Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures cosigned by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The DEfendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt with former employer***Claim Dismissed & Costs awarded***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Zoltron we need to speed this up a tad otherwise it will be Thurs before we even start to draft:-)

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry had an emergency situation arise one of my children had to be rushed into hospital and had to kept overnight.... Sorry

 

The address of the County Court issuing the claim was Dudley County Court, to be honest my wife never had the original summons hence the set aside she never knew nothing about the claim until the bailiffs were about to come hammering the door down, however a copy of the summons was requested when the N244 for the set aside went in.

 

I had been tinkering with a defence what I had seen on another post which is similar to this claim, I just moved a few things around its not finished but maybe you have something else planned.

 

Kind Regards

 

Lee

 

 

Draft defence below

1. I __________ are the Defendant inthis action and make the following statement as my Defence to the claim made by______________

2. Except where otherwise mentioned inthis Defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the Claimants Particularsof Claim and put the Claimant to strict proof thereof.

3. The Defendant is embarrassed inpleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

4. The Claimants particulars of claim arevague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse ofthe process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading inaccordance with the CPR.

a) Acopy of the purported written agreement that the Claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears toform the basis upon which these proceedingshave been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

b) A copy of any evidence of boththe scope and nature of any default, and proof ofany amount outstanding on the alleged account, has not been served attached to the claim form.

5. Notwithstanding matters pleaded, it isdenied that the Claimant has established a cause of action or that the Claimanthas a valid claim against the Defendant.Consequently, it is proving difficult to plead to the particulars as mattersstand.

6. On the ************, I wrote to theClaimant requesting disclosure of information pursuant to the Civil ProcedureRules, the request was made on the balance of probability the claim would beset aside, these documents are vital to forming a Defence. No reply has beenreceived prior to submitting this Defence.

7. The courts attention is drawn to thefact that the without disclosure of the requested documentation pursuant to theRules, I have not yet had the opportunity to asses if the documentation whichthe claimant claims to be relying upon to bring this action even contains theprescribed terms required in Consumer Credit Act and that a lawful assignment to the Claimant did occur.

8. The Claimant is therefore put tostrict proof that such compliant documents exist.

9. It is neither admitted nor denied thatany Default Notice in the prescribed format was ever received and the Defendantputs the Claimant to strict proof that said document in the prescribed formatwas delivered to the Defendant.

10. The Defendant avers thatit is further incumbent upon the Claimant to serve a Termination Notice beforeany proceedings are commenced. The Defendant does not admit service of a validTermination Notice. The Claimant is put to strict proof as to the service,content and validity thereof.

11. The Defendant denies that there hasbeen any failure to make payment in accordance with the alleged contract. TheClaimant has failed to produce a copy of a credit agreement at all, and in theabsence of such an agreement, which conforms to sections 60 and 61 of theConsumer Credit Act 1974, the Defendant avers that no agreement has everexisted for there to have been any failure to make said payment.

12. Without Disclosure of the relevantdocumentation I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable to the Claimant, noram I able to assess if the alleged agreement is properly executed, contain therequired prescribed terms, or correct figures to make such an agreementenforceable by virtue of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

13. In view of the matters pleaded above,I respectfully request that the court gives consideration to whether theClaimant's statement of case should be struck out as disclosing no reasonablegrounds for bringing the claim, and/or that it fails to comply with CPR Part16.

14. Alternatively, Should the court orderthe Claimant to produce the necessary documentation. I will then be in aposition to file a fully particularised Defence and counterclaim and will seekthe court’s permission to amend my statement of case accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a quick look that seems fine I'm sure the site team will take a look to.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Z

 

Ok the above is fine for your defence should you secure the S a S and then will be invited to submit a full particularised defence.For the actual hearing to decide the S a S far less will be required. Just a simple was never received should be good enough for the hearing and then the above will come into play when the DJ invites you to then submit.Have you been ordered to submit a full defence by tomorrow?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Judge just said to enter a defence by the 13th July as if the case were just starting again from the start, and then the claimant would then be able to offer a reply to the defence within 14 days of the 13th July deadline. Just wanted to get the defence off tomorrow by recorded delivery so it arrives well inside the deadline.

 

I'm assuming with the courts permission my wife can then enter a fully pleaded defence once more info has surfaced, but nothing has come through as yet to the CPR 18 request, not sure as to send it again now the matter has been set aside, but I suppose the only items my wife could really expect are statements as the admission of no CA or DN.

 

In the meantime my wife is considering writing to the claimant asking for his discontinuance of the claim and any monies he claims is owed and she will offer to wavier her costs just to see what comes of it, at least to the court its a way of trying to put the matter to bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I think your on the right track, you can always consult the court staff on procedures

if needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update, my wife had from the court confirmation that the defence had been entered on Friday. However attached to the confirmation letter was an Allocation questionnaire for small track claims to be sent back to the court by 1st August 2011. Is there anything which should be attached to the questionnaire when sending it back. Seems like a simple document to complete just wondered if she should attach anything to it such as a witness statement considering no reply to the defence has been seen yet or probably won't see until near the 1st August deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There aren't any documents you need to send,

just follow the instructions on the form.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoltron

 

As you state quite simple to complete but in the "other" section (G ) you can request any documentation you are missing or require.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both for the reply

 

I have completed today and handed into the court, so just wait and see what develops.

 

I've still had no reply to the letter I sent to the claimant asking for discontinuance.

 

Just a quickie, when the actual case gets to a full hearing can my wife request that I represent her in her absence as her work have been and can be a bit nasty about her taking time off the closer we get to the Autumn months. I don't work due to disablity and could if required represent her.

 

If so is there a specific request that has to be made to the court

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can act as a Mackenzie friend but your wife would have to attend see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?308509-capquest-chasing-old-citi-card-ppi-reclaim-too

 

Page 3 for my link Post 51

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just to update you all on this, as i've been away recovering from various surgical procedures.

 

The judge basically threw out the claimants claim, as he did not provide when requested a copy of the agreement, a default notice, and was unable to supply any further information.

 

My wife was awared her full costs of £320, the judge told the claimant as he is a credit supplier to get his house in order, and that this should be a lesson to him in bad accounting.

 

Sounded fair enough to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoltron, this is really good news :)

 

I hope you are now recovering your surgery :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done zoltron delighted for you and yours.

 

I will amend your thread title to reflect the result.

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...