Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins in Westminster - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

any consumer law experts on here??


renton608
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think the problem is that when we went in originally we had just come from dfs where we had seen a nice right angle corner suite we liked but thought we would have a look at this other place.

 

At the time we spoke to the manager and a sales person and told them what we had seen in dfs and did they have anything the same they could show us.

 

the manager then said they had something but didint have the exact suite in the showroom but had the chaise lounge version in the showroom.

 

he showed us this suite and we asked him if they could definitely get this same in a right angle corner and he said "yes,but let me go and check" he then came back with a headed compliments slip with the name of the sofa and all the dimensions and sizes of the bits we needed to order, he told us to take this and go and measure up to make sure it would fit, we did that and returned to the shop within the hour to place the order.

 

everything from the compliments slip was transferred to the order except the sizes, so where it said on the slip...... 1 x corner unit @ 1metre square, the order just said 1 x corner unit.

 

The compliments slip was stapled to our copy of the order form though and its in the same handwriting as the order as the manager wrote them both out.

 

so yes they have delivered a corner unit ,just not the one they said it would be in the frost place and this new one doesn't fit in our front room as its 1.6metres by 1.6 meters and arc shaped so there is a massive gap behind it which defeats the point of having a corner sofa.

 

i explained this to the chap running the shop in the managers absence and he just said , "you ordered a corner unit and you got a corner unit end of"!!!! he also said we wont collect it and you are not getting a refund.

 

how do you think this would stand up in court then??

 

anyway thanks for your help !!

 

steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve

 

Do you still have the compliment slip with the measurements on? If you have that you might stand a chance but you will have to go to small claims court to prove all of this.

The Problem is because they have not clearly stated the measurements on the invoice and just put a corner unit they try every possible way to get away with it because they are taking your trust and you the customer are trusting them.

 

The Attitude you have describe sounds very familiar, First thing you need to do is put it in writing to the Manager at the Shop and explain the situation of the corner unit, that it was not the correct one you ordered in size and give him 7 working days for a reply or even 5, await for the reply and see what happens then,

Then if you get no reply send another letter telling them you are going to take them to small claims court and charge them for storing a corner settee of no used to you and all the cost for all correspondents and time of work and anything else as long as it is reasonably to the small claims court and also the court costs too.

 

I bet you as soon as the court date will appear they will cough up and collect or produced the correct goods, don't forget keep all copies off correspondents and also send them to the credit card company as they can freeze payment and interest on the amount that's bee charge to you, hope all this Help's.

 

By the way, was the Manager White, Blond Hair, not short a bit long and Blue Eyes, smart wearing a shirt and Trousers with a London accents ?

 

All the Best Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kiwee, thanks for the reply.

 

we have already sent them a letter under the sales of goods act ststaing the goods are as described and the are not fit for the purpose made known to therm. i beleive they have 14 days to respond to this.however this letter was just addressed to "the manager" as i didn't know his name at the time.

 

we have also sent our credit card company a letter under section 75 of the consumer credit act holding them jointly liable.

 

would it be worth sending the letter as you describe it above or wait until the 14 days has elapsed.

 

it has spoilt Christmas as we have nowhere to sit and the sofa is taking up most of the front room so we cant put the decorations up for the kids.

 

I have done some more digging on "the sofa specialist " , they dont even exist as a legal company, however a PRIVATE company, same location, same telephone number, and the name of ELS has been set up for the same address as "the sofa specialist"

 

isnt that illegal in itself

 

regards

 

steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi im after a bit of advice and im hoping someone can help.

 

we visited a shop to look at a product . we specifically wanted x product in a right angle shape, shop said they could supply us with a right angle as we wanted but needed to check, so the manager came back with a headed compliments slip with all dimensions of said product.

 

we used these dimesnions to go and make sure the product would fit in the area we wanted it to go.

 

using these sizes we realised the product would fit.

 

so we went back down the shop about an hour later to place order.

 

however none of the sizes were transferred to the order form just the piece we wanted to order.

 

however the headed compliments slip was stapled to our copy of the order so we still have it.

 

fast forwrd to saturday and product turns up with incorrect shaped piece and will not fit in the area.

 

we informed shop and they are saying tough, you ordered this piece , you got it. however its not the bit we were led to believed would be ordered.

 

my question is, if this goes to court can the compliments slip be used to fight our case as the manger of the shop just told me it would be laughed out of court??

 

please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like you've been told on the other threads that you've started, the compliments slip is evidence that will be weighed up by the judge along with all the other evidence. From my unqualified perspective I would say it's quite useful to you because, if they didn't agree to supply a unit that went right into the corner, how come you've got a compliments slip with the company logo that says that's exactly what they will supply.

 

I must admit to being a little confused about why you're taking legal advice from a furniture retailer that you're in dispute with and that has already proven themselves to be less than totally above board. You wouldn't go to a shoe shop for advice about your car so stop listening to this rip-off merchant and start believing the things that you are told on here, starting with this: Stop talking to the store in question and raise a dispute calmly in writing with the head office, concentrating only on the facts, at their registered address (which is probably on the compliments slip and should be on the invoice). Then pick one thread and update that with any questions

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry about the double post im just really frustrated by the whole incident.

