Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest Statutory Demand help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, apologies if this is covered somewhere else in the forum, I have been reading as much as I can but im getting bogged down in the right order to do things.

My husband has received a statutory demand for a £1436 debt to an aqua credit card. I have just spoken to him and asked him when was the last time he either made a payment or acknowledged the debt and he says about 2005 maybe a touch earlier, which makes it 6 years old. So should I send them firstly the statute barred letter or the request for the original agreement forms. Im not sure what the right course of action is, we are going to go to the local court and do the "set aside because its barred" thing but not sure which way to proceed with contacting Capquest.

 

Please could someone with better knowledge than me help me out.

many thanks for your time and im sure your sick of repeating yourself :)

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Any chance you can post up whats been sent.

Whats the background as regards previous communications prior to this ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea like where is the ccj fhey need first?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they need a CCJ to issue a Statutory Demand do they?

 

First thing to remember above all else is that you have 18 days to Act, keep that in mind above all else.

 

If you/your husband are absolutely sure that no payments/acknowledgements have been made for a clear period of 6 years then yes, Statute Barred.

 

There are 2 major lines of thought here, get the SB set aside on the grounds of it being SB - have you checked your credit files?

 

or, simply ignore, before finding CAG I did just that to a Crappy SD and never heard any further from them in over 2 years.

 

Come back with the requested info and there will be loads of advice to help you through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, many thanks for your time, My husband said he has not been in contact with capquest or aqua credit card since about 2005 maybe a touch earlier.

I do think he has had letters threatening baliffs and offering reduced payments etc, but he has ignored them all (not the best course of action I know)

 

I have scanned the letter but I cant get it to upload on here, it keeps saying failed.

 

The letter says Statutory Demand under section 268(1)(a) of the insolvency act 1986.

Debt for liquidation sum payable immediatley and it says "form 6.1" at the top dont know if thats any help.

 

It then has a warning saying its an important document and we have 18 days to set aside or 21 days to deal with this demand.

 

It has an electronic signature of Barry Davies on it and has Capquests address as the creditor.

 

The next page says the debt related to an unpaid balance on an aqua credit card, the agreement terminated upon the failure of my husband to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or a statutory notice of default served by aqua credit card.

 

The rights and duties of aqua credit card passed to the creditor pursuant to an assignment dated 26 jul10. The total amount due at the date of this demand is £1435.72 which includes interest of £81.24 which has accrued since the assignment of the debt.

 

It then has PART A.

which says about the appropriate court for setting aside the demand.

Rule 6.4 (2) of the insolvance rules 1985 states that the appropriate court if the court to which you would have to present your own bankruptcy petition in accordnance with rule 6.40 (1) and 6.40 (2). In accordance with those rules on present information the appropriate court is NOW THIS BIT IS BLANK AND IT DOESNT MENTION A COURT NAME.

any application by you to set aside this demand should be made to that court.

 

Then PART B

details about Barry Davies and capquests address and phone number

 

Then PART C

Original creditor AQUA CREDIT CARD

Assignees Capquest Limited

date of assignment 26 Jul 10

 

Then the last page says how to complet with a statutory demand or have it set aside (act within 18 days)

 

Is this enough info, sorry I couldnt get the scanned copy to work.

 

thanks again

Paula

 

 

thanks again for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

on yea i got my alphabet wrong..its an CO they cant get before a CCJ

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual stuff then.

 

Still not sure which route the more knowledgable caggers' would recomend, my own inclination would be to get off - today - a Statute Barred letter and see if they have any information which they will use to prove otherwise, you could give them 7 days, others may dissagree and have other info to offer, so hang fire for a while though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have had two sd's from this filth, both were for sb debts, i did what harrassed senior did and ignored them.how was it served? and take a good look and see where is says particulars of debt,the rights ans duites of xxx passed to creditors pursuant to an assignment dated mine they conveniently left the date off, this is the give away if they have not put a date in, you have to becareful not to open a can of worms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An assignment is the legal process of selling the account so the new owner would have rights to all title.

