Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is bankruptcy the right option for me as director of LTD company?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is what you need to read, it explains how doing what toddle is suggesting is unlawful and what the conseuences can be, It is mainly aimed at people that have been given a disqualification order but applies equally to persons disqualified for the reason of bankruptcy.

 

http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/Companies/insolvent-companies/i-am-a-director#2

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok, forgive my lack of knowledge in this area hence seeking advice on here, please bear with me, as its paramount that i understand possible consequences of my action based on decisions i make and the very last thing i want to do is do anything illegal! so let say i have either scenario, what are the consequences for each:

 

a) a creditor has made me aware that they

intend to apply to make me BR, so i re-appoint a new director....

 

b) i feel i need to make myself BR and appoint new director prior to making an application.....

 

c) i am not informed by a creditor they plan to make me BR nor do i have intentions at this point to do it myself and enter into alternative negotiations to deal with the debt but during this time, i appoint new director due to ill health etc.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

both thr first two are the same, what matters is what you do during the bankruptcy as that is when you are disqualified, the restriction is specifically designed so that you cant have the protection of limited company status whilst you are bankrupt, you seem to be trying to circumvent this.

 

did you read the link i posted

 

this is the main point from it

 

What am I not allowed to do?

While the order or undertaking is in force, it stops you acting as if you were a director. So you cannot avoid the order or undertaking by simply changing your job description.

 

The order or undertaking also means that you must not get other people to manage a company under your instructions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm reading this correctly, the 2 main things the OP desires are: a) access to the PDQ machine to process payments, and b) the unique name of the company.

 

If the OP doesn't mind being an employee of the company, and at 'the mercy' of any new director / shareholders, then there should be nothing stopping the OP using the company's PDQ terminal as an employee, to generate cash flow for the company, as long as it is as an employee, and not as a 'shadow director'. The new director must be that - directing the company, not a figurehead for the OP "directing in the background".

 

If the (unique?) company name is of value, and the OP isn't a 'shadow director', would this raise queries as to if the is was a 'shadow directorship' if the company was just handed back, free and gratis, once the OP's bankruptcy (if it proceeds) is discharged?. How could the OP avoid the appearance of a shadow directorship, whilst working for the company as an employee, beyond showing that they (and the company) are managed by the new director, rather than the OP doing the management?. New director showing management, OP showing employee status, and need there be an exchange of consideration when the new Director resigns after (re)appointing the OP?.

 

I'm not advocating a shadow directorship, nor how to conceal one ; I'm advocating the very opposite, if there is a way the OP can get employment and comply with the law, and show his/her intent to comply with the law.

 

Given the company sounds as if it is in perilous finances (no assets), if the OP went ahead as described and the company failed, and it was then alleged that the OP was in fact a shadow director, would they become liable PERSONALLY for any company debts? and, if so, would any such debts not be cleared off as part of the original bankruptcy (possibly then prevent the bankruptcy being discharged at a year)?.

 

I'm not an expert, so this may be a false fear, but it is clear the OP is looking at options, doesn't want to commit unlawful acts, and wants to understand the implications of the options before choosing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see both bazzaS and debt info point of view, but is it not about my "intentions" at every stage of the process? I am not wanting to decieve nor avoid "assets" as the company has none but i merely am facing to complication of closing the LTD Co down pre-BR (which is simple as it has not debts!) but the hurdle i have is setting up as sole trader the following week and declaring i am in BR and not being able to get a card merchant account.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

both thr first two are the same, what matters is what you do during the bankruptcy as that is when you are disqualified, the restriction is specifically designed so that you cant have the protection of limited company status whilst you are bankrupt, you seem to be trying to circumvent this.

 

did you read the link i posted

 

this is the main point from it

 

What am I not allowed to do?

While the order or undertaking is in force, it stops you acting as if you were a director. So you cannot avoid the order or undertaking by simply changing your job description.

 

The order or undertaking also means that you must not get other people to manage a company under your instructions.

