Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hey guys, just wanting to double check since it's been a a year since my last claims mediation, this is the best stance to have during the mediation right?: "I am willing to be flexible by not taking Evri to court to get a judgement against  them and i'm willing to settle now. but I'm not here to compromise on my rights or the amount i'm owed as I have all the rights in this claim and Evri know this, despite what they may say now. I do not wish to waste the courts time and our time, it's Evri who are being inflexible and they are just wasting evryones time if the are not just paying up now. they should just offer the full £ and we can proceed The function of mediation is not to persuade you to give up some of your rights. The function of mediation is to help you obtain what you are entitled to without having to go to court and without having to inconvenience or trouble anyone further. The benefit to the defendant is that they are saved the expense and the inconvenience of going to court." I can also bring up that 1. they no showed this court in our previous mediation call and wasted all our time, and 2. they already settled in full with me last year on an identical parcel and case so we're going down the same road?
    • Regarding SARs - does the recipient provide hard or digital copies of info?  I sent out a request recently. All the info was digital and I'd like it sent digitally - for expedience -  but they want to post hard copies.  Can I demand digitally?  If it's hard then I will have to labour over scanning it all back in to my computer - which is a waste of my resources.  I had this issue recently with a lawyer - they said they had too much info to send by email. Yet miraculously found a way within 2h. (It would be useful to have hard copies too - but in terms of short-term follow up communication digital is best for me)
    • As the tories declare they will do all sorts of err things they had already promised, and often actually themselves blocked,  including 40 hospitals policy, ground rent caps, abolishing no-fault evictions and restoring historic train lines .. all feature in the 2019 and 2024 documents.   .. in perhaps better news Man, 46, arrested in connection with criminal investigation into PPE Medpro | UK news | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Suspect understood to have been arrested on suspicion of offences including conspiracy to commit fraud  
    • 1000's of people here, Inc members of the team have on going issues like Mental health... But it shouldn't be used as a general get out excuse.  You vanished for a month doing nothing... . .....  Move on.  Dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clarity/ Cabot: No CCA given


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4775 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I hope I can get some advice here. And apologies if I'm asking obvious questions, I've looked around the site but couldn't find quite what I was looking for.

 

I recieved a letter in February from Clarity saying I owed £1500 on an old egg card I had 5-6 years ago. I thought I had paid it off at the time but since have moved house several times and my number has changed. If I did still owe any money it must have been close to £0 as I thought I'd paid it off.

 

I sent a CCA request to Clarity who told me they'd passed it back to Egg.

 

Then on 25th March I received a letter from Cabot saying they had requested the information and that they anticipated they could provide it in 12 days (my request was made a month previous!).

 

4th May a letter saying they were continuing to request info.

 

Also 4th May letter saying my account was on hold, they would continue to request for it and I should repay outstanding balance.

 

I haven't replied to anything after sending my initial CCA request. Should I keep quiet until they send me anything concrete?

 

Any advice is appreciated...

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could if you wish send a Subject Access Request to the original lender.. you might find information to prove that you have paid it off.

 

IMHO, you shouldnt need to do anything else with Cabot/Clarity until htey provide the information you have requested, especially as they are saying they have put any further action on hold until htey provide the information.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I thought that if a CCA wasn't provided in 12 days the debt was void?

Also the debt may be over 6 years old depending on when this is measured from. (from the day the card agreement was originally taken out?)

In which case does that mean the debt is void?

Thanks again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

void?

no poss un-en in a court

still doesn't make it go away.

 

SB is from last financial use in/out by YOU.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I thought that if a CCA wasn't provided in 12 days the debt was void?

Also the debt may be over 6 years old depending on when this is measured from. (from the day the card agreement was originally taken out?)

In which case does that mean the debt is void?

Thanks again...

 

After 12 + 2 days with no response, the Account is in Dispute and no actions can be taken until and if an enforceable Agreement is provided.

The Statute Barring of a debt runs from the last payment or acknowledgement from yourself.

 

Any debt is never 'void' it may be unenforceable in Court: Time Barred; but is never 'void'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...