't waste any more time with your code use ours.
    • Sadly I think the fault les with the parking rogues who do not want te Act to come into force and are doing everything to fight and stall it.
    • Hopgarden I have problems understanding your PCNs. On Post 5 you said that you had received a PCN  dated  26th May 2021 received on the 1st June and was incurred on the 28th April. On Post 7 you said you had received a PCN dated the 7th July , received on the 1st June and incurred on the 28th April. I assume the 7th July was a mistake and there is just 1 PCN. On Post 47 you received from DCBL in response to your snotty letter a note from them saying that the PCN was dated the 23rd April. So my question is do you have two PCN dated 23 April and the 28th April or is one of those related you parents PCN. DCBL seemed sure that the PCN they were responding to was t he one on the 23rd. Also could you please check and confirm that the good news about the discontinuance on AUG 23RD 2023 was for a PCN dated the 23rd or the 28th?  Could you please also confirm who is the keeper of your car and you are advising your parents how to handle Parking Eye by copying from how you handle your own PCN? If that is the case is it possible to post up their PCN as it is possible that their times, dates and wording may differ from yours which might make a difference. I noted for instance that you said in an early post that your parents didn't even park in a bay. Possibly the time in the car park was shorter too.  In any case, both of you were parked in a car park that only permit holders were supposed to park. This makes the signs prohibitive so cannot offer either of you a contract. So you cannot breach a contract that hasn't been offered despite what they seem to think. Or more importantly what they want you to think, so that makes you feel like you should pay them what they are asking. When you don't actually owe them anything at all.  
    • The UK Parliament petitions website closed today. It will reopen sometime after the general election when a new Petitions Committee is appointed. This means all open petitions have unfortunately had to close early.   The petitions  Immediately Reintroduce the Parking Code of Practice was only open a few wks but managed to collect 374 signatures  (His Change.Org petition has 1455 signings) Require communications from Private Parking companies to be traceable/trackable collected 300 signatures in the 5mths it was open. Thank you to anyone on the CAG forum who signed.   It seems the Parking Code of Practice has only temporarily been shelved until a new LUHC ministerial team is appointed. Let's hope the new ministers can consult and implement this code quicker than the previous ministers.
    • Don't think we can assume Labour will win the election with a majority. There are 5 weeks to go before polling day and anything can happen.  Labour are on average 21 points ahead in opinion polls, but these range from 12 point lead to a 27 point lead.  If the 12 point lead is most accurate and Labour lose support before polling day, we could be heading for a hung parliament. The opinion polls have proven to be inaccurate before.  The most important message must be for everyone to go out to vote. Last election only about 67% voted and for a third of eligible voters to not bother, suggests that they don't think their vote counts or they think it does not make any difference who gets into Government.  Website below notes election turnout percentages. Voter turnout in the UK 1918-2019 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM In the UK's general election of 2019, voter turnout was 67.3 percent, a 1.5 percent drop compared with the previous general election in 2017.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

[Urgent] Eraly termination of my flat is it possible?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I hope I can get some answers from here

( I live in Scotland I heard that the laws are different from England)

Here is my status.

I have been living in this flat for 17 month

-First lease contract was from 20th May 2010 and ended on 20th April 2011 (12 month)

-Second and current contract started from 20th May 2011 and it's end date is 20th Aug 2012 (15 month)

 

Recently I am having a bit of trouble with my finance and it seems I won't be able to pay the rent. So I am sending my family back to my home country and for myself I will be moving to a freinds house for the remainder of my PhD course(9month left).

 

However, I have asked my agency about the early termination of my current lease. The only answer I got from them is that I NEED to find a replacing tenant if I were tobe released from my contract. I am willing to surrender my deposit(which is 1200 pounds).

 

Is ther any other way to terminate the lease than replacing a new tenant to my contract?

I have heard that in Assured shortterm tenanicy after living in the flat for 6 month the tenants just needs to notify(one or two month prior) the landlord of early termination. However because this is just the words from mouth to mouth I am not certin about this. Is there any written atatement that backs up this?

 

If there is could you tell me where I can see this statement (or law)

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about Scotland, but in England/Wales if there is no break clause written into the Lease, you are liable for full fixed term rent, unless you negotiate an early surrender of T with LL either by

1. finding accptable replacement T, your liability ceases when new T moves in, or

2. pay agreed compensation to LL for early release and sign a Deed of Surreneder. Liability ceases on the date specified in the Deed.

 

You need to negotiate dirctly with LL, rather than Agency. What is your monthly rent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you for the post

Currently my rent is 625 p/m.

I have asked the agency for contact number of LL but they said they(agency) are responsible for everything and I am not allowed to speak to the LL

Is this legal?

 

Anyway thank you for your concerns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is legal if that is the instruction the landlord has given to the agency. There should be something in writing in the contract that states that the agency address is the address to use for service (unless that is an England and Wales thing?).

 

It may be an idea to get in writing what exactly the agency needs you to do to get out of the contract. If you are able to find a replacement tenant who can move in quite quickly then your loss should be much less than your 1200 deposit, but the agency may wish to create lots of additional fees to pay.

 

Reasonably they should be able to charge for references, a nominal fee for a contract and costs for checking in the new tenant (inventory and so forth).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply

I have emailed my agency several times for consideration of Termination.

However, the reply I recive is always the same.

"No termination can be arranged if no replacement is found, period"

I am now running out of hope. I guess I have to find a replacement.

But another problem has risen...

There has been 3 flat views, after seeing the flat everyone was quite interested.

However, when I tell them that the agency for this flat is XXX than they all tell me how bad that agency is ...

and they just end the conversation.

I am feeling I might not get anyone for this flat.. I was so stupid to take this place in the first place.

 

Thank you for replying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contrary to Steve_m's advice, section 1 of the 1985 Landlord and tenant act says that the agency MUST provide the landlords details within 21 days if they are requested IN WRITING. It is a criminal offence not to comply.

(1)If the tenant of premises occupied as a dwelling makes a written request for the landlord’s name and address to—

(a)any person who demands, or the last person who received, rent payable under the tenancy, or

(b)any other person for the time being acting as agent for the landlord, in relation to the tenancy,

that person shall supply the tenant with a written statement of the landlord’s name and address within the period of 21 days beginning with the day on which he receives the request.

(2)A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with subsection (1) commits a summary offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.

Level 4 is a £2,500 fine at present.
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the premises are in Scotland or Northern Ireland the law is different.

 

• In Scotland, contact -

 

Citizens Advice Bureau, Scotland:

http://www.cas.org.uk

 

Shelter Scotland, in Edinburgh:

http://shelter.org.uk

Tel. 0344-515-2444

 

Money Advice Scotland, if rent arrears:

http://www.moneyadvicescotland.org.uk

Tel. 0141-572-0237

 

See also this Sticky thread:

Great links; housing and associated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contrary to Steve_m's advice, section 1 of the 1985 Landlord and tenant act says that the agency MUST provide the landlords details within 21 days if they are requested IN WRITING. It is a criminal offence not to comply.Level 4 is a £2,500 fine at present.

 

But the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 does NOT apply outside England and Wales !

 

See: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/70/section/40

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...