 

I did, but would suggestion "C" not be perfectly legal and the most responsible action due to the circumstance? (if only i had a crystal ball to end this dilemma).....:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm reading this correctly, the 2 main things the OP desires are: a) access to the PDQ machine to process payments, and b) the unique name of the company.

 

If the OP doesn't mind being an employee of the company, and at 'the mercy' of any new director / shareholders, then there should be nothing stopping the OP using the company's PDQ terminal as an employee, to generate cash flow for the company, as long as it is as an employee, and not as a 'shadow director'. The new director must be that - directing the company, not a figurehead for the OP "directing in the background".

 

If the (unique?) company name is of value, and the OP isn't a 'shadow director', would this raise queries as to if the is was a 'shadow directorship' if the company was just handed back, free and gratis, once the OP's bankruptcy (if it proceeds) is discharged?. How could the OP avoid the appearance of a shadow directorship, whilst working for the company as an employee, beyond showing that they (and the company) are managed by the new director, rather than the OP doing the management?. New director showing management, OP showing employee status, and need there be an exchange of consideration when the new Director resigns after (re)appointing the OP?.

 

I'm not advocating a shadow directorship, nor how to conceal one ; I'm advocating the very opposite, if there is a way the OP can get employment and comply with the law, and show his/her intent to comply with the law.

 

Given the company sounds as if it is in perilous finances (no assets), if the OP went ahead as described and the company failed, and it was then alleged that the OP was in fact a shadow director, would they become liable PERSONALLY for any company debts? and, if so, would any such debts not be cleared off as part of the original bankruptcy (possibly then prevent the bankruptcy being discharged at a year)?.

 

I'm not an expert, so this may be a false fear, but it is clear the OP is looking at options, doesn't want to commit unlawful acts, and wants to understand the implications of the options before choosing.

 

yes, thats right....... if i was appointed as a "sales representative" for the Co, i would need to process card payments on a self-employed basis in order to recieve my commission......

Link to post
Share on other sites

but simply giving it over on the expectation that they will give it back after a year is exerting control over the company,

 

ypu deciding what job role you are going to be assigned during the bankruptcy is exerting cotrol over the company,

 

would you be happy if the new director decided that you should just scrub the toilets, as he feels that is your best role

 

what would you do if the new director just decided not to employ you and take the name and business contacts for himself

 

if you have any control to stop that happening then you are exerting control over the company

Link to post
Share on other sites

but simply giving it over on the expectation that they will give it back after a year is exerting control over the company,

 

ypu deciding what job role you are going to be assigned during the bankruptcy is exerting cotrol over the company,

 

would you be happy if the new director decided that you should just scrub the toilets, as he feels that is your best role

 

what would you do if the new director just decided not to employ you and take the name and business contacts for himself

 

if you have any control to stop that happening then you are exerting control over the company

 

i trust that would not happen with who i finally decide, family or close friend and i would have a contract for my designated job, im confident with that side of things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought.....if I were to close the Ltd Co when a creditor was about to apply to make me BR or I apply, is that unlawful? And if during BR would i have to inform IR if i become sole trader? if yes, would the OR take any of my earnings for creditors during and after discharge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Answers in red below

 

Just a thought.....if I were to close the Ltd Co when a creditor was about to apply to make me BR or I apply, is that unlawful? No as you are unable to be a Director when BR.

And if during BR would i have to inform IR if i become sole trader? Yes if yes, would the OR take any of my earnings for creditors during and after discharge? Would depend upon your surplus income in regards to Income and Expenditure

Link to post
Share on other sites

can the OR have a financial interest in the LTD Co if there is a new director pre-BR?

