Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Extremely annoyed!!!!!


mrsfedup
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a credit card with C®apital one bank. I was paying £57 per month until I became unemployed in June 2011. As soon as I was aware that my circumstances were changing I wrote to them to let them know. To make a long story short I have written several letters and none of the responses have acknowledged my circumstances - even when I sent proof of JSA, detailed income and expenditure etc !:-x

 

I recently wrote to them(debitas) to make a complaint as I'm sick and tired of repeating myself, their response(from capital one:?:) was " we issued our final response to your complaint last year, and therefore will not be changing our stance".:-x:-x. How does my complaint from last year have any bearing what so ever on my current circumstances? Furthermore I refuse to discuss my account my phone, I write instead. The latest letter states " until you phone debitas to agree a repayment plan, the calls will continue".:x:-x Surely they are not entitled to have this attitude and something can be done?

 

Please can someone advice me? as I feel mentally drained with these idiots

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Telephone harassment template is here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter

 

Pay them only what you can easily afford, even if that is only £1 per month.

 

These days it is you who tells them what they are going to get not the other way round. Don't be bullied by them.

 

Have you claimed back any unlawful charges on the account or ppi if relevant?

 

regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that. I don't have PPI on the account. I've told them I will pay £20 per month and since I wrote to them in June They're being as awkward as possible. I sent the telephone template previously to which they replied :-

 

"In your letter you mention that you have asked for the calls to stop but they have continued. Please note that telephone contact is the most appropriate way of communication and until you contact debitas to arrange a payment agreement you will receive telephone contact. You've also advised us that you will record any further calls made to you by either capital one or debitas. Please be aware if you have not gained authority from the advisor. you will not be able to use these calls for any action you may wish to take and you will have no right to use the call for any purpose other than personal use".

 

Can they legally do this? and if not how can I stop them?

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can report them to Trading Standards, OFT and Offcom for misues of the communications system.

 

It is not for them to tell you how the recordings are used. There is a sticky somewhere which goes into detail about using recorded calls in court as well.

 

I'd report them and then write to them and tell them that you have now made formal complaints to these bodies.

 

From then on, carry on making your token payments by standing order and ignore their pitiful whinings.

 

What about the question of reclaiming any charges on the account?

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I feel a lot more positive after reading your post. Do you have any links for the contact details of the bodies you mention and i take it I would need copies of correspondence between myself and them to back up these complaint(s). To date I've being paying them by cheque. I did mention concerns about the account costs and refunding them in my previous letters, but unfortunately they fall on 'deaf ears' and they dodge the main issues outlined in my complaint.

Thanks again

Mrs fedup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

A quick google will get you to the relevant bodies.

 

And yes, submit copies of correspondence with your complaints.

 

As for charges, you would need to put in a formal claim to the original creditor to get these back. You are looking on your statements for anything described as "late payment fee" or " over limit fee". You can also claim interest on those chrages too.

 

Have a look in the Capital One forum to get some idea on how to go about dealing with Cap1 charges claims.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thank you. As regards claiming back fee's is there a time frame you know of please? Also since my debt has been passed to Debitas, no longer have online access to my account and they're trying to force me into speaking to them over the phone to resolve this, and refuse to send me statements by post!

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No time frame as such.

 

If you don't have all of your statements I would send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to Cap1. It will cost £10 statutory fee and will yield, amongst other things, copy statements/transaction history. From these it will be possible to identify all of the unlawful charges. They will have 40 days to comply.

 

There is a template for SAR in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

I notice in your first post you said you feel mentally drained. You are about to turn a corner and you will start to feel empowered and you will be taking control of things rather than being intimidated and frustrated by these people.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really can't thank you enough for your help today, it's much appreciated. My situation with capital one has been a complete nightmare.I actually feel like I might get somewhere now, so thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..... Still receiveing calls from them, but it's capital one bank again now- makes a change form debitas's number. It's been two calls already today!

 

Letters typed up and ready to go. Their 'reasoning' behind not sending me statements or giving me online access to my account is because the account 'defaulted' in October 2010. However regular payments of £57 odd per month were paid. I cannot see how that has any bearing on the present problem anyway.

Edited by mrsfedup
Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick update. Trading standards say they cannot deal with the complaint. I have forwarded it to the other bodies though, had no calls since earlier in the week- that's some progress at least!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the harrasement letter to:- Mr. Brian Cole, Chief Executive Officer, and bring to his attention what is going on , send Recorded delivery and keep a record of dealings, as far as sending monies send/suggest a figure you can easily afford but be clever do not actually acknowledge an actual debt/only assum might be handy later, do not phone them as call centres are only interested in collecting money and not sorting out your problems, Debitas well are muppets.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...