Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit pretending to be RBS - chasing old NatWest debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've recently stopped paying a debt collector due to the fact that they cannot prove the debt is mine, and i am certain it was statute barred anyway, even though they claim it wasnt.

They admitted the debt was unenforceable, but i've already paid them over £600 over the past 3 years.

 

Is it worth me asking for a refund or would i be wasting my time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhhhh i thought as much cerebus. Guess i'll just write this off and forget it, as i'm thinking if i DO chase it and dont get anywhere is could come back and bite me on the ass at some point. Thought it was worth asking anyway.

Thanks for your reply :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi everyone.

About 4 years ago I was conacted by Connought Collections for an alleged debt.

Their letter threatened me with bankruptcy and bailiffs etc.

 

At that time i knew no better so i paid them £20 per month as I was about to finish my uni course and enter a professional job

so was scared that being made bankrupt could cost me my career.

 

I didnt remember the debt, but I did get divorced and had been left with a lot of debt, which i thought had been repaid by myself on settlement of the divorce.

 

I The DD just came out the bank and i never really though much of it.

 

Roll forward 3 years or so, and i now know much better through forums such as this.

 

I asked CC for a copy of the CCA because it suddenly dawned on me that i was paying a debt just because someone said it was mine and I hadnt actually any proof that it was.

 

CC could not provide any proof whatsoever that this debt was mine, so i stopped paying.

 

Several letter went back and forth and CC finally admitted they had no proof.

 

I also had a feeling that this debt is that old it would have been statute barred because its in a name i have not used for over 14 years, hence why i dont really recall the debt!

 

In actual fact, the gentleman i spoke to at CC to tell him i wouldnt be paying was very nice!

Even sent me a letter saying they couldnt pursue and that would be that.

 

2 weeks ago I got a letter from what i thought was th Royal Bank of Scotland saying i owed them £900 and could i call as a matter of urgency.

So I did as i do not and never have owed RBS money.

 

It was in fact 1st Credit! The letter was on photocopied RBS letter headed paper!

 

I explained that as far as i was concerned there was no proof the debt was mine and i wouldnt be paying,

and why where they pretending to be RBS! He said RBS is part of Nat West who I allegedly owe the money to - but they sent it on RBS paper!

 

I explained I wouldnt be paying because there is no proof the debt is mine and until it can be proved.

He said if i didnt pay my credit score would be affected etc etc etc.

Again I asked for proof it was mine. I also asked how they could affect my credit score if the debt may not be mine.

He pretty much put the phone down on me!

 

Yesterday I got a letter from 1st credit saying they appreciate i have requested a copy of the CCA and i have not disputed the fact

i benefitted from the agreement and borrowed money from the bank!

 

This is a big fat lie! I have never said to them I had borrowed any money!.

They go on to say that as such it seems clear there is no dispute over the fact that funds borrowed are required to be repaind

and even if the agreement was not enforceable, it is clear from case law, this only prevents one party from enforcing the agreement throught he couts,

it does not prevent collections activity or placing of information on the credit file.

They then ask me to respond to discuss repayment.

 

What should I do? Can they send me letters pretending to be RBS, and can they pursue this debt even though they do not, by their own admission, have a shred of proof it is mine?

 

many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

typical spoofing tactics by CC & 1st crapit.

 

check your CRA file

 

if the debt does not show - end of!

 

and stay off the phone to DCA's etc

NEVER EVER talk about your debt on the phone to ANYONE.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both of you. I dont usually call DC but they sent me a letter I thought was from RBS, its on official paper and everythign and was signed by someone apparently at RBS Collections.

 

Also - the title of my thread has been changed, but this isnt an old RBS debt.....the letter was sent by 1st Credit PRETENDING to be RBS so i would call. The debt is apparently an is Nat West one.

 

Also do i need to write to them and tell them to back off? I've not checked my credit file as i found it very difficult to cancel the £14.99 monthly fee last time and dont want the hassle. It hadnt showed up 3 months ago so I assume it was never there int he first place? Can 1st Credit put anythign on my file if it wasnt there int he first place?

