Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Trouble with a Payday lender


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I'm a total newbie and have tried searching for an answer to my question before posting so apologies if the answer is already out there, but I couldn't find it.

 

I'm really after some advice in regards a payday company trading under the umbrella of WageDayAdvance,

 

Before I go any further I wish I had never been so silly as to get involved in this whole world of payday loans but I did and I did quite severly, I at my lowest point had 7 different payday loans.

 

Over the course of a year, I only ever missed the payment to one of these companies and so always remained up to date with settling or 'rolling over my accounts' by repaying the agreed sum.

 

However I realised things were spiralling out of control and so with the financial support of my mother I contacted all the companies and obtained bank details and reference numbers, which my mum then used to settle the loans for me, I now will be repaying her, at a much lower rate!!

 

Six of these companies gave me no problems and have also responded to my request to place a restriction against my details preventing me from taking any future loans out with them - I simply said I would reagrd any future contract null and void and would have no intention of repaying any money.

 

The seventh company, WDA however have been a different story entirely. The payment was made from my mothers account on 12th december and was the middle transaction of the 7. The funds have clearly left her account and WDA have confirmed since that the account and sort code numbers used were the correct ones. the total amount paid was £493 plus a few pence.

 

After three days I contacted (Edit) from their collection team and asked for an update, he informed me that they had not yet recieved the funds. After daily phone conversations chasing updates, (Edit) informed me that he would still be processing the payment from my account on the previously agreed date of 24th december.

 

I emailed him back and stated very clearly that I did not authorise this payment to be decducted and would consider any attempt to proceed as a fraudulant attempt to obtain funds.

 

Needless to say on 24th, the money was taken from my account and in the many conersations since they are still insisting that they have only recieved that payment.

 

My mothers bank is now in the middle of an investigation and I have no doubts that this will result in either me or her recieving the near £500 back.

 

However given the clear conversation, once I have had confirmation from WDA that they do indeed have both payments, will I stand a good chance of prosecution if I take them to court? I feel very aggrieved that in trying to help me out, my mother has been through untold stress over the festive period as between us we have paid of this loan twice, If possible I would like to raise a claim against WDA for £50 per day that they have had both payments, so effectively from the 24th december.

 

Any advice/ feedback or tips would be greatly appreciated.

 

many thanks and happy new year to you all

 

Exeter

Edited by maroondevo52
Removed name.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, exeter2005.

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Exeter

 

I suspect getting your money back is the main priority. I would take them to court to retrieve this if needbe. As for compensation I think you would be gambling. I would personally cancel all cards they have access to just in case they try and gel themselves to some charges of their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, yeah thanks for the reply I will have no hesitation in taking further action if they hold onto the double payment for much longer. I just think its disgusting that they can be so blatant in their procedures as to do this and would like to take them to task over it....

 

but your probably right! :)

 

cheers

exeter

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Exeter, WDA are normally quite easy. i would try and get the money back from WDA, no threats or requests for compensation because it'll not help and probably wont be awarded. if that doesnt work call your bank and show them proof of payment from your mum's account and insist that the bank reverse the transaction and send you your money back they may say no but try harder...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...