Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I found that the parkin attended has a car with CCTV camera on it, however as I stated earlier, it seems that he did not take video of my car otherwise they would have stated so in the SAR. parking car .pdf
    • The rules state that "approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances"  I was not a threat. I was not present. I did not drive away. I think he has not fulfilled the necessary requirements justifying issuing me a PCN by post therefore the PCN was issued incorrectly and not valid.  What are your thoughts?  
    • I have also found this:  D.2 Service of a PCN by post: 54) There are some circumstances in which a PCN (under Regulation 10) may be served by post: 1) where the contravention has been detected on the basis of evidence from an approved device (approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances) 2) if the CEO has been prevented, for example by force, threats of force, obstruction or violence, from serving the PCN either by affixing it to the vehicle or by giving it to the person who appears to be in charge of that vehicle 3) if the CEO had started to issue the PCN but did not have enough time to finish or serve it before the vehicle was driven away and would otherwise have to write off or cancel the PCN 55) In any of these circumstances a PCN is served by post to the owner and also acts as the NtO. The Secretary of State recommends that postal PCNs should be sent within 14 days of the contravention. Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations. This from London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The question is what is an approved device? Certainly, he had the opportunity to place the ticket on my car and I didn't drive away.  I looked further and it seems that an approved device is a CCTV camera - It seems that the photos taken were not actual film but images and it is not clear if they are taken from a video or are stills. I'm guessing if it was moving images then the SAR would have stated this.    From the Borough of Hounslow website: "There are two types of PCN issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, which governs parking contraventions. The first is served on-street by a Civil Enforcement Officer, who will observe a vehicle and collect evidence before serving the PCN either by placing it in a plastic wallet under the windscreen wiper, or by handing it to the driver. The second is a PCN served by post, based on CCTV footage taken by an approved device, which has been reviewed by a trained CCTV Operator."   From Legislation.gov.uk regarding approved devices: Approved Devices 4.  A device is an approved device for the purposes of these Regulations if it is of a type which has been certified by the Secretary of State as one which meets requirements specified in Schedule 1. SCHEDULE 1Specified requirements for approved devices 1.  The device must include a camera which is— (a)securely mounted on a vehicle, a building, a post or other structure, (b)mounted in such a position that vehicles in relation to which relevant road traffic contraventions are being committed can be surveyed by it, (c)connected by secure data links to a recording system, and (d)capable of producing in one or more pictures, a legible image or images of the vehicle in relation to which a relevant road traffic contravention was committed which show its registration mark and enough of its location to show the circumstances of the contravention. 2.  The device must include a recording system in which— (a)recordings are made automatically of the output from the camera or cameras surveying the vehicle and the place where a contravention is occurring, (b)there is used a secure and reliable recording method that records at a minimum rate of 5 frames per second, (c)each frame of all captured images is timed (in hours, minutes and seconds), dated and sequentially numbered automatically by means of a visual counter, and (d)where the device does not occupy a fixed location, it records the location from which it is being operated. 3.  The device and visual counter must— (a)be synchronised with a suitably independent national standard clock; and (b)be accurate within plus or minus 10 seconds over a 14-day period and re-synchronised to the suitably independent national standard clock at least once during that period. 4.  Where the device includes a facility to print a still image, that image when printed must be endorsed with the time and date when the frame was captured and its unique number. 5.  Where the device can record spoken words or other audio data simultaneously with visual images, the device must include a means of verifying that, in any recording produced by it, the sound track is correctly synchronised with the visual image.
    • Hearing took place today.  Case dismissed with costs awarded. Neither UKPC or a representative turned up.  Apparently they messaged the court on 7 May asking for their case to be considered on paper.  Never informed me, which was criticised by the judge as not following procedure.  I was really annoyed as I would have preferred for the case to be thrown out before the hearing, or at least face them in court and see them squeal.   They are just playing a numbers game and hope you blink 1st!   Ended up having to change my flight, but  the costs awarded softens the blow. Was asked to confirm it was my signature on both the witness statement and supplementary statement.  Wasn't asked to read them, said she could see my arguments made and the signs were insufficient and no contract formed. Took maybe 10 mins in total.  Judge did most of the talking and was best for me just to keep quiet or confirm any statements made. Happy to have won as a matter of principle and have costs awarded. Maybe not worth all the time and hassle for any newbies or the technologically challenged.  But if you are stubborn like me and willing to put in the time and effort, you can beat these vultures! I big shout out to everyone who helped on the thread with their advice and guidance, special mention to FTMDave, thank you sir!  Really appreciate everyone's efforts. All the best!
    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord has stolen from us.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there....

