Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive locked the old thread post here now. it's how backdoor CCJ's work sadly as he didn't update his 'creditors' he had moved sadly quite legal and to be honest 9/10 nothing can now be done. paying it will NOT resolve the issue a CCJ shows for 6yrs regardless to paid or not or paying or not. you could poss ask whom is refusing his guarantor status for you that if the CCJ is paid, would the issue be resolved, but that will cost you the sum of the judgement. dx  
    • new thread created for this parking CCJ. please only post here now.  
    • So how can the courts then issue a CCJ?! Confirmed by Registry Trust? and issued by CNBC?! 😡  I'll phone again tomorrow and get all the details.
    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A complex start to 2011, any advice please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is a complex scenario, so I would ask if you would kindly read this in full and help if you have the expertise. I was not sure exactly where to post this. Also note I am acting on behalf of friends with no internet currently.

 

My friend, she went to live back at her fathers 3 bedroom council house in Sussex, and has been for the last 10 months or so. Within this time, her ex-partner had been in contact with her, struggling with disability, been on emergency housing transfer list for some time, level 2T. It had come to the point where he could no longer manage the stairs up to his flat, also struggling to even reach his car. Along with disabilities he has social phobia, so could not deal with all the people in London, as well as agoraphobia, panic attacks and other mental ailments. His ex offered to become his carer, a great friend, and the only person he could trust anywhere near him. The reason for them being ex's is he is Gay, but not openenly, struggling to come to terms with it.

 

He upped sticks, leaving his one bedroom council flat, as he simply could not cope with London, a dodgy neighbour, caring from himself, and the isolation and hermitising caused through living in London. He was fine when he lived in sussex prior to his breakdown which it the reason he left there in the first place. he had little choice, the break down caused him to be homeless if he remained in Sussex, he went to stay at his parents in London before being housed under mental health grounds. I guess technically if anything goes wrong, he would be intentionally homeless.

 

Everything was fine in Sussex, the girl living with her father, his wife and teen child, and the person she is carer for. They are all registered as living there. Now the father, wife and son went on holiday to Thailand, this is the brith place of Wife & child, they married and come to Britain about 8 years ago. They normally go for a month or two. However, they have just been notified that they are all going to stay in Thailand, never to return. Obvisouly the Londoner and his carer (Daughter of Tenenacy holder) would not be entitled to keep the house, one due to amount of bedrooms, two, they are not the tenant. They have tried to find private rented, but a lot are out of the scope financially for housing benefit, others just do not accept DSS, also they have a small yorkshire terrier, medicinal for the Londoner, clean, flealess, well trained. Most do not accept pets at all. Fighting a losing battle on that front. he cant do b&b, due to bad experiences when in b&b in the pasted, also due to social phobia and disability. Where do these two stand in regards to being rehoused in a suitable sized property? Please, any advice would be greatly appreciated as time is running out. They have yet to inform the council of the tenant leaving the UK, due to only just finding out, and obviously want to be equipped with all the information they can be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The trouble is, that once the tenancy is ended, the two are effectively homeless. They would need to present themselves as homeless to the local authority who would no doubt place them in emergency accomodation if available, and it cannot be guaranteed that this wouldn't be a B&B or hostel, until suitable accomodation is available for them, and of course there is the waiting list which varies from one local authority to another. Have you tried Shelter at all? They would be in the best position to advise on such an issue.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

An email has been shot off to shelter, awaiting response. other advise is to stay put, well they have little choice other than to do that. I think the issue regarding homelessness, the mental health has to be taken into consideration, if the person is social phobic, agoraphobic and needs a carer, they could not just put him into unsuitable accomodation. It would be like putting someone on the top floor with no lift, knowing the person cant walk, not saying this person cant walk, but just generalising how things must be taken into consideration. To get them out would end in a court eviction, perhaps there maybe some meeting halfway, freeing up the much needed 3 bedroom faster, but then thats what I think & is just an opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will not be classed as squatters. They would be classed as unauthorised occupants. Rental payments will not be accepted but they will be charged and can pay trespass and damage charges (which should be the same amount as rent).

 

If they have only just made the decision not to return and have not informed the Council they may still be able to assign the tenancy over to the daughter. Check the Council's website for info on their process re. assignements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...