Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please - with Cap 1 and FPC


Madcat333
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post ever - any help will be thankfully appreciated.

 

Cap 1 recently terminated my c/c acct and passed the chasing of the debt to FPC.

 

The first I knew of it was when I received a termination notice.

 

Upon receipt of the termination notice I rang Cap1 and was told a default notice had been sent out a month or so earlier and since I had done nothing in compliance with it they had taken things to the next level.

 

I stated that I had never received the notice and what should I do to resolve the issue. They told me FPC was the only course of action open to me.

 

I have no qualms about paying Cap 1 what I owe but feel that I have been treated unjustly by not having the notice served correctly in order for me to sort things out with them.

 

Cap 1 say they will not supply a copy of the default notice but tell me one was generated and posted.

 

All I want to do is pay them whats owed versus their statements and sort out the default issue. I do not require anything more from them.

 

FPC are pestering me to make an arrangement with them which I will not do ! They keep telling me I am "unwilling to pay" to which my reply is:- I pay money directly to Cap 1 who I owe it to - not third parties !

 

Once again any advice on dealing with Cap 1 would be appreciated.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for such a prompt reply ims.

 

As yet I have not looked into the charges side of things.

 

I was more worried about the DCA angle and their pestering.

 

I will certainly be ignoring the DCA from this moment onward.

 

I am a little concerned that Cap 1 have acted unreasonably and that I had a right to sort things out

with them under the default notice they are alleged to have sent.

 

Although I am continuing to make payments to them I want to apply some pressure in order for them

to rectify their mistake.

 

I'd be happy to receive statements from them and pay them without having the facility of a card, such is my distaste

towards them for their poor service.

 

Obviously I then have the problem of the default status on my CRA files to contend with.

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask on what basis a default notice was issued? I mean were you in arrears or was there a bad payment history? can you give some more info?

 

Why do you feel they issued a DN by mistake?

 

I'd certainly be looking into getting charges back as well.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly the same game now with them

 

been like it since last october

 

dont worry about freddies

 

they nor anydca can do stuff all to you

 

just pay cap1 what you can when you can by internet banking [NOT DD!]

 

oh and if freddies write or ring you at work

 

the TS are curently VERY interested in the letters/calls

 

freddies were warned of this twice in 2009 but have now changed name to FPC

and think they can just start up their old unlawful tactics again.

 

shock coming!!

 

they've been recorded three times now being told not to call a works number

even got the operations room [what?] supervisor to removed the number

 

still get 5-10 automated calles to the works

each is being logged recorded and sent to my TS contact.

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the Card since April 2006 - no real problems with meeting minimum monthly payments.

 

Around July time last year I was unable to make the full minimum payments

 

In September 2010 I approached Cap 1 to make an arrangement to pay minimum payment (approx. £170) plus a minimum additional £30.00 to clear the arrears.

 

They would not listen and would only accept things on their terms - £272 pcm for 6 months.

 

I told them it was unreasonable but made as good an effort as I could to repay.

 

I queried why they had amended the payment due date to the 3rd of the month from the 21st and was told not to worry about it.

 

Consequently they were heaping £24 per month on to each passing month in charges, which had they stuck to payment dates of the 21st would have been avoided.

 

I might have had small arrears by the time of the default notice. which if served for a breach of minimum payments (?) I would have accepted knowing that there was nothing that could not have been sorted within the period it allows to rectify things.

 

There has been no unwillingness to pay on my part - but dealing with them and getting them to appreciate and understand is nigh on impossible.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go for them for those unlawful charges plus compound interest. That will help with the o/s balance

 

As part of your claim you can request the default notice be removed as it was in wholly or in part due their unlawful charges.

 

In the meantime pay them what you can afford....you tell them what they are getting not the other way around.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks once again for the advice.

 

I am going to be putting the finishing touches to a letter over the weekend which I will be sending to their Nottingham Offices for the attention of Mr Liam Quegan.

 

I had cca'd them at the beginning of April 2011, as per some advice I had read in these forums.

 

He replied in letter form, dated 21 April 2011 received by me 3rd May 2011.

 

They supplied a copy of the Agreement which all looks in order, but he commented that they would not supply a copy of the default notice because they didn't have to.

 

Nor did he feel the need to discuss it further since they assure me one was posted !

 

He then corresponded to tell me FPC was the way to go !

 

Obviously I disagree - so it looks as if this might be the start of something lengthy in terms of getting things sorted.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think that they are right in that they don't have to supply a copy of DN.

 

Might not be as lengthy a process as you might think.

 

Have you got ALL of yur statements? If you have you won't need to SAR them and the procedure would be preliminary letter requesting charges back plus interest, followed by lba with the same request if there is no payment made. If they still don't cough then it is off to court with claim for charges + CI + Stat Int.

 

If you haven't got all your statements then SAR would be necessary to get them all and then revert to the procedure above.

 

They usually cough up before getting into the court.

 

ims

Edited by ims21
spelling

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi All.

 

Based on the above info I have continued to regularly pay Cap 1 an amount via standing order.

 

I am still receiving letters and phone calls from FPC/ Fredricksons which I have logged but not responded to.

 

However I have just received a letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors stating that they want to take me to Court unless I contact FPC and make an arrangement with them.

 

I will still continue to pay Cap 1 directly but am wondering about doing something with regards to the recent correspondence I received.

 

Thanking you in advance for any forthcoming advice.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

may. might,instructed, recommend

 

never WILL.

 

got all those letters in te same order three times over now

 

the balance will be wiped out with a penalty charges reclaim+unt at their rate

 

i stopped paying months ago now.

 

oneday i might fire off a charges reclaim

but i'll let the situation continue for now

as i want to see what willl happen to it.

 

if you can put up with the computer generatedrubbish then i would ignore them

 

got that SAR done yet?

 

on the DN front

they only have to show that the 'system' requested a DN be sent

they dont 'have' to have a copy

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...