Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Financial


ShaneG2009
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Just wondering if you can help me out. I have 'Marcus' from Link Financial literally hounding me and my family regarding an old Abbey National Account and i wondering what i should do.

 

The story goes...

 

1) I had an abbey account through my teenage years up until about 2006 where through my own fault i got £500 overdrawn and foolishly i buried my head in the sand and sort of forgot about it

 

2)fast forward to the later months of 2010 i get a letter from Santander which is odd. It is a new card with PIN to follow showing quite clearly that my account is £500 plus in credit. I thought it was incorrect but didnt pursue it - i binned the card.

 

3) very shortly after the letter above i started getting calls from Marcus / Link Financial who as usual were very threatening and upfront. I advised Marcus i wanted to sort this with Santander so i wrote to them via there complaints procedure to ask them to review my account due to the conflicting information i had received from them and now being chased by the DC for immediate payment.

 

4) Santander acknowledged my complaint and advised at the beginning of the year their findings. They basically told me i had received the 'in credit' letter by mistake and i in fact was overdrawn by such an amount.

 

5) over the last 4 or so weeks i have been getting daily calls from Link / marcus on my parents home phone, my mobile and EVEN my work office number (god knows how they got that number!!!). Anyway i wrote to Link asking them to send me details that properly acknowledged their ability to collect the debt on behalf of Santander to which they as usual havent acknowledged or bothered to respond to. They continue despite me saying both over the phone and in written correspondence that they are only to contact me in writing regarding this debt. When ringing my parents they get the same response 'i am at work / who are you' to which Marcus has begun to tell my mum he is a 'friend' from London and to ring him back.

 

Last week this all came to a head in a telephone conversation with Marcus. He again took the line they want the debt sorting now. I said you havent replied to my letters yet. They dont even bother talking about them. I then said i wont discuss resolving this sum until you show me you are legally entitled to collect etc to which they again just shrug off. I then said you are only to contact me in writing to which he simply replied ' we are a telephone business, we wont write to you we will continue to ring you until the problem is solved'

 

I know you guys have probably heard this all before but i would really appreciate your guidance on how to deal with them. Do i report them now only for them to keep harassing me and my parents etc?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

report the muppet to the information commissioners office

 

calling you at work is unlawful and again the strict guidelines

 

lastly.........

 

 

STOP TALKING TO THE MUPPET ON THE PHONE

 

you are causing yourself trouble by continually doing it.

 

now this debt........all charges or what?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All

 

I'll write to him on the harassment letter and that will do from now.

 

With regards talking to him its hard especially at the home phone (my parents phone). He calls during my normal working hours and my mum is always going to answer the phone so we are stuck in a bit of a rut!

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi

 

Can anybody help me with Link Financial? 5 or so years ago i got into diffculty with an Abbey National overdraft which i didnt pay back. They closed my account and then assigned / sold the debt to Link Financial.

 

I have now paid the disputed amount to Link Financial and have asked them to clear the Default from my credit file for the reason that i dont believe they served the correct notices when they took over the debt. They've told me on the phone today that they can get a copy of the Default apparently served by Abbey National but i am wondering if this is sufficient? Should Link not give me a period of time to repay the debt prior to Defaulting it in their name?

 

If the Default served by Abbey is provided is this sufficient for the relevant legislation? What information do they need to provide in order to properly satisfy their obligations when defaulting an account?

 

I've read several posts on here that intimate LF make widespread mistakes in their service of notices etc. so i am wondering if i can persuade them to remove the default on the basis they didnt serve the notices correctly etc. If that's not possible do you think the cap in hand approach would work?

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick information update

 

Account with Abbey started 13/08/2001

Defaulted on 14/09/2006 (SB'd Sept 2012 i guess - irrelevant now i've settled i know)

 

One thing to note after reading more of the forums is i dont ever remember Abbey putting a default notice on my credit file. Are link entitled to do this when they are sold / assigned the debt?

 

Thanks

 

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry your posts were missed.

 

Link Financial wouldn't have placed the original default, Abbey would have as they were the creditor before the debt was sold. Once LF got the debt, they would have replaced Abbeys name with their own although the date would stay the same.

 

Proving that a default wasn't issued or was faulty won't do a lot. What would have been better was to negotiate the removal as part of the settlement process.

 

As it is, LF should now mark your file as settled (or partially settled if you did an F&F)

 

Your default will disappear from your file in September/October next year anyway

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...