Edited by Yam950
Link to post
Share on other sites

check your CRA file before you do anythig

sorry about the thread name

that was me merging stuff

i'll sort it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both of you. I dont usually call DC but they sent me a letter I thought was from RBS, its on official paper and everythign and was signed by someone apparently at RBS Collections.

 

Also - the title of my thread has been changed, but this isnt an old RBS debt.....the letter was sent by 1st Credit PRETENDING to be RBS so i would call. The debt is apparently an is Nat West one.

 

Also do i need to write to them and tell them to back off? I've not checked my credit file as i found it very difficult to cancel the £14.99 monthly fee last time and dont want the hassle. It hadnt showed up 3 months ago so I assume it was never there int he first place? Can 1st Credit put anythign on my file if it wasnt there int he first place?

 

Have you contacted RBS to see if the person named on the letter actually exists?

 

Have you sent 1stcredit a cca request? if not do so - if the paperwork never existed before it is unlikley to exist now.

 

Then - and this is the important bit - complain to both your local trading standards and the OFT.

 

If they are pretending to be someone else - i.e. mislead you to the validity of a claim - in order to make a financial gain - i.e. make you pay money to them which they may not be entitled to - then they are committing an act of Fraud.

 

At the least thy are deliberatley misleading you by pretending to be RBS and that is aginst he OFT debt collection guidlines.

 

Here is the link to the CCA request - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted RBS to see if the person named on the letter actually exists?

 

Have you sent 1stcredit a cca request? if not do so - if the paperwork never existed before it is unlikley to exist now.

 

Then - and this is the important bit - complain to both your local trading standards and the OFT.

 

If they are pretending to be someone else - i.e. mislead you to the validity of a claim - in order to make a financial gain - i.e. make you pay money to them which they may not be entitled to - then they are committing an act of Fraud.

 

At the least thy are deliberatley misleading you by pretending to be RBS and that is aginst he OFT debt collection guidlines.

 

Here is the link to the CCA request - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter.

 

I didnt contact RBS no. Isent a CCA request to Connought and they could not produce one. 1st Credit have admitted in the letter that there isnt one.

 

I've just checked my credit file, there is nothing on there, I have no defaults or CCJs and my credit score is 999!!

 

What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can either issue a new CCA request to 1st credit - but as you have already made a CCA request on this alleged account you can send them the following letter.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

 

I would also contact RBS and complain to them about sending you the "letter" you had from 1st credit and enclose a copy of the above template also. Be intersting to see how they reply. If they deny knowing anything about it then 1st credit will have committed a criminal offence.

 

Report the matter to Trading Standards and the OFT in any case as 1st Credit have tried to mislead you - and thats against OFT guidlines.

 

So

1. Send letter from Template to 1st Credit

2. Send letter from Template to RBS (addressed to person named on it, see what their response is)

3. Complain about 1st credit misleading you to local trading standards, (via consumer diret website) and also complain to the OFT via the OFT website.

 

It is important to make the complaints as well as get these fools off your back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can either issue a new CCA request to 1st credit - but as you have already made a CCA request on this alleged account you can send them the following letter.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

 

I would also contact RBS and complain to them about sending you the "letter" you had from 1st credit and enclose a copy of the above template also. Be intersting to see how they reply. I fhtye den knowing anything about it then 1st credit will have committed a criminal offence.

 

Report the matter to Trading Standards and the OFT in any case as 1st Credit have tried to mislead you - and thats against OFT guidlines.

 

So

1. Send letter from Template to 1st Credit

2. Send letter from Template to RBS (addressed to person named on it, see what their response is)

3. Complain about 1st credit misleading you to local trading standards, (via consumer diret website) and also complain to the OFT via the OFT website.

 

It is important to make the complaints as well as get these fools off your back.

 

 

Thats brilliant. Thank you all very much :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd be threatening rbs with you seeking compensationtoo

its on their letterhead after all.

 

so no debt

what a suprise!

