Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4733 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been with the same motor insurer for some years and always renewed by phone. I've always been asked if I agree to my insurance being renewed automatically and always made it clear that I don't.

 

A week or so ago I made the yearly phone call and renewed (after a bit of chat and negotiation of course). As always I paid the premium in full. This time I was told that my insurance would automatically renew using the payment details I had given and I made it very clear that I did NOT grant continuous authority. The girl on the other end of the phone just laughed so I repeated the instruction until she grudgingly said "OK".

 

I immediately emailed the company insisting they confirm in writing that my records show my instruction. The reply, received today, was as follows:

I can confirm that your motor insurance is now (my bold) not on inertia renewal therefore next year you will have to call us to renew your motor insurance policy.

 

It's that little word 'now' which I find interesting. I have never had a policy on inertia renewal even though we have two cars insured with the company and have done for years. I now have a strong feeling my instructions were ignored by telesales staff, presumably to meet some target. Good job I insisted on it being checked and confirmed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been with the same motor insurer for some years and always renewed by phone. I've always been asked if I agree to my insurance being renewed automatically and always made it clear that I don't.

 

A week or so ago I made the yearly phone call and renewed (after a bit of chat and negotiation of course). As always I paid the premium in full. This time I was told that my insurance would automatically renew using the payment details I had given and I made it very clear that I did NOT grant continuous authority. The girl on the other end of the phone just laughed so I repeated the instruction until she grudgingly said "OK".

 

I immediately emailed the company insisting they confirm in writing that my records show my instruction. The reply, received today, was as follows:

I can confirm that your motor insurance is now (my bold) not on inertia renewal therefore next year you will have to call us to renew your motor insurance policy.

 

It's that little word 'now' which I find interesting. I have never had a policy on inertia renewal even though we have two cars insured with the company and have done for years. I now have a strong feeling my instructions were ignored by telesales staff, presumably to meet some target. Good job I insisted on it being checked and confirmed.

 

This is getting worse. Because retention rates have dived and continue to do so, the Insurers are making it more difficult not to renew. I suspect that some Insurers have also reduced the number of staff answering cancellation calls. Having worked with IT/telephony systems in the Insurance industry, it has always been the case that companies prioritise sales calls including those wanting to renew and allow longer queuing times for cancellation calls. This is why you get a long list of options when you phone e.g. press 1 for sales, 2 for customer services and then a longer list of options for customer services.

 

So you did the right thing Hightail to ask for the auto renewal switch off to be confirmed to you. Just make sure you check the renewal letter when received, just in case a 'computer glitch' switches it back on again in time for renewal. It should not happen, but it is not unheard of. Some of the IT systems these companies use, are not as reliable as you would think they would be.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You renewed, it went onto inertia renewal you asked for it not to be, their use of now was correct.

 

My point exactly. When I renewed by phone I made it clear that it should not go onto inertia renewal and their use of 'now' shows that my express instructions were ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...