Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for uploading them wrong. Im not technical at all and self taught so bear with me as im trying my best. Thank you for all the info regarding the signs, this was my thoughts as well. Yes they have changed teh signs since this happened Ill ahve to have a look back through and see if when I took the pictures they were already the new ones or I have the old ones. I cant remember off hand. With regards to Europarks running the site now, Just to make you aware there is another small retail park just across the road and Im sure they are Europarks. The shops within that park are just Aldi and B & M. The site that we received the NTK has a few more shops, Home bargains, The food Warehouse, M & S food and a few others. I put these for identififcation purposes just in case it is the other site that you were looking at. The main entrance sign is on the bend on the left as you drive in the entrance so when you drive in from the right and turn in you can see it in front of you but if you drive in from the other way as we do then you dont see it unless you know its there and as you say you would have to stop to read it al anywayl. The main thing that always jumped out at us was FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in large letters. Please find the notice of hearing date attached and an offer letter I received from the vultures DCBLegal this morning,    notice of allocation group nexus.pdf vulture offer letter re group nexus.pdf
    • Good Afternoon Stu,  Many thanks for your reply. I will do as you suggest and email them for the exact terms. I shall have a look through the Tenancy Agreement too  myself  
    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa Appeal turned down, can't claim Jobseekers allowence help me!!!


mandyjay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Kelcou - can you not qualify under the rules regarding that if you are found fit for work, this will cause you serious health problems? As I understand it, you have a lung / chest disease; so surely working and being around ill people (even those with just a cold) will make you very ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest, Nystagmite, I don't know about the rules you mention. Yes, I have Severe Chronic Bronchitus (stage 3), which puts my lung efficiency down to the 35-40% across the board. I am incredibly susceptible to anyone with a cold / flu! You probably recall me posting about the number of days sick I had last year apart from my general symptoms. End of December through to mid-march with one chest infection after another. Touch and go whether I was hospitalised which, not surprisingly, all concerned felt would probably kill me off with infections!

I'm fortunate with friends and family - they ban me from their homes at the slightest sign of an illness ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mandy, please listen to the advice you have been given. You are on ESA. You are in WRAG. You DO NOT have to apply for any jobs nor attend job interviews nor any such nonsense. That is an absolute fact. Do not make yourself more ill because one person in the Jobcentre has no grasp whatsoever of her job. Why not telephone your DWP distribution centre for further advice? (I'm fortunate in coming under the one at Chippenham and, throughout the three plus years I have been on ESA, they are always extremely helpful). Oh, and throughout those 170 weeks I have NEVER been asked to look for work, apply for jobs. Nor would I expect to be ...

 

I have just read on another forum that the Work Programme is compulsory if your Advisor and JC feels it to be in your best interest, they still cannot make you work or seek work and they also have to take your health condition into consideration in choosing the activities you are able to perform. If you refuse to attend this your payments will be sanctioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read on another forum that the Work Programme is compulsory if your Advisor and JC feels it to be in your best interest, they still cannot make you work or seek work and they also have to take your health condition into consideration in choosing the activities you are able to perform. If you refuse to attend this your payments will be sanctioned.

 

Also on the DWPs website it states its mandatory if its expected the person to be fit for work within 3-6 months which given the frequency of assessments in that WRAG I expect is the majority of people in that group?

 

http://www.latentexistence.me.uk/dwp-edits-documents-to-pretend-work-placements-werent-compulsory/

 

There was also a newspaper report stating that the work programme they using for tesco was planned for people on ESA as well. I assume those in the WRA group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

 

Sadly I think that is due to change because of the Welfare Reform Bill

 

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/disability/welfare-reform-bill-2011-and-disabled/

 

The Welfare Reform Bill 2011 will make it clear that work-related activity can include work experience or a work placement, depending on the individual’s circumstances. We expect these powers to be introduced by April 2012.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly I think that is due to change because of the Welfare Reform Bill

 

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/disability/welfare-reform-bill-2011-and-disabled/

 

Hmm, yes, had heard that now you mention it. Well, here's another can of worms - just what ESA needed....

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me about it :x

 

Just been put into WRAG, normally I would have glad, but now know I risk being sent on training courses,

or work experience, even though been found unfit for work.

