Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4658 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone give us some urgent advice please, we have an outstanding debt for business rates, we had an agreement with the bailiffs but very stupidly completely forgot to pay. We have seen the bailiff again but the long and the short of it is that he rang up yesterday afternoon to say that we had 2 days to pay in full. I said I would ring him back in the morning, which I have just done. I explained we could only pay half today and the rest next week. He won't accept this and says we only have until 5pm today, I queried this as he had said 2 days and his reply was yes yesterday and today!! I suggested that on that basis we would be better to close the workshop until we had all of the money next week to prevent them taking things, his reply to this was that they would just employ a lock smiths at our expense to break in, well that would mean undoing 8 padlocks and moving a vehicle!!

 

So what I urgently need to know is can they refuse to accept half of the money now and also can they break in at our expense, especially when it would be so involved? Any help greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they would need a locksmith...as they are simply being bloody minded pay the Council direct online and then email & write to them (letter by signed for, read receipts for email) telling them why you have been placed to take such action. You can tell them you are aggrieved by the bailiff and will only make future payments direct to them regardless of whether they recall recovery from the bailiff. Start telling them what is going to happen, not have the bailiff telling you supposedly on their behalf.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are talking plenty of time thanks to the age of technology. Payment now online,,,email 2 mins later. Copy in bailiffs...light blue touch paper and retire.

 

They have been notified the OP is not evading the debt and the payment they refused has been made directly to the person it is owed to!!!!!!!!!

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ross & Robbers that says it all............................ you may have missed a payment but that does not mean you are avoiding the debt and you can show that by making a partial payment today. What I have suggested has been Tried and Tested with success.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I agree - it should be instantaneous but this is the council we are talking about. They have to pass it on to twenty five different departments before it even gets looked at. I know the op has agreed to pay but they have failed to keep to an agreed payment schedule, this non compliance (whether genuine oversight or not) could be deemed as time wasting.

 

The bailiff by threatening to use his powers to enter may be a bluff to worry the op into paying. if they are county court bailiffs imo it is unlikely they'd enter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes unfortunately the premises are solely commercial. so does this mean they are able to get a locksmith and break in?

 

Have they gained peaceful entry previously and if so have they made a levy or seized any goods? They cannot just turn up and force entry, these are for other debts.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

because we are a business people can just come into the premises unfortunately. I know you can argue that if we had just paid the bill in the first place we wouldn't be in this situation but what makes it seem even worse was we were getting small business relief, during the year these rates are for we became a ltd company, i went in and told the council this so that they could update their records. They now say that we should have reapplied as a limited company for small business relief and because we didn't we have to pay full rate, otherwise there wouldn't even be a debt. Why they couldn't have told us this at the time so we could have applied straight away and saved all this money and trouble is beyond me so yes we owe the debt but I do feel very scammed over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I agree - it should be instantaneous but this is the council we are talking about. They have to pass it on to twenty five different departments before it even gets looked at. I know the op has agreed to pay but they have failed to keep to an agreed payment schedule, this non compliance (whether genuine oversight or not) could be deemed as time wasting.

 

The bailiff by threatening to use his powers to enter may be a bluff to worry the op into paying. if they are county court bailiffs imo it is unlikely they'd enter.

 

As a timed and dated receipt for the payment can be printed, they cannot claim non payment, of whatever sum has been paid no matter what they do internally with it.and the receipt is evidence to wave under the bailiffs nose

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...