 

yet another person spoofed into paying a debt by a DCA when there never was a debt to pay.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd be threatening rbs with you seeking compensationtoo

its on their letterhead after all.

 

so no debt

what a suprise!

 

yet another person spoofed into paying a debt by a DCA when there never was a debt to pay.

 

dx

 

Good idea! When i spoke to 1st Credit on the phone and queried why it was on RBS paper the bloke said it was because Nat West are part of RBS! Errr.....ok, but its nothing to do with an RBS account! I have bank accounts with RBS hencew why i rang in the first place, i thought there was a problem somewhere. Grrrrr

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest may have assigned an alleged debt to RBS but they are 2 separate legal entities...... even the courts get this wrong from time to time - see if RBS respond with enough info for 1st Crud to hang themselves with

 

Gez

 

 

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC

 

135 BISHOPSGATE

LONDON

EC2M 3UR

 

 

I.C.O Registration Number: Z4936258

 

Company registration No. 00929027

 

FSA Reference Number: FRN 121878

 

 

 

 

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC

 

36 ST ANDREW SQUARE

EDINBURGH

MIDLOTHIAN

EH2 2YB

 

 

I.C.O RegistrationNumber: Z5619639

 

Company registration No. SC090312

 

FSA Reference Number: FRN 121882

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, i've dug out the letters and just want to clarify some things.

The first letter is dated 19/09/2011. This has the RBS logo on it and an address which says:

Royal Bank of Scotland, Credit Card Operations, PO Box 6050,

Southend on Sea, SS99 1Wl.

The phone number is 01702 446 904. This phone number is dead.

 

The letter then says "we hereby give notice of the assignment of the debt due to us by you in respect of your

Royal Bank of Scotland credit card account (I never had any form of RBS credit card - ever).

 

On XX/07/2004 you account was assigned to 1st Credit (Finance) Limited who are now legal owners of this debt. (Its statute barred now anyway)

It then goes on to say i must address all comms to them, gives their address and a phone number (which is the one i called)

 

It is then signed:

Yours faithfully,

followed by an illegible signature

and underneath says Collections Manager, Royal Bank of Scotland.

 

The second letter is dated 23/09/2011 and says:

RE: Your agreement with NATWEST, relating to account number 1234567890 and the balance outstanding.

 

It says the letter is sent by way of introduction to 1st Credit Limited and my account (one i dont have!),

goverened by the above credit card agreement went into default an was susequently charged-off by RBS.

 

It then says the balance is owned by 1st Crud following an assignemtn from RBS on XX/07/2004

 

It then goes on about how i should pay, if im paying RBS i should stop and pay 1st Crud instead etc etc etc.

 

The third letter is the one i described in my first post and is a complete lie about me benefitting from the funds!

 

My dates are a bit out in my first post - sorry about that i couldnt lay my hands on the letters earlier and have spent most of the day looking for them!

 

So - what is going on? I have RBS bank accounts, but i have never owed them any money at all, and i do not have an RBS credit card.

 

Are 1st Crud trying it on and using tactics that are illegal or are they in the right?

I just dont undersand where RBS fits into all this because the way it reads is as if they passed the debt to RBS

and the first letter is headed with the RBS logo but the telephone and fax numbers are both dead.

 

Thanks folks and sorry I wasnt clearer in my first post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, they have alleged the following:

 

1. You had an agreement with RBS

2. The agreement was for provision of an RBS credit card

3. RBS assigned the account to 1st crud during July 2004

 

This would make sense..... if you ever held an account with RBS and if the notice had been sent by RBS

 

or

 

1. You had an agreement with Natwest

2. The agreement was for provision of an RBS credit card

4. RBS charged off the account during July 2004 and assigned to 1st crud

 

I think I'd be asking RBS a couple of questions :-)

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gez - i have had bank accounts with RBS for the past 15 years with no problems whatsoever. Ive never had a credit card with them and i am sure if there WAS a problems and i did owe them money they would have been on to me themselves a long time ago?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...