Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO Services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4784 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have today received a letter from HFO services claiming that I owe them X amount of money due to a Barclay Card that I defaulted on several years ago.

 

They say I have 3 days before the case will be passed to their solicitors. Having checked the advice on the forums I am going to send them the following letter:

 

Dear XXXX:

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee.

 

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

 

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

 

 

Sincerely,

XXXX

 

Does anyone have any more advice on what I should do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Yes - Don't send it - that is an out of date letter I will get you an up to date one. This is no longer a criminal offence.

 

Before I do this - have you had any more contact with them than this letter? Other letters/phone calls? as it may be best to actually ignore them for the time being. The letter you have received is standard rubbish and really nothing to worry about on its own but these are a nasty bunch.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12+2 days or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Tradinglink3.gif Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

If you intend to send a reconstituted copy of the CCA you must declare the reason why it has been reconstituted and if the original exists and in what form (microfiche) etc

 

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

(Optional)

You should also note that I will only discuss this matter in writing and should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you or any of your associates.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance. (Optional)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

Print name do not signlink3.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that HFO are doing the 3 day threat letter again, they haven't used that one for ages.... I wonder if it is due to it being near the end of the month and people after bonuses that we are getting a lot of new HFO and Bryan Carter posts today....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks for all the speedy replies! I was just about to pop out to the post office!

 

I previously received a few other letters, including the card telling me to call them as they were holding legal documents for me, which I ignored. Then I received a phone call at home from a friendly sounding man with an American accent. He told me some details and then how much I owed to which I replied that I didn't think he had the correct person and that I would have to look into the matter further because I wasn't aware of any outstanding debt to his company before hanging up. I then stopped taking calls from them and received this letter today threatening me with court action/bailiffs/etc if I don't pay up in 3 days.

 

They have already added about £500 to the original debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

Looks like they following their normal process - you are right to not speak to them on the phone and ignore their calls. If you do speak to them say 'in writing please' and hang up. As they trying to contact you, I think I would send them the CCA request but using the correct template, send recorded and do not sign. Wait 12 working days plus 2 for posting and then send the account in dispute letter which we can direct you to. You can also send a SAR request to Barclaycard which will tell you exactly what documentation exists for the original account and if it is enforcable. I will find the template for that.

 

Did you receive a 'Notice of Assignment' letter from HFO recently? If so, does this say who exactly the debt has been sold to?

 

Was the delivery card from Silverpoint Delivery services as we have a thread about this [problem]?

 

The 3 day letter is rubbish and the others are as well, probably. This company will use threats like Bailliffs and legal action when they have absolutely no grounds to do this and are preying on peoples' ignorance.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do a data SAR
link3.gif
to Barclaycard, it could be very revealing:wink:

SAR
link3.giflink3.giflink3.gif
letter to send to BC with £10 postal order by recorded delivery. Sign but put crosses through signature
link3.giflink3.giflink3.gif
.

 

[your address]

[their address]

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data
link3.giflink3.gif
which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history and it is not limited merely to 6 years
link3.giflink3.giflink3.gif
of historical information.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signature]

 

[name]

Send to :

BARCLAYCARD

Data Protection Team

Dept LRC

Northampton

NN4 7SG

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I might have had the 'notice of assignment' letter but it was put straight in the bin. And, yes, the card was from Silverpoint Delivery Services.

 

Keep all post in future including envelopes.

The SAR to Barclaycard is important.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Harassed Senior

 

Just trying to bring some lightheartedness into a troubled world - sorry if it is a problem

 

Absolutely no problem whatsoever - love it! Love your new Avatar also!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that HFO are doing the 3 day threat letter again, they haven't used that one for ages.... I wonder if it is due to it being near the end of the month and people after bonuses that we are getting a lot of new HFO and Bryan Carter posts today....

 

I think they are still sending them out as the first letter - they sent us one.

 

Interesteing thing is it was claiming about £1,000 more than they are now trying to take me to court for.

 

If they do this often - imagine how many people may panic and call them to arrange payments - or fall for their tactics.

 

That must be fraud.

 

Be interesting to ask all new hfo people on here how much is on the 72 hour letter and how much they end up claiming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And how many actually do pay the full amount HFO claim! It is about time the government put down this company and its dubious practices, and several other companies that I can think of - but these companies provide jobs for the lower end of the social spectrum so therefore are acceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indiebhoy

 

The SAR should provide all the original documentation that Barcalycard have about the account - if they have a credit agreement (doubtful due to the age of the account), any default notice they sent, statement of accounts which will show everything actually owed on the account including interest and charges (some of which can be challenged and will be a lot less than HFO are claiming) and best of all, who the account was sold to and when showing whether or not this was a valid sale.

 

If HFO ever try to progress this or tryed going through the courts you would have the information to fight it off.

 

HFO buy these debts for peanuts and then basically frighten people into paying up.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am based in the UK. They say that they have been trying to contact me with an 'offer' connected with my account. They say I have 3 days to pay in full before they hand it over to their solicitors.

 

They then threaten with a Warrant of Execution and Order to Obtain information.

 

They also attached a credit report from econsumerview which has accurate info about my credit history and address details but has my date of birth wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The threats are just total rubbish and their access to your data needs to be reported to the data provider, the OFT and the ICO.

 

Keep all correspondence in future.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...