 

I was going to appeal as I believe have grounds to be put into the support group.

But I was told my review is in 18 months, and if I appeal and win, I could be reassessed sooner.

So it's a gamble I not going to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... can you not qualify under the rules regarding that if you are found fit for work, this will cause you serious health problems? ...

 

Still don't know anything about this. Anyone have further details / linky thing? ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

because of the claimant's illness, there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person were they found not to have limited capability for work. This exceptional circumstance is the same one as applies in the PCA, and arguably the case law that applies to it should apply here.

 

http://www.cpag.org.uk/cro/wrb/wrb204/wca.htm#except

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rae, you'd be looking at ESA Reg 35:

 

35.—(1) A claimant is to be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity if—

 

(a)the claimant is terminally ill;

 

(b)the claimant is—

(i)receiving treatment by way of intravenous, intraperitoneal or intrathecal chemotherapy; or

(ii)recovering from that treatment and the Secretary of State is satisfied that the claimant should be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity; or

©in the case of a woman, she is pregnant and there is a serious risk of damage to her health or to the health of her unborn child if she does not refrain from work-related activity.

 

(2) A claimant who does not have limited capability for work-related activity as determined in accordance with regulation 34(1) is to be treated as having limited capability for work-related activity if—

(a)the claimant suffers from some specific disease or bodily or mental disablement; and

(b)by reasons of such disease or disablement, there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person if the claimant were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity.

 

Edit: Ninja'd by Nystagmite ;-)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Antone, duly noted! I wish I'd more fully understood that at my last Tribunal. The panel were desperately trying to make me fit the descriptors and were visibly upset that they couldn't do so ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't want to make another thread so thought this one was close to my enquiry.

 

OH been on ESA contribution based since going onto half pay at work (from where he was subsequently 'let go'), was turned down, he appealed and won easily. Another medical 5 months after, turned down and awaiting appeal.

 

With new law, is it worth him pursuing this appeal as his 12 months will be up on contribution based ESA? As he has a pension from work which is by no means healthy but JUST enough to stop him qualifying for income based ESA when my small income is taken into account. He couldn't even get through a pathways to work interview (or whatever they're called now) without breaking down when his old job and how he was treated was brought up. He is also physically disabled but has never claimed DLA or anything as we managed.

 

Just wondering whether it's worth the bother of going through the appeal (which he could mentally do without) if it means he gets nothing anyway? Heavens knows what he would do if trying for JSA but suppose he would have to if he wanted any form of income.

 

Any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I hope you get to see this reply Mandyjay as I have had exactly the same symptoms as you for the last 7 years. I have found out that I do not have fybromyalgia, despite all DR'S insisting I have. I have a viral bacterial illness which attacks joints, muscles and bones alike. I found out by accident when taking antibiotics for a different problem. After 36 hrs on antibiotics my symptoms disappeared as quickly as they hhad appeared 7 years earlier. I urge you to try antibiotics as it will change your life! Unfortunately as the medical profession hate to be proved wrong (in my experience), they refused to let me have more than 3 weeks of antibiotics, so I am in the process of proving my diagnosis by seeing a consultant. Please do not ignore this reply as many dr's who are stumped by symptoms, take the easy option of diagnosing fybromyalgia, even though only 50% of the profession acknowledge its existence. Good luck :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

hi

new to this group and looking for help please.. just failed my medical yet again to which i will apeal against yet again but this time there telling me to claim jobseekers allowance so my benifits dont get affected.. will this jobseekers allowance claim affect my esa apeal, last thing i need is starting all over again with an esa claim..

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I'm saying this twice a day at the moment, but let's just be clear: ESA claimants are not required to participate in the Work Programme. Those in the WRAG will be required to attend six interviews - they cannot be forced into work or training.

 

Is that 6 interviews in one year? Whilst on Wrag ( up until my recently failed repeat medical) I had to attend every 4 weeks ..meaning some months I had to go twice lol at the beginning and end of the month. Food for thought there

 

apologies, only now noted the date of that post, no doubt there have been changes by now lol

Edited by Katelyn25
added comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...