 

I gut tells me to go with the sole trader route as i do not want to do anything wrong but sole trader is just as compliacted as to declaring to creditors that i would be BR and then getting refused a card merchant account! Grr........very frustrating :(

 

am i completely discharged from ALL creditors after BR? Or would my income still be OR interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OR assesses your income and expenditure, if you have a surplus you may have to pay that in for up to 3 years

 

I see....Im contemplating is BR is worth it then! If i'm forced by a creditor then i wil have no choice but to upset the apple cart with change within the company....either way i am going to end up with bad credit. do i have better chance with creditors/mortgage application few years after BR? Because at the mo i sure dont stand a chance in hell (nor if i dont got BR!) :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

can the OR have a financial interestlink3.gif in the LTD Co if there is a new director pre-BR?

It's nothing to do with the Director it is who is the shareholder as it is the shareholders who own the company. If you have shares in the company at daye of BR the OR will have the benefit of these.

.either way i am going to end up with bad credit. do i have better chance with creditors/mortgage application few years after BR? Because at the mo i sure dont stand a chance in hell (nor if i dont got BR!) :sad:

 

if you have defaults on your credit file at the moment you are going to struggle to get a mortgage or credit card. Defaults stay on your credit file for 6 years from the date of first being registered. If you go BR you would probably be able to look at getting a mortgage about 3 years after discharge but expect to pay higher rates and have fewer options available to you. I know people who have got credit cards after 3 months of being discharged (why?!) with people like Vanquis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont take them as such in the way you are thinking, by law they automatically transfer over to the trustee with no effort involved

 

oh ok! I am swaying towards the sole trader route to be honest because the other way could be percieved as illegal or wrong and i do not know who i can appoint anyway, i am making a few enquiries to card merchant companies (including existing one) to see if they offer accounts to sole traders in BR...await there reply.

 

I have a few questions though:

 

1. To be a sole trader, would i do it the day after i file for BR? If so, do i have to inform OR?

2.would i have a basic current account to be a sold trader? (not a business one right!), can you run card merchant transactions through non-business accounts?

3. what banks would give me an account being in BR?

4.will the OR close down my personal bank account i have already prior to BR? If so, could i clear it of small money then close it prior myself?

5. do i go to my local court with the BR papers and its done on the day? and is that classed as the official BR day? then i can be sole trader next day?

 

and thanks again to both debtinfo and toddle2 for all your effort and taking your time ito clarify everything with me....:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. To be a sole trader, would i do it the day after i file for BR? If so, do i have to inform OR? Yes and yes. You need to inform the OR of a change in circumstances

2.would i have a basic current account to be a sold trader? (not a business one right!), can you run card merchant transactions through non-business accounts? You are not supposed to run a business through a personal bank account but lots of people do. You would struggle to get a business bank account whilst BR and if this is the desiginated bank account the merchant account transfers the money to they will just transfer the funds as instructed.

3. what banks would give me an account being in BR? You can try Natwest, Co-Op and Barclays

4.will the OR close down my personal bank account i have already prior to BR? If so, could i clear it of small money then close it prior myself? If it's just a basic bank account with no credit facility they will just normally temporarily freeze it and then let you keep it. However, even though the OR may say you can keep it the bank themselves may close it once they are informed you are BR. Best bet is to set up a parachute account with one of the banks in point 3.

5. do i go to my local court with the BR papers and its done on the day? and is that classed as the official BR day? then i can be sole trader next day? Depends on the Court. Some you can do it on the day others you have to ring and make an appointment. Speak to your local Court. The date of the appointment will be the one that you are made BR (barring an unforeseen problems with the Petition

 

i am making a few enquiries to card merchant companies (including existing one) to see if they offer accounts to sole traders in BR...await there reply.

 

Not a hope in hell of getting one in these circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that. The only problem i am facing is card merchant services for a PDQ, so if i change to sole trader i cant get one but if i stay as ltd co with new director i can keep the ne i got,right?

 

The company can keep the one the company has.

The company's director can allow you to use it as a company employee, with sales processed on behalf of the company.

You can't keep the current one as it belongs to the company, but the company may allow you to keep / use it for the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...