Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, why do DVLA (via that leaflet) say that S.88 MAY allow a driver to be treated as if they have a valid licence (after an application that discloses a medical condition) ?
    • Thanks for that, Bazza. It sheds some more light on things but I’m still by no means sure of the OP’s father’s likelihood of successfully defending the charge. This in particular from the guidance stands out me: He does not meet all the s88 criteria. S88 is clear and unambiguous: It makes no provision for either the driver or a medical professional to make a judgement on his fitness to drive under s88. S92(4) and the June 2013 guidance you mention defines in what circumstances the SoS must issue a licence. It does no modify s88 in any way. However, delving further I have noticed that the DVLA provides a service where the driver can enter a relevant medical condition to obtain the correct documentation to apply for a licence: https://www.gov.uk/health-conditions-and-driving/find-condition-online I haven’t followed this through because I don’ have the answers that the OP’s father would give to the questions they will ask and in any case it requires the input of personal information and I don’t want to cause complications with my driving licence. It is possible, however, that the end result (apart from providing the necessary forms) is a “Yes/No” answer to whether the driver can continue to drive (courtesy of s88). With that in mind, I should think at  the very least the OP’s father should have completed that process but there is no mention that he has. The Sleep Apnoea Trust gives some useful guidance on driving and SA: https://sleep-apnoea-trust.org/driving-and-sleep-apnoea/detailed-guidance-to-uk-drivers-with-sleep-apnoea/ I know nothing about SA at all and found It interesting to learn that there are various “grades” of the condition. But the significant thing which struck me is that it is only the least trivial version that does not require a driver to report his condition to the DVLA. But more significant than that is that the SA Trust makes no mention of continuing to drive once the condition has been reported. The danger here is that the court will simply deconstruct s88 and reach the same conclusion that I have. I accept, having looked at the DVLA guidance, that there may be (as far as they are concerned) scope for s88 to apply contrary to the conditions stated in the legislation. Firstly, we don’ know whether there is and secondly we don’t know whether the OP’s father would qualify to take advantage of it. Of course he could argue that he need no have reported his condition. The SA trust certainly emphasises that the condition should not be reported until a formal detailed diagnosis is obtained. But the fact is he did report it. As soon as he does that, as far as I can see,  s88 is no longer available to him. Certainly as it stands I maintain my opinion that he was not allowed to continue driving under s88. The only way I would change this is to see the end result of the DVLA exercise I mentioned above. If that said he could continue driving he would have a defence to the charge. Without it I am not confident.  
    • Americans are already keen on UK-made coins, and the Mint said it has seen a 118 per cent increase in sales to the US since 2022.View the full article
    • Right, my friend has just called me. He has indeed had to cancel bookings in the past from his end. There is a specific number for Booking.com that he calls.   After that Booking.com jump into action and contact you re refund and/or alternative accommodation. I suppose it's all logical - the party cancelling the booking has to inform Booking.com. So the gite owner needs to contact Booking.com on the cancellation number.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is This CCA Enforcable?


sploits
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am currently helping a friend with a Barclaycard problem he has. The card was signed for by my friend in 2000 and I asked him to get a copy of the CCA for it (I didn't expect it to turn up purely because of the age of it). It was originally a Morgan Stanley card but I'm guessing somewhere down the line Barclaycard took them over.

The CCA they have sent looks more like an application form to me (well it does say application form at the top haha) and they sent out a copy of the terms and conditions but they look like present terms and conditions and not the T&C's that will have been in place in 2000 (I can upload them if needed).

I now await your responses to the enforceability of this CCA (or application form) and any advice on what to do next.

 

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/chris/bc1.jpg

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/chris/bc2.jpg

 

Thanking you all in advanced

 

Sploits

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sploits,

 

MSDW was taken over by Goldfish and then BC.

 

If the 2nd page with the Prescribed Terms is the back of the 1st page, then I'd say the agreement looks enforceable.

 

If the 2 pages are not front and back of a single document, then I think the agreement may not be enforceable.

 

However, the only way this will be decided is by a judge in court and that will be a very long way off. YF can't start action re unenforceability on the a/c but could certainly make a defence against any court action started by the bank or it's DCA.

 

YF would be wise to reclaim any penalty charges on the a/c along with compound interest, to reduce the a/c balance.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

The CCA actually came on 2 seperate pages (as a photocopy) so I'm not sure if the T&C's were on the back page or a seperate page. What would be the best way to find this out? SAR?

 

Thank you for your input so far

 

Sploits

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again slick,

 

I'm just reading through the link 2 on your signature and might have found something. Should the agreement not say what his credit limit was for the card (ie £3,000)? I'm just curious of 3(iii) on the link. Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

 

Thanks

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sploits,

 

You'll get nothing more from BC about the agreement - you're in the minority actually getting a copy of the agreement at all.

 

The only reason to send a SAR is if you think there are any penalty charges or mis-sold PPI on the a/c, and you don't have statements for the last 6 years to check. Penalty charges can still be reclaimed in full plus interest on credit card a/c's.

 

Check the copy documents to see if they appear to front and back of the one document. Check the size, look for corresponding folds, creases, marks. See if the content actually makes sense if any part refers to another, eg "see section 3(b) on reverse of this document".

 

The credit limit is referred to and is adequately dealt with in Section 1. of the Financial and Related Particulars.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

I have checked the photocopied document that they have sent us and I can't see any signs of creases there are black lines here and there but I'm guessing that could be from anything (bit of dirt on photocopier/fax). I also can't find anything that says about anything being overleaf or on the reverse of the document. There is 1 thing that is buggingme about this CCA though. If you have a look at the following:

http://www.dj-sploits.co.uk/random/chris/bc1.jpg

Section 4 (your finances) - Where it says "Time with Bank/Building Society" it has a big white square just underneath and that has been blanked out (it runs into the transfer balance request). I'm not sure why they would send it out with that covered. I'm not entirely sure what would be there that they would need to cover up.

 

Soooooo where do we go from here?

 

Thank you for all your help so far slick, it is much appreciated

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are lucky to get a copy of the agreement. I have only received reconstructed T&C's from Barclaycard for the time I opened the account.

 

Only problem is, the account was with Morgan Stanley. Despite repeated requests and me pointing out that they had not sent t&c's and copy of agreement for Morgan Stanley, they have insisted that they have sent what is legally required to them.

 

I contacted trading standards in december. They called me but have never followed my compliant up despite them verbally agreeing I had not been sent what was required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sploits,

 

Re the blocked-out section, I've seen this before and it concealed security info or your secret password - something like that.

 

You should work on the basis that the agreement is enforceable. If YF is having difficulty paying the a/c, check the Debt Issues forum for help with getting the bank to accept reduced payments.

 

Also, make sure any penalty charges or PPI are reclaimed with interest.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

I will pass the info on to my friend and let him choose the best course of action. I'm just a little shocked that a CCA from 2000 is enforceable (also shocked it actually turned up at all).

 

Cheers,

 

Sploits

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...