Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax / walking possession order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4875 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A bailiff turned up I ignore the door bell unless i'm expecting someone. (I'm disabled and people call me first before calling round or they have a key). I had no idea who it was anyway.

 

Then a letter was pushed through the door which turn out to be a walking possession order. The bailiff went and looked over the back garden fence and list anything he could see.

 

Sure this cant be legal?

 

Can a balif list thing in your garden fornt or back (I have an 8ft sold fence around the back coz of the dog / the front is open drive way) without gaining entry to the property first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHow much is the order for? and do you receive benefits, like Incapacity, or ESA and DLA, ?, and as you are disabled you are likely vulnerable under the guidelines for enforcement. If you are on inciome based bensfits you should be in receipt of some Council Tax benefit/ Housing benefit if you rent

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They probably could list them, but there would have to be sufficient value in the goods to pay his fees, the removal, auction fees and a proportion of the debt. They like to levy on cars if they can also. if you check the stickys there is a fair bit on there

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if its screwed to to the wall their not allowed to remove it as its a fixture or fitting,a walk in posession order is just that a householder either leaves a window open they can climb in or fall for some dubious story and let them walk in and sign such a document.hence keep them outside and they have to return the warrant unsatisfied.and never sign anything or let them in.

 

most people dont have anything of real value in their gardens anyway.so its doubtful if it will include the stone bird bath and table/feeder exe.

 

the problem with council tax if the debt goes above £750 they may attempt to bankrupt you,are you sure your not entitled to any council tax benefit relief and claiming all that you should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get IS, IB, DLA and my car is taxed as disabled so they cant touch that and its parked on my driveway which is mt front garden. So to touch it they would have to trespass.

 

This is for an old property (over 10 years ago). I think its for about £200 or £300 is owed.

 

The goods lists are garden orniments not woth anything. I've not signed anything either.... the document says they canenter my house to sezie the goods

 

I get full council tax now maybe thats how they found me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get IS, IB, DLA and my car is taxed as disabled so they cant touch that and its parked on my driveway which is mt front garden. So to touch it they would have to trespass.

 

This is for an old property (over 10 years ago). I think its for about £200 or £300 is owed.

 

The goods lists are garden orniments not woth anything. I've not signed anything either.... the document says they canenter my house to sezie the goods

 

I get full council tax now maybe thats how they found me?

 

You are most likely classed as vulnerable, and being in receipt of benefits, bailiff action may well be inappropriate. contact the council and tell them this as deduction from benefit is the preferred option, adding bailiff fees to someone on benefits is an obnoxious proceedure. I would check with the council when and for what address the Liability Order was obtained.

 

Others will likely be along who know more.

Edited by brassnecked
grammar

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to contact the council as above.they cannot just break in its not a court fine or should they "just stuff" a walk in possession order through the door letterbox they must have had prior access to do so and then would to avoid any later redress would seek a signature, and such a move would be nothing more then intimidatory,given a disabled person and in this situation is unacceptable behavior.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to remind the Council of your status, if you are in receipt of CTB then they already know your circumstances and should never have put this out to the Bailiff in the first place. Send an email off tonight to CEO of the Council and copy in Head of Revenues, for good measure make sure your local Councillor and Leader of the Council are notified also.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

morsy I agree with ploddertom, get onto the council by email as suggested ASAP if you don't know who your councillor is, try here http://www.writetothem.com/ where you can find your councillor and MP contact details.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise .... I belive they have also applied £30 fee for the visit

 

My concern is if they come back and try to gain entry and call the police and they let them in think they have a vaild walking possesion order, or is this an intimidation taktic?

 

Most peopple will have things out in the garden i.e. table chairs, bird feeder, orniments etc peering over the fence or threw a crack and listing what you can see surly must be ilegal? Suprised they did not list the dog, but hey hes a rescue so he not my sole property plus he'd eat them!

 

I know they can climb over the fence into your garden to enter the building if a window is open. Mine all have locks on them so I can lock them shut or open slighly for ventilation so they cant get in.

 

I'll see what the council have to say on this one tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advise .... I belive they have also applied £30 fee for the visit

 

My concern is if they come back and try to gain entry and call the police and they let them in think they have a vaild walking possesion order, or is this an intimidation taktic?

 

They have so far not gained peaceful entry to your home so any threat of forced entry is just that - they cannot do it. They want you to sign the WPA in order that they can charge an extra fee - £12-00.

 

Most peopple will have things out in the garden i.e. table chairs, bird feeder, orniments etc peering over the fence or threw a crack and listing what you can see surly must be ilegal? Suprised they did not list the dog, but hey hes a rescue so he not my sole property plus he'd eat them! This may be something of a grey area and I would argue his levy is invalid as he he has not gained access to seize them, he is allowed to climb your fence providing he causes no damage and if there are clear signs there is a dog on the premises then that is his look out - after all how are you supposed to know he was coming!

 

I know they can climb over the fence into your garden to enter the building if a window is open. Mine all have locks on them so I can lock them shut or open slighly for ventilation so they cant get in.

 

I'll see what the council have to say on this one tomorrow

The Council will be argumentative and refuse to take it back, this is what those at the bottom are told to do, you need to be further up the food chain and don't take no for an answer.

 

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure you email the CEO and councillor, as well If they have an outsoursced front desk, you could be in a Capita/Equita type scenario so will have to push this upstairs. Whixh council ios it?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to seizure of goods the normal rule is the bailiff has to be able to touch it. So looking over the fence would be deemed satisfactory,however this levy does not give him the right of entry as you have been advised he has not made peaceful entry so he cannot force entry and the police would only attend to prevent a breach of the peace. Goods screwed down can be removed it is common practice to remove wall mounted televisions. Goods deemed to be fittings are kitchen cabinets, doors, fireplaces,windows etc ....

