Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

About to be falsely accused of stealing money from the workplace


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

In March, £500 pounds went "missing" from the workplace. The guys counted all the money from all the tills on the Friday and counted it up and bagged it. They sealed a bag of notes that wasn't meant to be sealed as it was missing the slip for the amount lodged. The problem is that two guys count all the money. They are adamant that all the money was in the bag. However, since the bag had to be cut open, because they sealed the bag without the slips, and I needed to write up the cheque/lodgment slip and put the money into the new bag, the opening of the bag was done in one of those guys presence. I had to transfer the notes from one bag to another, the two guys left the office, as it's normal procedure for one person to seal the bags(which is wrong IMO). I am now left in a very vulnerable situation here.

 

There is no CCTV inside the counting rooms at all and their is no way to prove that I did take the money. But am I correct in saying they can still fire me by ruling out the other two guys and the counting company. I don't want to lose my job, but that's not important, what is important is that I know they are about to accuse me of stealing, which they cannot prove and which I did not do. All the blame seems to be lying at my feet for something as to which I did not do. Can I take a polygraph or something to prove my innocence? Or if not what action can I take if they fire me for stealing without proving it?

 

I feel helpless.

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John

 

I really feel for you as it is devastating to be accused of something which you know you have not done, but cannot prove.

 

The bad news is that if, after a reasonable investigation, the company have reasonable belief that you committed the act, then in law, a disciplinary sanction is justified, and for theft, there would be very few employers who would not dismiss and be on fairly safe grounds. Unfortunately too, there is no automatic right to take a polygraph, or even to demand a Police investigation. That is wrong, but sadly the way it is - employment law demands a far lower burden of proof than criminal law.

 

As to what you can do? Quite frankly I don't know beyond emphasising your innocence and incredulity that you should be accused in this way, highlighting the flaws in the company's cash handling procedures and suggesting any other way in which the money could have gone missing. You must cast as much doubt as possible on their belief that you are guilty.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt harm you offering to your firm for them to send you for a polygraph as it would show your position that you will do all you can to prove it is not you who took the money.

 

Wether they take it up is up to them, but even if you do lose your job you could provide proof you offered to sit a polygraph that you are not dishonest for use of future employer xx

 

Heres hoping they instead rethink their cash procedures and dont blame you.

 

Best of luck, sorry to hear you are going through this xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual sound advice. As the advice appears to be that you are not in a strong position. Perhaps you should be thinking, I didn't steal the money so who did and how and when could it have been done?

 

Evidently you were in a vulnerable position working with two others. Looking at the scenario perhaps writing what happened down will help catch the thief or theives.

 

If you are certain that the money was there before the bag was sealed think the question is why did your colleagues not follow procedure? Leaving you to count and re-seal the bags. I expect you have considered this but certainly your employees have brains and would wonder what actually happened.

 

I think I'd be thinking as your employee that if you stole the money you hadn't thought it through as the finger would definately be on you. Do you think this was a genuine mistake by your colleagues or are they responsible for the theft? Got to be one or the other. I'd be .............. furious if they had done this to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite- the answer to that is that's why John has started this thread.

 

This is so difficult. Have you considered going to your employers. I'm not advising you to, that's not my place, just wondered if you would feel happier about doing that than waiting to be accused.

 

TAG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your situation, its really unfortunate.

 

The key thing is the investigation that is going to take place in relation to this matter. Have a look at ACAS guide on disciplinary and grievance procedures, which is on their website, which describes good practices, so you can be aware if there is anything that isn't right. Hopefully the investigation is going to be reasonable and fair. The question then from the employer's point of view is, based on the evidence we have gathered from this investigation, can we dismiss this employee for a fair reason ( ie misconduct or gross misconduct- theft.) To answer that they have to ask themselves (i)do we believe he is guilty (2) do we have reasonable grounds for forming this belief ( i.e good evidence from the investigation), (3) was the investigation reasonable in the circumstances. If they think yes to all three they may conclude that they should dismiss you. So long as they can show that they acted reasonably in dismissing you, ( basically all of the above) then sorry, they can dismiss you. The investigation and the evidence gathered is KEY right now. You need to get prepared for the investigation/hearing and/or appeal. If it goes to tribunal, the tribunal will look at all these issues and will decide if its reasonable for your employer to have chosen to dismiss you based on the information/evidence they had available to them, the ET will decide if ie that reasonable employer would have dismissed you in the circumstances ( objective test) All the best with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...