Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with esa50 form


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4627 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The letter you've provided gives information regarding diagnosis and treatment, but does not give information that is specific to descriptors. However, dependant on what your limitations are specific to the descriptors, certain things may be inferred from the diagnosis.

 

Can you go through the descriptors, pick out the ones which apply to you and then give real life examples of how the descriptors apply to you. Post it on here if you want to and think it will help, but this is a good first step before completing the ESA50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks for your reply leemack, one of the reasons i put the letter in the forum

was to see if it would be good enough to support my case or would i need to get

another one as this one is a few years old but still nothing as changed. my neck is

still broke and im still in constant pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, in order to pass the 'assessment', you need to score enough points on the descriptors. Medical evidence can help to give them a reason to believe the difficulties you have, but the most important thing is preparing with regards to the descriptors. The computer system used to assess you doesn't take into account what medical evidence you have, and its the answers you give to the questions and the way that you approach the 'assessment' that will determine whether you pass or fail. Medical evidence (if the atos assessor actually reads it) will only be supplementary to the assessment and unless it speaks directly about your abilities with relation to the descriptors, will not be preferred above the computer based assessment.

 

But to answer your question, your letter just gives a diagnosis - whether from 2009 or 2011 this has limited value with an ESA 'assessment', where a diagnosis means very little except if its a terminal one or speaks to treament that gets you an exemption. Apart from this, the descriptors are ALL they are concerned with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what they write. The letter you have explains the damage. If an additional letter spoke to the descriptors you fill, then that would be useful.

Edited by leemack
Link to post
Share on other sites

... The computer system used to assess you doesn't take into account what medical evidence you have ...

 

That, leemack, sums up the dire mess of how the ill and disabled are treated in one totally messed up nutshell. Reminds me of many years ago when I worked in Materials Management run by an indifferent computer system. Somebody faxed around a cartoon (quite accurate as it happens) of a guy in the stores pointing to an item on the shelf. The indifferent storesman stating 'It's no good pointing to it, the computer says we haven't got any' ... :|

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That, leemack, sums up the dire mess of how the ill and disabled are treated in one totally messed up nutshell. Reminds me of many years ago when I worked in Materials Management run by an indifferent computer system. Somebody faxed around a cartoon (quite accurate as it happens) of a guy in the stores pointing to an item on the shelf. The indifferent storesman stating 'It's no good pointing to it, the computer says we haven't got any' ... :|

Rae.

 

You're absolutely right, I believe you could be sitting in obvious agony or struggling with breathing - or missing a leg, and if you answer the questions in the wrong way the computer would fail you - but then the system is only as good as the info being inputted - so the 'assessors' certainly have to have their portion of blame as well as the atos training system and the pressure to hit targets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies, would it be better if i get CAB to fill my form in as

i don't feel confident in filling in the form myself.....i phoned my doctors and

the secretary told me to write a letter to my doctor asking what i want the doctor to say in

the letter but not even sure what points i want the doctor to make in the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAB or a welfare rights can help you complete the form.

 

With you doctor, you could always go through the descriptors, write a statement stating your diagnosis, medication and describing the relevant problems you have - ie the ones related to the descriptors. At the bottom of the statement make a bit for the GP to sign that says something like 'I confirm that the diagnosis and medication above are accurate and that given this diagnosis, I believe that (insert your name) has the difficulties stated above. I have seen (insert your name) x times in the last year. signed (space for gp's name and qualifications and surgery stamp).

 

You don't need to provide any evidence for the assessment, though with any back/spine problems it may be useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

leemack your a gentleman thank you for all the advice you have given me so far,

you have been very helpful, just got appointment with CAB so hopefully will get

form sorted, as regards to the doctor he as gone on holiday for a week, so hopefully when form is

completed i will make a photocopy then send it in to the doctor for him to look at and give me a

supporting letter. Hopefully this will be ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hiya everyone. Just to update you, been to cab office this morning for help in filling my esa50 form, the woman i seen was

very helpful, so fingers crossed now to see what happens, will update you when i recieve more news.

thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck,

 

My ESA50 arrived in the post this morning and I've got until the beginning of September to get it back to them in Croydon.

 

I plan to sit down and read leemack's sticky after the weekend when I've got some time to concentrate.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Honeybee will let you know what happens. Good luck with that Feebee but

try and get some help with filling the form in ie:CAB. Leemack's sticky made very interesting reading,

hope it helps you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian, I don't have a link - others might. I'm currently working on a guide with honeybee, though its been delayed by personal matters and my own ill health - hopefully will be ready in a week or two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

 

Leemack's own health isn't too smart at the moment and this is a big project with her doing most of the work. I'm sure she'll produce it as soon as she can. Someone posted a link to a copy of the form itself which I can post if you like.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LeeMack...are you able to gibe me a link to the ESA50 how to complete the new forms please? This is my second time around bu the forms have changed since january wehn they were last done

thanks

Ian

 

New form can be found here

 

MrH.

Hopefully one day all dca's will be history

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

 

Of course we appreciate the time and effort put in by Leemack - she has helped me so much already with queries about benefits.

 

I wish her all the best and hope she has a positive turn in her health situation very soon,

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...