Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eviction question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I rent a room in a house, and electricity is included in the rent.

 

Before signing the assured shorthold tenancy tenancy agreement for the room, I told my landlord that I had an electric heater on at night. He said he didn't have a problem with that.

 

He's now realised that my electric heater is costing him more than he'd anticipated, and wants to raise the rent.

 

There's nothing in my tenancy agreement about rent increases. Can he increase the rent against my will?

 

If I tell him that I am unwilling to pay any extra rent, can he evict me?

 

My tenancy agreement is ongoing; it says that, if he hasn't asked me to leave after 2 months of the tenancy starting, then it will continue until I give a month's notice.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When did you move in and what was the initial fixed term?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I moved in at the beginning of April, and the initial fixed term was for 2 months.

 

My agreement says:

 

'You will have the property and the furniture from 1st April 2010 to 31st May 2010. If, at the end of this time, you want to continue the tenancy and you have not already received from us two months' notice to end the tenancy, it will carry on from month to month as a monthly contractual tenancy.'

 

When did you move in and what was the initial fixed term?
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Landlord can increase rent by:

- Getting you to sign a new tenancy.

- Serving a valid S13 rental increase notice.

 

If he does neither, he cannot enforce increase in rent. However, if you refuse, bear in mind that you can be evicted with two months notice.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he served S13 and you challenged it, it would go before a rent assessment comittee.

 

He would have to go to court to enforce a S21 eviction, if it went that far.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens...

 

My landlord now claims that, if the heating costs become excessive (in his view), then he can install onto the face of the plugs a device that will limit the amount of electricity that I can receive.

 

He said he can legally do this without giving me any notice, and even if I deny him permission to enter my room. Is he right?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Jeff

 

If he served S13 and you challenged it, it would go before a rent assessment comittee.

 

He would have to go to court to enforce a S21 eviction, if it went that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dennis

 

Yes, it does.

 

I stated in an earlier post that my contract wasn't fixed term. It turns out it is - it expires in April next year (I misread the year).

 

In light of this, can my landlord evict me or raise the rent against my will?

 

He claims that, because I work from home, which my tenancy agreement prohibits, he could get me evicted on that basis. Is he right?

 

Thanks

 

Jeff

 

Does you room have a lock? If so, no he cannot enter without your permission at all unless it is an actual emergency, ie water pouring through the ceiling, total electric failure etc.
Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say work from home, are you self employed? Or working for an employer?

 

Hes talking rubbish about the electric limiting btw.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking, I'm not sure either description applies to me! :)

 

I'm a self-employed gambler.

 

Jeff

 

When you say work from home, are you self employed? Or working for an employer?

 

Hes talking rubbish about the electric limiting btw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh, if you have a 12 months lease then the landlord cannot evict you at all unless you breach the original lease, ie don't pay rent, damage the property or are excessively noisy etc.

 

If he included electricity at the time of that lease he cannot now restrict it or increase your rent. Tough luck on the landlord for doing something so silly AFAIK.

 

Does the lease say 'you may not work from home' or does it say 'you may not run a business from home'. VERY different things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the lease say 'you may not work from home' or does it say 'you may not run a business from home'. VERY different things.

 

Doesnt matter. Only the second term is enforceable in any event.

 

JeffW - an interesting career choice :-D

 

On (for example) a credit application, do you put self employed? Do you pay tax as if self employed (I hope you pay tax on this - although thats a very different conversation!)?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dennis

 

It says that I should not 'carry on any profession, business or trade in the property', so unfortunately that applies to me.

 

Could my landlord not argue in court that my breach of my contract by working at home has incurred him an additional expense, in that I will have my heater on during the day during winter?

 

Regards

 

Jeff

 

oh, if you have a 12 months lease then the landlord cannot evict you at all unless you breach the original lease, ie don't pay rent, damage the property or are excessively noisy etc.

 

If he included electricity at the time of that lease he cannot now restrict it or increase your rent. Tough luck on the landlord for doing something so silly AFAIK.

 

Does the lease say 'you may not work from home' or does it say 'you may not run a business from home'. VERY different things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr Shed

 

I have a default, so I don't fill in many credit application forms! :)

 

I don't pay tax - income from gambling is tax exempt in the UK. If it weren't, then every self-employed person in the country who loses money on the horses would be able to claim his losses as a business expense!

 

Jeff

 

Doesnt matter. Only the second term is enforceable in any event.

 

JeffW - an interesting career choice :-D

 

On (for example) a credit application, do you put self employed? Do you pay tax as if self employed (I hope you pay tax on this - although thats a very different conversation!)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies - you are of course correct. I thought that if you were doing it for a living the scenario may be different, but HMRC website tells me otherwise :)

 

Ironically enough, this also answers the question - the government do not class being a professional gambler as a trade.

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/bim22017.htm

 

As such, you are not in breach of contract.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

True, although whether a judge considering a housing matter would take that view is another matter. :)

 

BTW, do you think that, by threatening to install a device on my plugs that would limit the amount of electricity I could use, my landlord was committing the criminal act of demanding money with menaces?

 

Jeff

 

Apologies - you are of course correct. I thought that if you were doing it for a living the scenario may be different, but HMRC website tells me otherwise :)

 

Ironically enough, this also answers the question - the government do not class being a professional gambler as a trade.

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/bim22017.htm

 

As such, you are not in breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True, although whether a judge considering a housing matter would take that view is another matter. :)

 

I cant see that he can take it any other way. The government stance is that you are not trading. As such if he viewed it differently, he would be wrong.

 

BTW, do you think that, by threatening to install a device on my plugs that would limit the amount of electricity I could use, my landlord was committing the criminal act of demanding money with menaces?

 

Jeff

 

Thats a stretch. However, he could be committing unlawful eviction...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because I told him. :)

 

I'm always in when he visits, and he asked me if I was working, so I told him the situation.

 

With hindsight, I should have just told him something truthful but misleading, like 'I don't have a job right now'!

 

Jeff

 

Next question. How does your landlord know you are 'working' from home?
Link to post
Share on other sites

It really doesnt matter, its no basis to evict.

 

I would advise the following.

 

- He cannot raise the rent.

- He cannot "restrict" your electricity.

 

If he persists, I would write a letter to him, polite but formal, stating that he is not permitted to restrict the electricity, and that any attempt to do so is in breach of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. Furthermore, a breach of this act (unlawful eviction) is a criminal act, punishable with a jail term.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...