Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IB to ESA migration worry


poollie1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As for not being followed, I understood those going for medicals where "watched" leaving their cars to go into the centres, and that the assessment start from when you left your transport there.

 

This makes sense. I know this has happened to me when I've been for DLA tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparky, pleased to hear you have a good result, as I understand the procedure for IB claimants being migrated to ESA the burden of proof lies with the DM to prove you are fit for work, your supporting evidence obviously proved you were not, hence support goup without an assessment.The burden of proof lies with existing and new claimants of ESA to prove they are not fit for work, hope I got that right? Rover87 the old Invalidity claimants are exempt from paying tax as I am. We were all transferred over to Incapacity when it came into force but only new claimants had to pay tax. Jamey125 it took 4 weeks from sending form off to receiving assessment date, although it does vary, I know someone who has been waiting 7 weeks, hope this helps.Orlok I also was lead to believe you are watched from the moment you enter the medical centre, but others who are reporting being followed say they are followed from their homes into the medical centre car park. They wont be able to follow me into the car park because there isn"t one, unfortunately I have to park in a public car park and walk the rest of the way, which is quite a long way away, I requested a home visit but was denied one.

Edited by poollie1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Orlock - Sorry, I had not realised you were previously on Invalidity benefit. Incapacity benefit is taxable though for everyone else unless you were in the first 6 months or something...although new claims were abolished a few years ago. You only pay tax though if you earn more than your tax allowance.

 

I'm not convinced anyone would be following you - even if they did what good could it do them? It wouldn't be mentioned in the Atos report as it is not part of the assessment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see it would do any good either, maybe they are trying to discredit our evidence, for instance I have stated I am only able to sit or stand for 10 mins at a time without feeling pain and discomfort making it difficult for me to travel to the medical centre without having to stop the car after 10 mins to relieve the pressure on my spine,( hoping I would be granted a home visit but that was denied) maybe that is cause to follow me to see if this is true.I cant understand why people would say this if it were not true, what would they gain from lying?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have been transferred from IB to ESA without a medical and put in the support group, well that's what I've been told over the telephone, but haven't had it in writing yet. I sent my ESA form in in July 2011, and upto now my payments into my bank account still say IB, so don't know whats happening, I was going to write to the DWP, but not sure where to send it.

 

Hi Sparky514

 

Have a read of this

 

About moving from IB to ESA http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Illorinjured/DG_171894

 

Customers moving onto Employment and Support Allowance from incapacity benefits

 

You'll be told whether you're in the Support Group or Work-Related Activity Group after the review of your claim to:

 

  • Incapacity Benefit
  • Income Support paid on the grounds of illness or disability
  • Severe Disablement Allowance

See 'How it works' section above for more information.

Your benefit will be transferred automatically and there will be no break in the payments you receive.

If the amount of incapacity benefit you get is more than the amount of Employment and Support Allowance, you’ll get a top-up payment. The amount of benefit you get won't rise until the amount of Employment and Support Allowance catches up with the amount of the top-up payment.

If the amount of incapacity benefit you get is lower than the amount of Employment and Support Allowance, you will get more money. Your money will increase as soon as you move to Employment and Support Allowance.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all a big con, i have recieved incap and DLA since 2006, i have recently been for an atos medical where i was reansferred onto esa in the work related activity group, i am severely disabled and can barely walk because of pin at the best of times, i have just recieved a letter revealing thier real plans, it says as follows:

 

The government wants to change how long ESA can be paid for some people, the change has not been approved by parliament yet, but if this happens it will become law by spring 2012

 

this proposal is in the welfar reform bill which is currently going through parliament, changes may be made during the process, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2012,

 

we are writing to you because if the change becomes law it will affect your benefit, you currently get contribution based ESA, and you have been put in the work related activity group, the government want to limit how long you can get this to 12 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

45002, what you say is correct, former invalidity/ incapacity claimants do get transferred automatically with no break in payments providing they pass, but these claimants such as myself who has been on invalidity/incapacity since 1993 still have to go through the migration process and pass the assessment to qualify for ESA, I am going through the process at the moment, assessment date 17th October. Another thing IB claimants must remember when attending an assessment to be migrated to ESA is that the burden of proof lies with the DM and therefore for the DM to gather their own evidence to prove that the claimant is fit for work, if they do not do this and the claimant fails the assessment that is very good cause for appeal, whereas the burden of proof lies with a new or existing ESA claimant to prove they are not fit for work and therefore collect their own supporting evidence, these are the differences between the two claimants, everything else is exactly the same process.And Horus1 that is also correct, if a claimant is placed in the work related group any payments will stop after 12 months, if of course this is passed in parliment and will take affect from April 2012.

Edited by poollie1
Link to post
Share on other sites

45002, what you say is correct.......

 

poollie1

 

I not said anything,It's just a quote from direct gov website,I posted for Sparky514 who in the Support group..............................

 

See the link at #30

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

45002, Sorry I misunderstood you, I thought you was infering all existing IB claimants got transferred automatically without the need for an assessment, which of course some claimants do without the need for an assessment because they supplied enough supporting evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my letter this am, I'm being moved to ESA from the end of this month. I did not have to attend an interview, but did have to fill out an assessment form (ES50?), and will be getting £99.85 plus a top-up payment.

