Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo@Nicky Boyi sent across the agreement earlier in this thread. No mention of financial reward to the MA. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was done on the sly. As I said earlier, the owner of OPS is a convicted criminal, with a very shady reputation around these parts.
    • The average high street easy-access account pays 1.7% interest - but savers could earn 5% if they moved their money elsewhere. We look at which banks have the top rates.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Husband's 18year old mortgage debt landed on our doorstep today. I'm terrified.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4012 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Thanks for your kind thought, I hope everything stays peacefull and quiet for you!!!

 

Have a very happy Christmas:whoo:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 822
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

POD

 

Have a good Christmas and a much better 2013 !!! Provided those bl**dy Mayans are wrong about tomorrow.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

in there not out there...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in there not out there...

 

dx

 

??????????

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOpps! sorry!!

 

Uncle B,

I got the quote from the song wrong! D'Oh!

its the other half that's the Pink Floyd fan.

That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!

 

It's the Christmas sherry then:shock:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello everybody and a Happy New Year to everyone except.....

 

We received a letter from the lovely SS's today. I note thay have rebranded their stationary, nice to have the money to spend on such fripperies!

 

Anyhow, they note their 'client' gave a 'full response to our queries/ complaint, raised in January last year, which were issued in March last year' and since then have received 'no settlement proposals in respect of our outstanding liability'

 

They enclose some forms requesting my OH's financial details and 'wish to arrange a monthly payment plan', (that would be 'til the end of time then) or alternatively that their 'client would be prepared to accept a one off lump sum'...they make it sound like a great offer available only to us...bargain rates, sale ends next week... etc

 

There is also a paragraph stating that these offers are 'strictly in respect of our liability alone and they reserve the right to pursue all other parties to the mortgage including any guarantors for the remaing sum outstanding

 

Whatever that lot means

 

So guys, have I missed something here????

 

Was'nt it in November that the FOS informed us that there investigation into our complaint against the H complaint was ongoing???

 

What are SS's , with their fancy new stationary, playing at????

Answers on a postcard......

Link to post
Share on other sites

SS's ??

 

that a discount letter [begging letter]

 

which is always good news

 

means they know they dont have a leg to stand to goto court

 

the rest is just waffle to frighten you to make contact DON'T!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of their letter, together with a copy of the FOS letter from November, reminding SS's that the FOS are currently dealing with the matter. No need to say anything more, as their letter has been sent by mistake. They are not supposed to send these letters while the matter is still under review by the FOS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of their letter,

 

The one that came today?

 

] their letter has been sent by mistake.

 

Really, I thought these guys didnt make mistakes??

 

They are not supposed to send these letters while the matter is still under review by the FOS

 

Yes that was my understanding of it too.....

 

So something in the order of...

May I remind you that this matter is still under review by the FOS and contacting me in this way contravenes the (what????) you naughty, naughty SS's

 

Shall I wait 'til the weekend just in case they know something I don't

ie a letter is on the way from the FOS saying all hope is lost, go directly to jail, do no pass Go, do not collect £200....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of their letter,

 

The one that came today?

 

] their letter has been sent by mistake.

 

Really, I thought these guys didnt make mistakes??

 

They are not supposed to send these letters while the matter is still under review by the FOS

 

Yes that was my understanding of it too.....

 

So something in the order of...

May I remind you that this matter is still under review by the FOS and contacting me in this way contravenes the (what????) you naughty, naughty SS's

 

Shall I wait 'til the weekend just in case they know something I don't

ie a letter is on the way from the FOS saying all hope is lost, go directly to jail, do no pass Go, do not collect £200....

 

Yes a copy of their letter and a copy of the FOS letter. I would not bother writing out another letter. Just write on their letter. Think you have sent this in error, as this matter is still under review by the FOS, as per their last letter. Then just put in an envelope.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. I doubt that SS would be aware of anything, as they would have put something in their letter about the FOS decision, if they had been. They would have put something like. Now look here you daft mare, the FOS have told you that you have lost, so pay up or else.

 

If Halifax have not been able to get hold of the payment details, then I can't see the FOS ruling in their favour. I am pretty sure the FOS would view this the same as a court, that if there is no evidence of the payments being made by the mortgage holder, then it would be difficult to rule in favour of the mortgage company. If the debt collection agency (DCA) had kept better records, then this would have been decided by now. So it is pretty fortunate that the DCA were rubbish with their record keeping in this case.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep a copy of what they sent and your response for your own records.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the original letter/forms and bumph back to SS's with a note written on it (keeping a copy of this for my records)

and a copy of the last letter from the FOS.... 1st class ? Recorded delivery???

 

Just a thought.....

on the letter from the FOS they show my name, which is not the same as my husbands, as i am his authorised contact for the FOS...

Now do I want SS's or the H to have that information...

Should I delete/ obscure it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a standard letter. SS obviously did not realise that the FOS were still involved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys, Uncle B,the Brig

 

Well we received the final decision from the FOS this morning,

 

I knew time was ticking down and have been dreading it and I was right, I'm afraid....

it's not good news! :sad:

 

they have based their decision.....

'on the balance of probabilities...ie what (they)consider is most likely to have happened in the light of the evidence'

 

They say thay are........

'satisfied the H contacted (my OH) within the 6 year period, and that he made payments toward that shortfall up until 2000 and do not consider the H have treated him unfairly'

they also state that

'they do not consider that the H acted without due diligence in marketing and selling the flat'

 

so they will not uphold the complaint.....

 

they have included a little card for us to return by May 13th, either.....

 

accepting their decision which will become legally binding (AAAGGhhhh!!!)

 

or rejecting the decision,which will apparently not affect any legal rights he may have.....

 

which seems to be an interesting turn of phrase...what legal rights may we have??????

 

Absolutely none I suspect.

 

So guys, that's us down the Swannee is it????

 

:help::help:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...