Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non-Fault RTA, what are my legal rights re the ins co?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was in my car on the 28th September, seen a combine harvester cutting the corner i was aproaching, i pull off the road, and he hits us.

I have good photographic evidence of the accident scene whilst awaiting the ambulance and police.

 

Farmer has been charged with it, and it will be a nice list, from his road tax being out of date since 2006, even though it's nil duty he still has a legal obligation to have a valid one to no escort vehicle driving the machine farther than allowed (almost 15 miles was his intended distance)

 

Anyhow, from the start it's been a pest.

 

Day after accident I call my his ins co and mine, mine are to be honest a bunch of :sad: I'm fully comp insurance, my company tell me yes, we'll get onto it, no courtesy car!

His ins co Chaucer are less than helpfull, they say they need to wait for him to call them, which is fair comment, the following Fri he decides to report it, and after being charged and the photographic evidence etc...F:mad2: denies liability and blatantly lies about the circumstances.

to date he still hasn't returned the form whichever one that may be to his ins co, and it's delaying the process.

If I go through my ins co i'll need to pay £750 excess, which is utter garbage since it's non-fault.

 

anyhow what legal rightsw if any do i have to 'demand' the car is fixed, the car is a Subaru Impreza CATALUNYA LTD Edition, only 200 built and a replacement cannot be had for less than £5000, the car has suffered extensive panel damage...but NO structural damage, ie chassis leg A pillar etc.

 

My ins company said if they write it off i have absolutely zero right to any of the salvage and will absolutely not be allowed to keep it or buy it from them.

Is this correct?

My intention is right reason or not, the cat is going to be fixed, whether by myself or a bodyshop.

It is fixable, easy repair and i'm 100% competent enough to do the job.

 

Short of beating mr farmer profusely to the head and body with a stick what the heck can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really find it depressing that Insurance companies are bl**dy useless in explaining issues.

 

In short this is not going to be an easy process with an uncooperative 3rd party driver an 3rd party Insurer. You need the Police report on the accident to be helpful to you.

 

You can't buy the salvage if the category of the write off does not allow the Insurers to sell it to you. They would be breaking the law if they did. You can of course have the car inspected to determine the write off category yourself, but this will be at your cost. I don't know how you would go about getting another inspection. Would you just arrange for a qualified vehicle examiner/engineer to inspect and to provide a report.

 

I really suggest that you contact your Insurers and ask to speak to a manager or someone senior to discuss the claim, advising them that so far the company have not been helpful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of questions; have you got legal protection? If yes, why arn't they dealing with this for you? Also ask them why you can't have a courtesy car as it is quite clear you are not at fault here.

 

Because of your insurer's position regarding the possible write off (and courtesy car), I would be tempted to write to the TP (recorded delivery) stating that as he was clearly at fault and been charged accordingly, you will be hiring a car while yours is off the road and will be claiming for this in addition to all your other un-insured losses and of course for the repairs to your car. Include a copy of at least 2 estimates (unless your car is un-driveable). From what you have said, it is clear that the police consider that he was totally at fault so as suggested, you need a copy of their report. At the end of the day, your claim seems pretty solid to me so although you may suffer some out of pocket expence intitially, you stand to recover these including your excess. End your letter by saying that you will require settlement of any costs in full within 14 days to avoid any recovery action and advise him to pass the letter onto his insurers should he wish them to act on his behalf.

 

Others will no doubt add to this but please keep us posted.

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I failed to mention (my bad I'm sorry) I've went to driver assist, and they have supplied the courtesy car and arranged a lawyer up here to deal with my uninsured losses and my wife and two daughters injury claims, I only suffered a bit bruise and sore neck, which is actually still painfull so won't really be claiming for that be a bit silly?

I do have legal cover but first central say they will not and would not give a courtesy car untill vehicle went for repair, if it was deemed a write off i still wouldn't get one.

The market value for the car is £5000 it';s an impreza catalunya, which is a Ltd Edition, 200 built this being build no 20. How much can I insist on to an aprox rough figure that they repair it? (i've actually got all the panels required to fix it myself) and would they compromise if I were to give the parts I have to the bodyshop to use in it's repair.

Truthfully I have every reciept and full service history inc original bill of sale for the cat, it is in immaculate condition and I've got tons of pictures to back this up, and as such I was going to argue that since it wasn't my fault the car should be repaired up to perhaps £4500 worth (the bodyshop quoted around £2300)

Just need some lee-way on my side before it ends up I need to fix the car and take farmer to court to attempt to re-coup the losses for repairing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The info regarding keeping the salvage is wrong, it's always yours until you tell the insurer they can keep it. Regardless of catagorisation. You may not legally be allowed to put it back on the road, but that does not stop your right of breaking a it for parts. The FOS in most cases will side with the policyholder, it's your property not theirs.

If a cat A (burn out) or B (break up only)You really don't want to do this though, only if it's a cat c or d you can put it back on the road (will need an mot or a VIC test , your current insurers may not even offer cover back for it).

Re: figures, a cat c is where the repairs would be more than the £5k value, if they cat d it, it wil work on the salvage figure, if they work n a standard say 15% salvage return, if the repair costs come to more than 85% it will be written off. There are variations in how this is deal, my figures are only hypothetical. with a car like this, they could be geting a good salvage deal, hence the lower margin for repair

If you want them to repair the vehicle, you could always provide your own garage quote, they may accept this, or offer you the csah settlement, or get the garage to do a contract repair, where they do it for a set price, without any opportunity to negotiate if futher damage found - not too many garages take up this offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...