Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
    • I believe it to be, yes. no payment or acknowledgement of any debt to them since Feb 2018
    • Original credit agreement for them to prove the debt. Post 2 is the pro rota, I did this to the Original creditors sometime ago with offers of payment i got no reply, soon after the dca started sending me letters and phone calls. Thanks 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are banks allowed to issue second or ongoing default notices?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have default on my credit file from santander (cahoot) from 2005, the debt is still not settled though, and it's likely I'll still be on a payment plan with them for several years.

 

Since my default will drop off my file next year (it'll be 6 years), are Santander allowed to put new default notices on my file (for as long as I'm not making normal repayments and have interest frozen)? Someone told me that if they wanted, they could put a notice on my credit file every month until the debt is settled - this will be quite annoying considering I'm 6 months away from being default free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great, so they only thing they can do is put a CCJ (which I can hopefully fend off). I've already go a copy of my statutory report from all agencies, and am also signed up to creditexpert - which is a ripoff by the way.

 

I wonder what my file will say next summer, when the default is gone, but there's still this mysterious outstanding amount to Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all, and I guess they could in theory go straight to CCJ and give me no opportunity to prevent this? Is this likely?

 

I'm trying to keep santander at bay while I throw all I have at a higher priority debt, and don't want them rubbishing my credit file in the mean time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that a default could be issued as many times as they like and it's only once they follow it up via a letter of termination that no further default notices can be issued?

 

It's only one default on a credit file granted but if it's not on a credit file and is simply a creditor issuing them then it's up to them ...

 

That was what I thought anyway.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that a default could be issued as many times as they like and it's only once they follow it up via a letter of termination that no further default notices can be issued?

 

If the default was remedied within the 14 days (i.e. brought up-to-date) then another default notice could be sent at a later stage should the debtor fall behind again. An account would only default once the 14 days have expired. As far as I was always trained (and as far as my interpretation of the CCA is concerned) is that a default can only ever happen once. Once an account has been breached, you cannot unbreach it! It's a bit like a rope being cut in half!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There certainly seems to be a topic open to discussion here.

 

I have read on other sites that purport that the person answering is a trained Solicitor, that although as has been said a defaulted default? can only occur once in the lifetime of a debt, there is nothing to stop them being reported ad infinitum for as long as they remain unpaid, on your credit report, ie, putting them back on as soon as they fall off - I really cannot believe that that is the case otherwise there would really be little point to the credit file agencies really would there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all the replies, it looks like there are some different thoughts on this. It might be better to break it down into two issues: the default notice letter, and the default notice on the credit file.

 

The default notice letter: In my experience I have received multiple ones of these from the same creditor, all advising me of x number of days to remedy the situation.

 

The Default on credit file: As mentioned before, I have one of these from 5 years ago, and it'll drop off my file next summer. Since the debt is still not settled, and regardless of how many default notices LETTERS they may send me, can they put a new default on my file? I would hope their only next option is to go for the CCJ.

 

I'm going to contact experian myself with this question (got to get something from my £8 a month creditexpert subscription).

 

I really need to get a definite answer on this, as it will be a big influence on my whole strategy here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FSpencer..Sequenci is correct, one default per debt on your credit file, once it's been entered onto your file it can not (should not) be adjusted and will naturally drop off your file 6 years to the day....no they cannot change the default date...and what I assume you mean is that with each spurious default notice they're sending you ..you're thinking they can update your credit file from that date? Nope, it starts from the date it was first entered.

 

Just as an aside here, I had a default registered by Egg, it dropped off my file as it should have done 6 years to the day, that I thought was the end of it...but not with egg because several months later my credit file

was updated by egg again and they had adjusted both the amount of money owing and the default date, in essence extending it by 6 months...altogether against all the guidelines/regulations/data protection act..

I contacted the CRA's who wrote to egg and egg removed the newly added defaults. I've since progressed my complaints against their stupidity with the OFT, ICO and TS ...

 

As for my previous comments re default notices (as opposed to default entries on a credit file) and sequenci's clarification afterwards...I think Sequenci's opinion is correct.

Edited by Deb T

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the many users get confused between

 

markers

 

and

 

default notices

 

and

 

default sum letters

 

 

markers [late payment/over limit/no pay etc etc]

can be and are reported every month to the CRA's and 'mark' your file.

 

a default notice is a one off thing until the 'reason' on the DN is rectified.

 

if its not, they cannot issue another one.

 

if you make an 'arrangement to pay' then break it, i 'think' a further DN can be sent as the old one would have benn 'rectified' by making the 'arrangement'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...