 

It is highly unlikely that he council will bankrupt you as there has been a change in policy since the new goverment came in and obviously it would cost the council and they probably have bigger fish to bankrupt.If you vehicle is motability or on finance they cannot seize it.

 

The other point to note is that the guidelines state that just because somebody may be classed as vunerable it doesnt mean they are suffering hardship but clamping a vehicle belonging to a disabled person should be avoided.

 

What you should consider doing is contacting the council direct and ask them to do an attatchment to your ESA it will be deducted at source at a low amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK contacted the council they referd me to the Bailifs but I asked to speak to a supervisor or Manger as the Bailifs can't answer these questions and they refered me to the council. I've not phoned the bailifs but yet I got the answers I think I need.

 

Ok its for the last property I lived in, which I paid in full in feb 1999. The period they charged was for end July 98 when I moved in to March 99 however I had a 6 months tenancy and was given notice to terminate (Nov 98 ) at the end of the 6 months as the owner wanted to sell, I move out begining of Jan 99 and the property remained empty till sold. The council obtained a liability order for the whole period 7/98 to 3/99 and sent all the paper work to the old address. The payment I made in Feb was via telephone banking BACS payment in Feb 99 the council recived this but said it was return 4 days later they have no idea they say its a Direct Debit paymrnt (I never use DD). I contacted my bank they dont hold record back that far and say a BACS payment once left can not be recalled. so were did this money go?

 

The fact that the amount they say I owe was for a longer period then I lived there, the council say if I can prove when I moved out they will adjust the amont owed. Howerver as they recived my payment I've over paid them any way. Is the liability order vaild as it for the wrong amont owed / period?

 

I can see this one getting interesting!

 

On the note of the Bailifs thing I expained about the WPO and the alleged levy on goods in the garden, the council say its vaild and the Bailifs can come back and take them. I pointed out the value of the goods listed at new was only £60 and now the wooden table n chairs are rotten and worth nothing they not likly to get £30 for all the item listed which is what they have charged me. Plus hte fact I have not signed anything and they have not entered the property.

 

She said she would check with colluages and the Bailifs firm, she just phone back saying it is vaild I asked by what satute / athority? The reply from the council manger - the Bailifs - made me chuckle any way. I said I dont quite think it works like that and I dispute the vailidity of the WPO. She said shes made notes

 

BTW I have truecall so it all recorded.

 

I willl dig out the evideance of the move and sent it to them. After that correction the council claims £98.99 plus £21.00 costs (119.99) that I owe ... put I've over paid them by £138.01 (feb 99 payment made, return by council, that I never recived that back).

 

They have also taken an overpayment from my current property £16.23 to pay of the money owed. Leaving 103.76 to pay

 

They want £5 a month form Jan 2011 to clear the £103.76 they say is owe based on my benifits (IS / IB)

 

If I agree to the payments they will take the account back from the Bailifs, what then happpens to the bailifs charges?

 

What should I do?

Edited by morsy
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have overcharged you for the previous addrfess and then gained a liability order , they may be on a sticky wicket, glad you have recorded the call as it may well be useful later, bailiffs seem to make it up as they go along with collusion from the council.

 

Others will be able to advise further

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion you are on the right track but will need to dig up as much evidence as you can when you moved. This may be from the next property you moved into. I assume when you did move you notified the Council. As for the payment that has gone missing it will not be the first time this has been allocated to another department within a Council, they should investigate this.

 

The Council are obviously talking out of their derrieres re the levy. If it was not for the fact it was so serious I would ring them up and tell them you are aggrieved by the Bailiffs levy and will be making a Regulation 46 Complaint at the Magistrates Court naming the Council as Defendant. This should make them sit up and take note.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind they have offered to take the account back i would accept this and start paying the fiver it will stop the bailiffs attending, just ask the council if they will be quashing the bailiff fees and ask for it in writing. At least this will buy you some time whilst you olan your next step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help / advice.

 

I've agreed to pay £5 a month so they have taken the account back.

I have asked the council to investigate where my payment has gone to, they say they returned the money back to the account it came from, but I would notice an exta £230+ in my account. Lets see what their investigation show up.

 

Anything I can do about the liability order as its for the wrong amount, its for more than I owe and for a period longer than I was resident there.

 

I have faxed the council the letter giving me notice to quit the tenancy which I recieved from the agency. Plus details from my new property that I moved in to. The council have accepted this and are amending the account.

 

The agency I rented from should have informed then and I also sent letters out at the time (untilites phone etc) asi didn't trust the agenct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were not liable for the time they claim they must also abolish any & all charges associated with this ie the costs of the Liability Order.

 

PT

 

So does that mean if they charge me for 10 momths and I lived there for 6 months in the same tax year and owe some of the 6 months council tax they must abolish any & all charges associated with this ie the costs of the Liability Order?

 

Because they are insisting I pay their costs for the Liability Order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry may not have made myself clear. If they had a LO solely for the time you had moved out then there would be no charges they could apply. However if that time covered partly the time you lived there then yes you would be liable to pay it.

 

Example

Council obtained LO for Jan - March & you had moved in Dec then no charge payable.

Council obtained LO for Jan - March & you moved in Feb then yes you would pay the cost of obtaining the LO but outstanding CT would only be for the time you were resident.

 

Hope that sorts it.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...