 

the sofa is taking up so much room in the front room and we cant put the xmas decs up for the kids and things are geting a little bit stressful between me and the wife.

 

i have had a reply from the so called manger, here is what i put on the other thread..............

i have just had a heated phone conversation with the sales man who was quite rude to us when we went into to complain about the sofa being wrong.

 

he is now saying that he is in overall charge of the company and that the person we had liusted as the md is not.

 

why couldnt he of said that at the time instead of saying he would have to get in touch with the so called md??

 

he is also saying that the headed compliments slip will get laughed out of court and that i have signed a legal binding contract (the order form ) which says we wanted to order 1x corner unit and that is what he has delivered.

 

how do you think this would stand up in court?? i have a headed compliments slip with the dimensions of the sofa we were led to believe the company were going to order for us, its in the same handwriting as the actual order as it was done by the same person(the shop manger)and it was ordered from them in good faith and trust that they could supply what we wanted. they havent.

 

they have then failed to supply us the correct sofa and are now back tracking.

 

also he has literally got off the phone to us now at 19.30 at night?? isnt that a bit strange?

 

he also had his phone on loudspeaker and had 3 other people in his office to listen to the conversation, trying to get me all tied up, surely this is entrapment??

 

i really do appreciate all the help i can get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply.

we sent a letter doing that a week ago and the manger phoned last night to basically try to scare us into not pursuing this any further.

 

he said that as the dimensions are on the compliments slip and not the order they do not have anything to do with the order??

Link to post
Share on other sites

...he said that as the dimensions are on the compliments slip and not the order they do not have anything to do with the order??

 

What's it to do with then? I am astonished by the cheek of it.

 

What's happening here is an attempt to mislead a consumer into the taking of a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise which is a criminal offence under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks very much for the link.

 

i have had a long look at that and it does seem to me that they are breaking one of the parts of it by misleading me about the goods.

 

we paid part of the cost on our credit card and the rest by cash.

 

i have sent a letter to my card company holding them in joint liability under the consumer credit act, so far they have not replied, however the so called chairman of ths sofa company last night told me on the phone that he had sent a copy of the invoice to the card company already???? bit strange that they havent contqced me first thoigh dont you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the reply.

 

we worte to them last we and sent the letter via recorded delivery.

 

this is the reason the so called chairman of the sofa specialiast called us last night .

 

ive contacted consumer direct again today to expain what has happended and they are now passing it onto the local trading standards office. i should here from them in the next 3 working days.

she also said that i will probably need to take them to the small claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to stop posting asking for advice and either follow the advice given, or ignore us and do your own thing. I suspect that if I trawled other consumer advice forums I'd see more of your threads.

 

They are not going to do anything so you need to decide if you are going to pursue this. I would suggest FOS in the first place, or suing. No-one here is going to give you a magical phrase that will sort this out - it is now down to you to act on the advice given or live with it. It is time to **** or get off the pot.

 

Don't rely on anyone else to sort it, and remember that the longer you leave it before instigating some sort of action the less likely it will be that you will win.

 

Ignore perpy - the consumer protection regs won't help you. You can't enforce them or take action on the back of them. Your claim is simple breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing to prevent any person who so sees fit, to lay information before a Magistrate to seek a summons to prosecute a criminal offence, and in any case

 

Duty to enforce

 

19.—(1) It shall be the duty of every enforcement authority to enforce these Regulations.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/regulation/19/made

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to stop posting asking for advice and either follow the advice given, or ignore us and do your own thing. I suspect that if I trawled other consumer advice forums I'd see more of your threads.

 

They are not going to do anything so you need to decide if you are going to pursue this. I would suggest FOS in the first place, or suing. No-one here is going to give you a magical phrase that will sort this out - it is now down to you to act on the advice given or live with it. It is time to **** or get off the pot.

 

Don't rely on anyone else to sort it, and remember that the longer you leave it before instigating some sort of action the less likely it will be that you will win.

 

Ignore perpy - the consumer protection regs won't help you. You can't enforce them or take action on the back of them. Your claim is simple breach of contract.

 

hi thanks for the reply, harsh but true i guess.

 

anyway i have done as suggested on here and sent letters to both the company and also my credit card company.

 

this was over a week ago, heard nothing from credit card company yet, but the phone call i got off the shop is there way of saying they are not willing to move on this.

 

consumer direct have now passed this onto our local trading standards ofice who i should here off within the next 3 days.

 

i have started to gather some info on how to use money claim online.

 

i am not going to be pushed around by this company.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to be taken seriously the need is of course to go about it in a sufficiently serious fashion.

 

Otherwise, if you go to court with a complaint to make that is tantamount to an allegation of a criminal offence, the judge could want to know what you did about it and if no complaint was made to an enforcement authority it is not so unlikely then that the allegation is indeed "laughed out of court", so to speak.

 

At the very least therefore, I would send a written complaint to Treading Standards, referring explicitly to the evidence and the relevant legislation, in order to have as much as that to be taken seriously, as need be.

 

It is possible in any case that a judge could reserve his judgement, pending the outcome of an official investigation, so it makes no sense to avoid the event if that is what some would rather you do.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...