Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
    • I cannot locate anything in my paper work that states 2 payments were made? Perhaps you could point this out? In reply from IAS it states "The ticketing data has been attached" nothing was sent to me. I made a response to the IAS all this was done online
    • Thanks again for your responses. The concern I have here, is that freeholder of the land (a company, who presumably would have been the ones to have initially instructed PPM to manage the parking here), will have proof of exactly how long the vehicle was on site for, as the driver was meeting operatives from that company on a separate matter. On this basis, if the matter was to get to court, I feel all the other technicalities about signage, size of signage/font, lack of start/finish times, will not be enough to have any case dropped? This PCN was brought up to the freeholder but they have advised that PPM will not waive this charge. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Leaving a new job and contracts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4897 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two weeks ago, I started a new job. I have been very unhappy and the work conditions were not what I was led to believe. In fact, it so turned out that people join this office only to leave quite soon for so intolerable are the matters.

I would like to submit my resignation as soon as possible. Is this possible? Should I personally submit it or can it be done by postal mail? I'd appreciate your thoughts.

But please note the following:

- I haven’t yet signed the contract (dated the day on which I joined)

- The contract mentions that those in probationary period should give a notice of 1 month, but I want to leave immediately

- I had ordered supplies for my office, some of which were delivered and some won’t be.

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot resign with immediate effect - not signing your contract is irrelevant, and you are, like the employer, bound by its terms. If you do so then there are risks involved. Whilst those risks are not commonplace - they happen often enough to be well worth noting. If you then take the risk - on your own head be it.

 

Those pesky contractual rights that employees like to talk about work both ways. If you resign then in law your employer can sue you for breach of contract. That must be for a loss that they can quantify, which isn't always easy to do - but it is also far from impossible. You could, therefore, end up being sued, and owing more to the employer than you ever earned plus their legal costs. This does not happen often - but it does happen and you have been told it does, so don't complain to me if it does! The problem with this one is that everybody assumes that they won't be the unlucky one, or the employer can't prove a loss, etc., etc., - if everybody was right there wouldn't be any such cases, and there are. So do remember that in the words of the Lottery "It might be you"!

 

Not getting paid any wages, accrued holiday and or expenses is more likely. Yes, this is also a breach of contract and you can sue them - but it is actually far more likley that the employer will then counter-sue for the above! This scennario is actually far more common and could possibly still end up with you owing them money! It's one of those "people in glass houses" situation - so whilst I would not tell you not to take legal action to recover anything owed to you, I would not neceaasrily recommend doing so for this reason.

 

My personal favourite - I have only come across this one once in reality - but the client also "thought it would never happen to him"... The employer finds out where you have moved to, and writes to the employer, threatening them with legal action for inducing you to breach of contract (this assumes that you are going to work somewhere else - but you'd be kind of daft to give up a job without one to go to, so I am assuming that is the case) - the new employer sacks you as a result and the old employer still sues you! So you end up unemployed, owing money, and with a CCJ.

 

I should also add that I don't understand the third point really - but if you have ordered supplies and these belong to your employer, if you keep any supplies you could be charged with theft - if you have ordered supplies which you have paid for and the company should reimburse, I would suggest you can go whistle for the money because I doubt you will ever see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've been provided with a written statement of the terms and conditions of employment, and haven't challenged with your employer as to the terms contained within it, then you are bound by the terms there in. Whether or not you've signed it is of no significance.

What exactly is making you so unhappy in the job, and what is so different about the work conditions from what you were led to believe?

What I'd suggest, if you're so deeply dissatified with your new appointment, is that you explain this to your employer and see if you can come to some agreement to terminate the relationship without serving the months notice. If they refuse, I think you're tied to serving the notice period.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SarEl for your thoughts and guidance.

 

The supplies which I ordered can be utilised by any successor.

 

I just want to leave this job (even though I have no waiting job offers since this new job was meant as a long-term step) and I do not plan on asking them for the wages. I also glean that it would be most wise to deal with this amicably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you also, Elpulpo- very much appreciate it.

 

After hassling them much, I had been shown the contract (with utmost reluctance) some months ago and had pointed out various points in the t&c in which I needed amendment. They promised to 'look into it', but never made any changes.

 

To answer your questions, there are just so many factors which is making this job intolerable and I desist from listing most. One example is that I was told that I would be provided with various mandatory tools and resources for this new job- and now they are refusing to provide any despite my persistent requests. I tend to survive in the toughest environment; this has exceeded the threshold point- and I am not the only one, considering that there has been a massive exodus in the past for the same reasons which I am now facing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Careful as all this stress may cause you to go off sick for an indefinite time. If this happens, hand in your notice immediately. If not, hand it in immediatley anyway.

 

Indeed! I cannot deal with all this excess stress- I also have a very high bp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth going to your GP and being signed off due to your BP, it's not worth risking your health over a job you have no care for and do not intend to pursue. Then approach your employer and say, 'look, I'm not coming back, so why don't we just draw a line under everything?'.

I'd ask for the wages, if I was you. You've done the work, and put up with a lot of crap in the process, by the sound of it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are determined, then I can't disagree with any of the other posters - but I definitely agree with you that amicably is the way to go if at all possible. The problem with telling people that something is a low risk is that you never know who is at low risk until the employer does it! Having met someone who has lost thousands of £'s in this "low risk process", I am always wary of simply telling people it is a low risk and err on the side of making it very clear. Perhaps a bit overly cautious - but better that than someone taking your advice and ending up on the other side of it!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. I doubt many employers would be averse to coming to an agreement that an employee, particularly one with only a few weeks service, leave sooner than was contracted if they're evidently deeply unhappy with their new role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks once again, Elpulpo and SarEl.

There is one additional matter which still bothers me: As mentioned (and with some additional clarifications), the office had pestered me to provide them with a list of supplies to be bought before I joined work. Consequently, some turned up (the remainder won't since the office has no plans of ordering these). All of these can be used by my successor. But would this provide a ground for dissent by my employer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...