Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have read through a number of similar threads, but one thing i'm not sure how to proceed about is that I live abroad in the middle east and have done for several years. The claim letter was sent to my parents address and I really don't want them to be harassed about this. I am sure I sent the original creditor a registered letter with my change of address but can't find this currently. I am not in a position to pay this, and tend to come back to the UK to see family at most once a year (less since Covid), so not particular bothered about my financial score...more concerned about harassment of my parents. I have not registered on the gov gateway or anything like that.  Details below (as best as i can), and thank you for taking the time to look into it. Also redacted claim form attached: Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre (Northampton) If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 23/5/24   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM Tues, 11/6/24 (19 days)  Thurs, 25/6/24 (33 days)   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The Claimant claims the sum of £7926 for an outstanding debt owed. On 20/4/18 the Defendent entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank for a Credit Card under reference [16 numbers]. On 10/5/22 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £7296. On 28/11/23 the debt of £7296 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925. The Claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) to act on its behalf and the CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £7925   What is the total value of the claim? £8481 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? I believe I sent a letter by registered mail of a change in address to abroad in 2021. Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not personally - probably sent to my parents   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not personally - probably sent to my parents   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford, living abroad   What was the date of your last payment? Unsure (probably 2021)   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No     Claim form 23-5-24.pdf
    • While we wait for someone to explain how farage is any better than sunak  .. if not worse   One of many likely upcoming belly laughs   Reform chairman Richard Tice has accused the Tories of (reform like) “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew his papers to stand at the last minute and endorsed former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson. In a dramatic final 24 hours before nominations closed there had been fevered speculation that as many as six Tory MPs and other candidates could defect to Reform after Nigel Farage decided to stand in Clacton and become leader. But instead no Tories switched and Tom Wellings, the Reform candidate for the new seat of Stone, Great Wryly and Penkridge in Staffordshire, quit and put out a statement endorsing Sir Gavin.   Who does he think he is an Anderson, a Carswell !!! was heard at the reform HQ pub ... as Candidate brushed aside by Farage in clacton to run as an independent    Tice accuses Tories of ‘dirty tricks’ to persuade Reform candidates to stand down WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: A furious row has broken out after a Reform candidate’s last minute defection to the Tories   :ROFL  
    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request?   Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Defaults on my account that are satisified ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

These are due to drop off next year (2011) I believe as the actual date of default according to the report was 2005?

 

I have been reading on here and noticed people saying if they are satisified that they should not be there. One was a partial settlement however and the others i *think* were paid in full or settlements also.

 

I included a pic of the defaults as they appear on my report. Can anyone advise please?

 

http://i34.tinypic.com/k9avxg.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jason King

From what I gather, even though they are satisfied they remain on your file for the 6 years, just like a CCJ, although prospective lenders will be able to see they are satisfied.

 

I've not heard of Defaults being removed just on the basis they have eventually been satisfied unless, of course, one has negotiated with the lender to ask them to remove them, which is tough going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm thanks guys. It has left me with a few questions which I am unsure of.

 

 

  1. I thought I could just ask them for the original agreement and then have it removed when they cannot produce it. I am guessing nothing can be done because as it is satisfied they do not have to comply with a CCA request. However could I not just send them a SAR request and do it from there?
  2. Are my calculations correct, it is the date on the credit report you count 6 years from (ie 10/06/2005 > 10/06/2011) ?
  3. If a DCA started to bill me before the Six year drop off Could I then start sending off SAR requests (browsing through the site it seems so but just incase) ?

Thanks so much for your help everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I might start with the Halifax one as it is the furthest away from dropping off. I really am not sure however when to count 6 years from, I am assuming it is the default date as written in the credit report, or is it the last time the account was updated as some of them were updated in 2009 which would be disgusting if that was the case!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's YOUR last financial in/out that starts the clock ticking.

 

NOTHING barring a CCJ can reset it, other than YOU writing a letter that says [specifically] 'i ack this debt' and you sign it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's YOUR last financial in/out that starts the clock ticking.

 

NOTHING barring a CCJ can reset it, other than YOU writing a letter that says [specifically] 'i ack this debt' and you sign it.

 

dx

 

Im very sorry I do not understand what your saying to me. There are 3 dates on that report.

 

Special Instruction Start Date

Defaulted on

File Updated for the period to

 

Is it one of these dates, or is it simply the last time anything was paid to / from the card ? If it is the latter then I do not know when that would have been. Would a SAR not tell me anyway?

 

Very sorry again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said YOUR last financial transaction ......

 

the SAR should tell you that hopefully

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said YOUR last financial transaction ......

 

the SAR should tell you that hopefully

 

dx

 

Ah ok so basiclly the very last amount of money to the account, be it negative or positive. So those dates on the credit file mean sweet FA then? God damn it, i thought they would be dropping off in 2011 aswell. Good job i checked.

