Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard continue enforcement of un enforcable credit card debt.


Highlander5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can any one help. Barclaycard claimed I owed them a debt last year but I did not recorgnise it at all. I made a request for the original contract. Barclaycard wrote back saying they could not provide me with any details about the account other then they had aquired it from Morgan Stanly. They sent a 're constituted' terms and conditions which were very generic and onle line statement saying what the total being demanded was (£7000). They confirmed in the letter that the debt was unenforcable. They quoted some strange case laws suggesting that because of these cases they were within their rights to continue to enforce the demand even without any contract between us. They have now registered a deafult notice against me and passed the debt on to Credit Solutions for collection. I have talked to FOS who beleive that Barclaycard were wrong to do this but that FOS have no power to stop Barclaycard from enforceing the un enforcable debt. I talked to a senior manager at Barclaycard who told me that if I did not pay the full ammount within 14 days they would start court action to get a second charge on my home and add all costs onto the debt. I still do not know what this debt of £7000 is about as I have never had a Barclaycard or Morgam Stanly debt. What should I do to stop Barclaycard from harrasing me for this debt?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

May not help but several years ago I applied for and received a Morgan Stanley Card. I never even activated it! TMorgan Stanley were then transferred to Goldfish and I suddenly received a demand for a very small figure under 200 pounds but I had never even activated or used the card! I 'suggested' that someone within Morgan Stanley or Goldfish had accessed the account and used my details illegally and the debt was immediately cancelled! Since then Barclaycard have taken over Goldfish - sounds like a similar scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responce and i will look into the posts recommended. I know that there are a lot more people impacted by false claims of debt then thoes that post on forums like this. I genuinly have never had this debt and I know of other people who have ended up paying debts that they never owed. It is frightining how Banks can manipulate the law and just demand money from people.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Highlander and welcome to CAG

 

We have a "prove it" letter which you should send to them - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

 

You should mention that you have never had either a Barclaycard or a Morgan Stanley account.

 

Ask them to carefully check, as it would appear they have mistakenly chosen to pursue you for someone else's debt.

 

Also, point out that they have wrongly registered a default against you and you will take action against them seeking compensation for damage caused to your reputation, as per the case of Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society.

 

Read up on this case yourself, and see how they respond to you.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks slick132. I will send them the letter.

An update on the situation. Barclaycard DCA called me and asked me to settle the debt for £3800. I told them I knew nothing of the debt and to send me anything to demonstrate that the account they claim to be in debt even exsists as Barclaycard have put in writeing to me that they can not produce any data for the account, not even a list of transactions, a contract or any other information about the account. I was told by the DCA agent that if I did not settle on the day they would apply for a second charge on my house.

 

The agent also told me that the claim was based on an entry in my credit file. I checked my credit file and there is a default entered but it relates to an account that was in default in 2007 for the ammount they are claiming. The entry was by Morgan Stanly but I still do not recorgnise it as I have never had such an account and i would never have run it up to £7000.( I have not checked my credit file before now) Their is also no mention of Morgan Stanly before or after the one entry in my credit file. I now allso have a second default registered for the same ammount and account by Barclaycard.

 

Somthing is definatly not right about this. I am starting to get a little concerned at the power Barclaycard seem to have. This is starting to feel allmost like legalised Black Mail. Pay us the money you don't owe us or we will get a second charge on your house.

 

I am allso concerned that a lot of District Judges appear to be giving away second charge on homes like it was a windfall benifit for large financial organisations.

 

Surely there must be somthing the public can do to highlight what is going on and bring it under control.

 

I am starting to think that the only way out of this for me is to pay up or get expensive solicitors that i can not afford. Even if i had expensive solicitors there is no gurantee that I can stop Barclaycard.

 

So much for your flexible freind :mad2:

 

I am going to try and resolve this using the advice and letters on this site first. I will post how i get on.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is not your debt they cannot enforce it. They cannot enforce anything without proof. If you have never had a Morgan Stanley account they cannot prove you have.

 

As far as the threat by the Barclaycard agent telling you that they can apply for a second charge on your home is concerned, they cannot do this without getting a Judgment against you. If they could, all these lousy banks and DCAs would be at it. He has deliberately lied and misled you and you should call OFT and the Financial Ombudsman first thing tomorrow and report him. I've reported Barclays/barclaycard to the FOS loads of times over all manner of things and they've always backed down.

 

The agent's name didn't begin with 'D', did it? I once had a Mr D from barclaycard telling me that if I didn't make a payment immediately, at 9.00 p.m., he would have a debt collector banging on my door at 9.00 a.m. the following morning. I was crying and hysterical, and giving him the payment would have meant I had only £3 left for the following fortnight, and he kept on and on shouting and trying to bully me. B****rd.

 

Without proof of the debt they won't be doing anything if you let them know that you are perfectly well aware of your rights and legal position.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Highlander,

 

Avoid talking to any DCA on the phone. Tell them to put anything in writing so you can include it in the case you are building against them.

 

Ignore their threats about second charges, etc. They cannot take court action based on just an (incorrect) entry on your CRA files.

 

If they do take court action, this will be your opportunity to defend, clear your name, get the incorrect CRA data removed and seek compensation for damage caused to your reputation.

 

I assume you now have copies of your CRA file showing the 2 defaults. Use this to contest the entry with Experian or whichever CRA's show the entries.

 

You should not need to use a solicitor although that is, of course, your prerogative. We should be able to provide you with adequate support here.

 

I assume this is either a case of mistaken identity (where they chase you because of a similar name) or one of fraud (where someone has opened an account using your name and address and run up a debt).

 

I think it's more likely that it's mistaken identity, so look carefully for any differences of name spelling, initials, address, etc.

 

Have you read up on the Kpohraror case I referred to above.

 

:-)

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. I think it is worth pursueing a clim in line with Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society. Since the original default was around 2007 my understanding is defaults last 6 years of which four had passed. The new default would remain on my credit file and impact my credit rating for an additional 2 years past the original date. My understanding is that Regardeless of who now owns the debt (and it's not me), Barclaycard should have known that a deafulat was allready registered on the account when they acquired it (from Morgan Stanly or Gold Fish). If they claim they were unaware they will be in breach of financial regulations which state that accurate records need to be kept of all accounts for six years and that full details need to be passed on with any debt from one company to the other.

 

I now have a claim form from FOS asking for details of my complaint. Can any one give advice on the best way to complete this to make sure FOS are fully aware of how Barclaycard and their debt collection agent CCS are conducting themselves in this case?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re completing the FOS complaint forms, just complete them accurately, honestly and briefly.

 

Make it quite clear that you have never had any such account.

 

Be aware that the FOS will take months to complete any such investigation and the outcome may not give you any real justice. But you can use this time to research what remedies you can pursue yourself, to get proper justice and compensation.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...