Capquest have shown continually as can be seen in these forums,their blatant disregards to consumer regs and codes of practice.

Its time that the OFT did something about these.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As evidence of CapQuest’s commitment to best practices, we have achieved several industry-recognised quality standards. CapQuest’s quality standard benchmarks include:

  • Consumer Credit Licence
  • Member of the Credit Services Association
  • Charter Member of the CSA’s Debt Buyers and Sellers Group
  • Financial Services Authority authorisations to administer regulated mortgages and assist in the administration of insurance.
  • Quality Certificate (ISO9001: 2000
  • Registered Data Controller under the Data Protection Act 1998
  • Registered Data User with the Data Protection Office
  • Member of CAIS (Experian), Insight (Equifax) and Share (Call Credit)
  • Federation Against Software Theft (‘FAST’)—Gold Level.

CapQuest applies practices and procedures consistent with the ISO17799 quality standard for the management of data and IT security.

 

 

Its also about time they were taken to task for failing to uphold CSA and DBSG codes of practice

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin sums up this filth Paula, i was 100% certain that my 2 debts were sb and as such decided that i was going to ignore the sd's, i know that some will say that it is no a good idea to do so but i did not want to get into any dialogue with them and as i had ignored them and such like for 8 years i felt that was the best way to carry on as i did not want them to some way try to get the clock running again knowing how this lot are.

10. Does a statutory demand expire?

There is no expiry period for a statutory

demand. However, under the Limitation Act

1980, a debt must not be more than 6 years

old or based on a default judgment more

than 6 years old. This period can start to run

again from any date the debtor agrees the

debt exists and may be extended more than

once

 

They never employ a process server for service which shows they are just trying to flush you out, they would have to prove service if they moved to present a bankruptcy pettion.

have a read through these.

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/guidanceleafletspdf/statdemand.pdf

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all the help so far, but we have some more info.

 

I told my husband to get his credit file from experien so we could be sure of the dates and he has completely mixed up this one with another debt (another story) The date on the file that it says it defaulted was 24 April 2009 so this is not an old debt as we thought.

 

Are we basically screwed, should he try and offer to pay it in installments or is there anything we can do at this stage, can we send them the letter asking for proof they own the debt, im just not sure what to do now.

 

Im so sorry for messing you around, we should have got the credit file first.

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, back to the beginning, do you recognise this debt, how old is it (when was it taken out): what is a rounded up approx, figure of the amount outstanding. Much of what has been said above is still valid.

 

What is the date you have to comply by, ie, 18 days from 'alleged' receipt. Being lazy and not reading back, how was this delivered? As long as it was 'normal' unsigned for royal mail, then of course there is no proof you even received it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK this has been playing on my mind and its now 1.19am and I cant flipping sleep worrying about it.

The dates ive given a few posts above from the Experian report say the debt is Capquest, it doesnt mention Aqua Credit Card who the original debt was with, so when it says the "date started" is this when the debt started with Aqua or with Capquest as this could be why hubby got messed up with the dates. We dont think its statute barred but just dont know how to proceed with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok lets cross 'i's and dot 't's here for you...........

 

the dca will show as the named creditor now as they have obv broughtthe debt.

 

now , in a way, forget the defaulted date

that means nowt.

 

when was you hubby's last financial transaction In/OUT?

 

that will be from when the SB will start ticking.

 

if you dont know

 

then its time for an sar to the OC not capquest.

 

if you honestly DON'T know what the hell this debt is or have doubts

then CCA capquest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll give you a 2nd little tip

 

barry davies DOES NOT EXIST

 

so hence the SD is NULL AND VOID

 

what i would suggest you do is use our advanced search top right

 

type in barry davies

and do some reading!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...firstly try and relax as best as you can. It would of course be good to know when you last made a payment towards this alleged debt. But I would advise firstly to apply to set this aside. The fact they have not put your nearest court name on the documents would consititue an abuse of process. Take a look here and you will find out about the process, what to do and other successful cases. But if you aren't sure then please do ask... - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?287987-help-with-a-statutory-demand&p=3237562#post3237562 you will also find lots of other threads in here too - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...