 

I recently left a flat in south london, i shared the flat with 3 other people.

 

We had a good relationship with our landlord ( no estate agents involved) untill he and his wife decided to divorce.

 

The landlord then decided to sell his house to settle his divorce with his wife.The flat was in no state to be sold, as the tennants below us had illegally knocked a wall down inside their flat, causing our lounge wall to slowly start sinking.

 

I brough this to the attention of the landlord who then got workers in to fix the problem.For a while we had to put up with workmen in our flat while they hid the problem rather than fixed it.

Straight after that the estate agents were asked to sell the house and we were told we would be given a months notice when someone bought the house.

 

well for three months, no one put in an offer for the house, and we had estate agents flowing through the property solid for this amount of time, an average of 4 to 5 apointments a day except Sundays, i would often wake up on a saturday morning with and esate agents standing in my room showing potential buyers around.

We eventually complained to the landlord, who pleaded with us to be patient as he was desperate to sell the house, he said he would compensate us with cash to make up for it.Well that was a load of bull, obviously to get us off his case.

 

The estate agents didnt stop coming round and no one would buy the house, as tennants we realised the only way to win, was to move out.

 

we all gave the landlord our final months notice at the same time.

 

The landlord phoned me up very annoyed when we did this, moaning at me on the phone, telling me we cant just serve notice and move, even though he told us we were now on a month to month notice till his flat got sold.

 

The landlord lives in Spain, and he never once bothered to come over to England during this time.Even when we moved out, we asked him when he would come and get the keys, he ignored us, we asked him when he would come and do the final inventory, he ignored us.

 

We eventually spent our last weekend in the flat with no site of the landlord, we scrubbed the flat down, took photos of everything and left the flat empty.

 

The Landlord simply refused to answer our calls or E-mails.

 

i kept E-mailing the landlord asking him when we would get our deposits back, till i got to the point where i threatend to get a third party involved, waallaa....he replied.

He said he would pay the money into our respective accounts the next day, an amount totalling £1230.

 

Well the weeks went by and no money was paid into our accounts, so i got a lawyer involved.

Our lawyer did the favour for us through a freind of a freind, hence why i still need advice from this forum.

 

We have sent two letters asking the landlord to pay up, he has just ignored us.

 

My fear is, that he no longer lives at the address in Spain ( becuase of the divorce) If he is still living there, we have no proof that hes seen our letters.

 

I have also since find out that he owns numerous houses in London, including the one we lived in.

 

Is there any other way we can get him to pay?

How else do we get him to acknowledge us??

Ive been speaking to other people about this and they seem to think i should just drop it and forget about it becuase hes got away with it.

 

If there is nothing i can do about my personal case, then is there not some way we can get the bigger picture looked at, becuase this is such a common case with private landlords.

 

Advice apreciated..

 

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello,

 

we also had an overseas landlord (Overseas Landlord post for for more info).

He also decided to hold onto our deposit, for no reason whatsoever, and we didn't think we could do anything about it.

 

If you did not let through an estate agent based in the UK, did you use a power of attorney in the UK? Who did you pay your rent to? Here's the legal stuff you need, from someone a few months further on in the small claims process to you :o)

 

Residential Landlord - Landlord regulations

 

Section 47, Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

 

This legislation requires that every demand for rent carries the address of the landlord and if that address is outside England and Wales the demand for rent must also carry an address in England and Wales where notices in proceedings can be served on the landlord.

 

Failure to comply with section 47 means that any portion of the rent which is attributable to service charge is not lawfully due. The address of the landlord on such a written demand could be the landlord’s office address, rather than home address.

Section 48 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

 

This requirement is very similar to section 47 but with a subtle difference – it requires that the tenant must be given an address in England where notice of proceedings can be served on the landlord – it follows that this address does not have to be that of the landlord.

 

Until section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 is complied with rent is not lawfully due.

What this basically means is that it is illegal not to have an address in the UK to pay rent to, and serve papers on. The person you pay the rent to is the person you can take to the small claims court to get your deposit back. If this isn't the case then they have taken money from you unlawfully and you can claim all of the rent you've ever paid back from them.

 

Good luck! Don't let him get away with it.

 

WendyN

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi, Im back.....

 

I went ahead and got my lawyer to check the land registry and the landlord DOES still own the house here in the UK.

So i now have a UK address where notice on proceedings can be served.In the process i have also found out that the landlord DOES still live at the same address in Spain meaning hes just choosen to ignore our solicitors letters.

 

Yesterday i posted two LBA ,registered mail, to his UK and Spanish addresses.

 

Thanks for your bit of advice WendyN.

 

Ill post the final result here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...