 

I have been worried sick for months since they announced this, but in the end it was completely painless. I did not send any evidence other than a list of medicines, but i would imagine they would have written to my doctor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orlok, thats good news for getting transferred without an assessment, it seems as if you have been put into the work related group if your payment is going to be £99.85 plus the top up payment, this is the difference between the work related payment and your existing payment. My question to you would be, are you happy at being placed into the work related group if this is the case? or do you think you should be in the support group?. If you think you should be in support group you only have one month from when the decesion was made to put in an appeal. I would suggest you ask the decesion maker for a statement of reasons as to why you have been placed into the work related group if this is the case, also as to wether the DM sought evidence regarding your case as the burden of proof lies with the DM to prove you are fit for work. If the DM has not sought evidence then you have very good course to put in an appeal, but remember you only have a month to do this. The DM"s do not always contact your gp/consultants. I would also ask for a copy of ATOS report.

Edited by poollie1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Poolie, but I am in the support group, the weekly amount for the WRAG is £94.25. The top-up payment is indeed the difference between my present IB and ESA. The Long term IB rate is actually the same as ESA WRAG, so if I had been on that I would have got £5.60 extra and no top-up, but I was still getting the top-up to my IB that replaced the pension and age related components of Invalidity Benefit (that was frozen at the rate in was when IB started).

 

I didn't realise that ESA WRAG was the same rate as IB, with the support group being more. Also the All Work Test is more strict than the WCA. So in theory the new benefit should have been a lot fairer and more generous than IB, but because of its administation and ATOS it has worked out very unfair.

 

This also demonstrates how generous the old Invalidity benefit was (that was based on sick note from your own doctor that had to be taken to the then DHSS office). Even after being frozen for 15 years the difference between IB and Invalidity is still double the difference between the 2 ESA groups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orlok glad to hear you got the right result, Just an update on my claim, ESA50 form went back to Atos 26th August, assessment date came through the letterbox scheduled for 17th October, since sending the ESA50 back I have been diagnosed with more illnessess by my GP, dangerously high blood pressure, high cholesterol and angina. GP has prescribed 4 more different medications for these conditions and sent me straight to Cardiology for a rapid assessment. I went to Cardiology yesterday ande consultant has informed me I require an Angiogram, I will be having this procedure done in the next couple of weeks. My question is should I inform Atos and the DM of my change in circumstances since they received my ESA50 before I go for the WCA? or just take the evidence with me to the assessment? any ideas please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I filled out my ESA50 I had been for my angiogram and was waiting for angiplasty, had angina, my blood pressure has never been high, and my cholesterol is controlled by drugs. I've been having heart problems for about 10 years, had 3 angio grams and 3 lots of angioplasty. Had several heart attacks and many bouts of angina.

 

I'm not sure how it works if your condition worsens after you've sent off your ESA50, but I think you should tell them. After your angiogram you'll know what you need to have done. It depends how bad your angina is, but if you need to use your GTN more than a few times a day even if you do nothing you'll probably need angioplasty or more. I'm not a doctor though so you'll have to wait until your results, that's just what I was told.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Orlok, I think you misunderstood me, I didn"t have this condition when I sent the ESA50 form off to Atos, my claim is for other illnessess, my Angina has only just been diagnosed so wondered wether it would be best to let DWP and Atos know before assessment that my health has deteriorated with yet another illness, or just take the evidence of the new illness to the assessment with me. I"m thinking if I let them know before they may reconsider as to wether I need an assessment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did realise what you meant, but I think the DWP should be made aware of your new condition. I have other problems in adition to my heart but I got moved straight into the support group without having to have a medical. If you let them know of your heart problems you may not need to go to an medical either. They seem to ignore peoples' problems and make things up at the medicals so it seems best to avoid them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Orlok, How do you suggest I let them know, by Telephone or by writing to them? also what would you say to them if you were in my situation, cos I think your right, at assessment they seem to make it up as they go along so to avoid one would be a great relief to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let Atos know of my new illnesse"s by Email, no reply as yet and also by letter, recorded delivery, could not find Email address for DWP so just sent a letter again recorded delivery. Since doing that went to see my GP Monday and had an Angina attack whilst at rest in his surgery, he got an ambulance and straight off to hospital I went, stayed there over night to be monitered, blood tests , Ecg etc, they let me home this lunchtime. If a person has an Angina attack whilst at rest, this is classed as unstable Angina, I think I have read somewhere that this condition is not called to a face to face assessment. Anyone else read this?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had that and wasn't called in for a medical, got put straight into support group. Although I can't be certain what the reason was as i didn't bother to get a statement of reasons, and my heart is not my only problem.

 

I actually read that it used to give you automatic pass of IB test but they dropped that for ESA (but then I still got called to IB medicals). That makes no sense though, as the criteria for IB is more strict than for ESA. The CAB also documented the case of someone who was waiting for open heart surgery being passed as fit for work. I don't think anybody truly knows about ESA, even the people that administer it seem to have little clue what they are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...