Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning guys As Bank suggested, I've now re-worked my POC to include details of my parcel's original loss,  miraculous rediscovery a month later and subsequent delivery, albeit having been opened and the contents removed. Grateful for your thoughts please, as (P2G having gone very quiet) I intend to initiate court proceedings against P2G tomorrow - 1 May. Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing 8 second-hand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and whilst Evri collected the parcel for delivery on 18 March 24 they then ‘misplaced’ it a day later, formally declaring it lost on 27 March. On 16 April they found it and delivered it on 17 April but, at some point before delivery, it had been opened and the contents removed . The defendant refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is also in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80  
    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Indesit Washer/Dryer bought from Currys


squirt72
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First time here so please be kind :-)

 

I bought a new washer dryer from Currys in January. It broke down in March and was repaired by Indesit. It broke down last week and was repaired this Tuesday and it has now broken down again today!! :mad2:

 

Indesit won't replace the machine as they say they have to repair under the terms of their warranty, which is so irritating as it is very inconvenient and why should I have it repaired again when the last time it broke down within 48 hours of being repaired.

 

Should Curry's be responsible as they sold me the machine?

 

I'm lost as to what to do and getting increasingly angry with what I perceive to being fobbed off!

 

Thanks in advance for any advice :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have them bang to rights, demand a new washer dryer under the sale of goods act (SOGA) if they fail to replace the faulty item, report them to trading standards, jobs a goodun!

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/sogahome/;jsessionid=A5549D9C677C400EBACB5A822418256D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have them bang to rights, demand a new washer dryer under the sale of goods act (SOGA) if they fail to replace the faulty item, report them to trading standards, jobs a goodun!

http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/sogahome/;jsessionid=A5549D9C677C400EBACB5A822418256D

 

And of course it is the retailer you are going for

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its currys that you bought it from your contract is with them

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i've just spoken to Currys and they are saying i need to speak to the manufacturer (Indesit) to get an uplift number before they will replace the machine...gggrrrrrrr!!!! I'm getting increasingly angry. Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what curry are saying is they wont replace it unless the manufacture authroise them to.

 

Under the Sales of Goods Act (SAG) the goods have to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose .... which you would say the goods are not

 

So the item is faulty. You first have to prove to the store that you bought the item from them.

Secondly If you are returning the item within what would be considered a reasonable time for you to have inspected the goods. You are entitled to a full refund or, if you prefer, you can ask for a repair or replacement.

 

The store may try to claim that you have had the goods for 9 months and thefore have had enouugh time to inspect the goods and reject them. Therefore you have accepted the item so can no longer demand a full refund but you may be entitled to a repair of replacement.

 

So far you have had 3 or 4 repairs is it diferant fualts or the same thing?

Citi Cards - £800 - N1 Form logged at court

Defence entered

£279 refuned £521 outstanding on claim

Hearing 15th Nov 2006

Hearing 18th Jan 2007

Defence Stuck out - £549

March 07 Bailiffs called in to collect

20/4 Cheque for £549 - I WIN

 

Abbey - Setteled in full 9th Nov 2006 £3,300

 

Abbey - Data Protetion Act informtion

ICO complaint logged

 

Abbey - N1 Logged - 12/02/2007 £933

FOS Complaint logged 07/03/2007

£180 refunued -Good will Gesture 01/04/2007

Hearing 15th June 2007

 

Capital One Refunded £50

 

Egg - Data Protection Act request

Returned charges £80

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what curry are saying is they wont replace it unless the manufacture authroise them to.

 

Under the Sales of Goods Act (SAG) the goods have to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose .... which you would say the goods are not

 

So the item is faulty. You first have to prove to the store that you bought the item from them.

Secondly If you are returning the item within what would be considered a reasonable time for you to have inspected the goods. You are entitled to a full refund or, if you prefer, you can ask for a repair or replacement.

 

The store may try to claim that you have had the goods for 9 months and thefore have had enouugh time to inspect the goods and reject them. Therefore you have accepted the item so can no longer demand a full refund but you may be entitled to a repair of replacement.

 

So far you have had 3 or 4 repairs is it diferant fualts or the same thing?

 

Hi

 

Valid points of course but it matters not whether they were different faults or whether the OP has had it for 9 months or what the retailer says about contacting the manufacturer.

 

This piece of crap has been repaired a number of times and is unfit for purpose. simples.

 

Uplift number????? what a load of nuts.

 

Go in hard...formal complaint to Currys together with an lba saying that if they don't replace the machine within 7 days you will issue in court and seek damages at the courts discretion. You can hand deliver it to the store you purchased from and get them to sign for it as well.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have not read the replies so apologies if I tread on anyone's toes or go over old ground..

 

BUT!!!!

The manufacturer IS NOT LIABLE it is DEFINITELY CURRY'S!

 

Demand to speak to the manager, in fact go into the store, and then demand to speak with the manager, TELL him that you want the item replaced, it has been faulty from the very beginning, it had been repaired and has again failed, you DO NOT want a repair, you WANT a replacement, what is he going to do about it??

 

I have no idea where your local TS is but find it here...http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/extra/contact.cfm?frmAlias=/contact/ although it will be consumer direct I think you will get through too, keep the number in your phone, if the manager gives you any flannel less for "Yes we will send you a replacement this PM" then ring TS or CD in store and report the matter.

 

They MUST replace the item, there is no ifs buts or maybe, it is clearly faulty, and it has been from the outset.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...