Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Support for Mortgage interest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help with an housing benefit claim?

 

In 2000, an house was purchase and in 2006 there was a re-mortgage.

In 2009 unfortunately there was a claim for housing benefit due to unemployment.

I must add that there has been extensive work carried out at the said property that has increase the property value significantly.

Also the claimant is 38 yrs old and it is the first time ever to have made any benefits claims.

 

After numerous attempts since last October for an explanation as to why there is such a short full of payment towards the interest only via telephone and by letter, they (benefit office) have just sent a reply of an explanation. Their explanation is vague so runs short of a full understanding as to why this is.

The benefits office is using the original mortgage as the bases of their calculations.

 

The original mortgage was £145,000

The re-mortgage is now (from 2006) £258,000

 

Any advice regarding this will be hugely appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also it only covers the initial mortgage, unless the remortgage was for essential works - and you would need to prove the money paid for the essential works - with receipts etc. They don't care if the property value was increased, only if the work was essential - so if you needed a new roof, or a boiler, or a wall rebuilt or insulation, then that might be considered essential, but things like extensions, loft conversions, internal non essential renovations or decorating would not be covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the house was purchased the claimant and partner had only 2 children. Since then there has been an additional 3 more children which was the plan, hence why the renovations was done. Also the 2 older children have now come of age and require their own rooms.

The work undertaken included complete new electrics, heating system, new kitchen and roofing as well has additional rooms. All work that took place was done at a high standard and is well insulated which is environmentally friendly to which society has encourage us all to do.

None of us all can foresee what the future brings as far as the economy gos, so it came as a complete shock when they (the claimant) found their-self unemployed for the first time in their life.

It has also been mentioned just recently that they could have a claim regarding PPI but again they are not getting any co-operation from the mortgage broker. They are quite certain that they were charged for this.

As you can imagine all this has taken it's toll on their health.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing that can be done is appeal the mortgage interest decision, send in a long letter giving explanations of why the works were essential and providing receipts for all the work. The trick is convincing them that it was essential work, which is really difficult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. Can u explain why it will be difficult when it's so obvious?

 

What a sensible person considers essential and what the DWP consider essential can be two different things. Get a benefit caseworker if possible and get them to argue the points for you. Some of the work may be acceptable, but I've seen new kitchens and extra bedrooms rejected before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I can't get my head around is for example: If someone purchased their property say 20 yrs ago and in this time, rather move on and upgrade they decide to do extensive work, maybe several times throughout this period and as history tell us property go's up in the long run, then all of a sudden because of bad economic & politics they found themselves unemployed, they could loose their home because by this time the original mortgage may only be a fraction of what the re-mortgage is now. Also what makes this worse is that people could loose their homes with say just 5yrs left to go on mortgage contract because of a massive short full in payments, heart breaking especially after paying good tax's all their working life!

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.....When politician's put in a claim they just go to the gravy train and dip in.

May have to plant a few more seeds as I did in 2007. Never did close the book over this affair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I had to do essential work on my old house, I borrowed about £20,000.

I moved into my present house while still working.

When I lost my job the DWP told me that although they agreed the work on my old house was essential to my family, as the house improvements were for another house then they would not help me with the payments.

It is a crazy system.

I am now struggling but stuck here as I cannot get a mortgage even on a cheaper house while unemployed.

The mortgage company told me to go to the citizens advice if I was having trouble and they would help me with a budget.

That is not much help, unless the citizens advice can help me print money then there is nothing that can be done.

You will soon realise like I have that there is no real help out there for house holders no matter what people tell you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi leemack. Just looking at the reply sent from you at 12:21am on18/05/11. You say here "They don't care if the property value was increased, only if the work was essential". What was meant by value was that given time all property will increase in value. If given choice some will move to upgrade and some will stay and expand on plot if this is an option.

If there is more children added to the family unit then surely this should be classed as essential as it is for MP's to claim 2nd home's to be nearer Parliament!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next part I understand that there was PPI tide to this mortgage as I have already stated. There has been attempts made to the named mortgage company to see if there are/was PPI to this contract but it seems to have fallen on death ears. Can anyone give any guidance as to what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...