 

I did reclaim the charges off the account, I must check through those documents. I cannot remember though if that was a SAR or something else.

 

Thanks very much for your help DX, got there in the end

Link to post
Share on other sites

*edit*

 

Never mind. I thought i should ask them for the original CCA first before a SAR but i read on here somewhere that they do not have to comply if the account is satisfied which my Halifax one is.

 

I'll just SAR them i think. I will draw up a letter tonight and hopefully someone can give me advice on how it looks.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is an standard SAR template

scrollup and hit the library tab at the top.

 

please be clear.........the clock starts from YOUR last use of the A/c

be it to buy anything or to pay the monthly amount.

nothing to do with whatever they may do on the A/C.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is an standard SAR template

scrollup and hit the library tab at the top.

 

please be clear.........the clock starts from YOUR last use of the A/c

be it to buy anything or to pay the monthly amount.

nothing to do with whatever they may do on the A/C.

 

dx

 

Thanks DX

 

The standard SAR template talks about intrest etc but I have already claimed that back, so I guess i will just edit out bits that don't apply so I wont look stupid.

 

I'll let you know how I get on, as If it is when I last used the account it might already be 6 years ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno what you are looking at??????

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

is what you want.

 

++ you cant reclaim interest either.....

 

you are confusing me.......

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the defaults will drop off in 2011, regardless of the current status. the six years runs from termination of the account, so the date of settlement is irrelevant. you can settle the account 20 years after the default and the account should not reappear on your file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno what you are looking at??????

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

is what you want.

 

++ you cant reclaim interest either.....

 

you are confusing me.......

 

dx

 

Yeah I was looking at the wrong thing indeed doh!

 

So its 12 days + 2 yeah?

 

Thanks ;)

Edited by MountainGoat
Link to post
Share on other sites

the defaults will drop off in 2011, regardless of the current status. the six years runs from termination of the account, so the date of settlement is irrelevant. you can settle the account 20 years after the default and the account should not reappear on your file.

 

I may just leave it alone and not awaken a sleeping giant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok So i just looked through my account details for Style, I had previously did a SAR on them when i was trying to claim back charges without success. The very last activity on the account from me was on the Feb 2006 When I paid around £500. There was then another credit on the account which said write off done in June 2006 which left the account balance at £0.00.

 

So am I right in saying that i should be counting from Feb 2006 based on the fact that was the last activity with the account from myself personally? The write off must have been done by themselves in June 2006.

 

That being the case, and being that i owe them nothing, what would the next step be in trying to remove a default or is it correct to say that it cannot be done when the balance is at 0?

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim the charges.

 

if the DN balance had charges inc, then the DN must be invalid

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim the charges.

 

if the DN balance had charges inc, then the DN must be invalid

 

dx

 

Hey DX

 

Yeah the balance had late payment fees and intrest applied to it at silly rates (£16 a month) when i went over the limit throughout the account duration. I did try and claim the fees a long time ago but i got a letter telling me that the OFT limited its investagation to credit cards only. I will scan it and post it up here tomorrow.

 

So this would qualify it as an invalid DN?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

OFT my FOOT!

 

load of old cobbrers and you fell for it!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

OFT my FOOT!

 

load of old cobbrers and you fell for it!

 

 

dx

 

Just wasnt sure if they were telling the truth or not.

 

The office of fair trading has restricted its investagation to credit cards and has not consulted with style financial services in relation to other products, including store cards. As the account is a store card the charges are valid and will remain.

 

I realise that my response may not provide you with the outcome you expect, however I trust my explanation clarifies our position.

 

4rxr89.jpg

 

Thats what I recieved (2007). So if I am correct, I need to ask them to remove the default based on the fact the late payment fees applied on the account were illegal & I need to ask for a true original copy of the signed agreement?

Edited by MountainGoat
Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

not illegal...unlawful.

 

they were applied as a penalty that was not a true representation of their actual costs.

 

if the DN figure had any kind of unlawful charges inc in it, then that invalidates it.

 

as said before....you cannot get a copy of agreement as the contract is over.

see what the SAR brings they might inc it esp if you asked in the SAR letter.

 

incidently...its 40 calander days for an SAR.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

not illegal...unlawful.

 

they were applied as a penalty that was not a true representation of their actual costs.

 

if the DN figure had any kind of unlawful charges inc in it, then that invalidates it.

 

as said before....you cannot get a copy of agreement as the contract is over.

see what the SAR brings they might inc it esp if you asked in the SAR letter.

 

incidently...its 40 calander days for an SAR.

 

dx

 

Is there any point in doing the SAR if we know that the default is invalid? Perhaps a letter asking the default to be removed because of said charges being unawful would be better?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i just throw another spanner in the works here,.......

 

is there the possibility that you did not make the required payments on the style account for 6mts or so before the defaulted date?

if so, then the marker of 8, can be an automatic one by the cra system so thus style did not send a default notice.

 

any ideas on that? can you remember?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...