Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clear Associates


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

New on the forum - I have three or four debts outstanding at the moment - a couple informal arrangements - nothing major overdue or in litigation etc but today I received a letter, the brief outline as follows:-

 

Clear Associates, PO Box 7292, Corby, NN17 9BX Tel: 0800 1804136.

 

Dear Sir

 

Our client as requested that we contact you in relation to an important matter.

 

Please telephone this office, quoting reference xxxxxx to discuss this matter further etc.

 

Our client has a legilative obligation to update their file with data concerning change of address ....etc

 

If we do not receive any contact in the the stipulated time (NOT GIVEN!!), the record will be passed to our investigations department who will undertake various procedures which may include visiting the property .....etc.

 

 

This has worried me - I cannot seem to find any info on Clear Associates..has anyone dealt with them and if so who do they act on behalf of any help and advice would be very much appreciated.

 

 

Mkel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
If we do not receive any contact in the the stipulated time (NOT GIVEN!!), the record will be passed to our investigations department who will undertake various procedures which may include visiting the property .....etc.
Well, they cannot just invite themselves to your property. Invesitgations department sounds pretty pretentious and also ideas perhaps above their station where saying they 'may include visiting the property' ... more exploitation of consumer knowledge ie they cannot just show up and do that without your permission and of course you aren't going to give it are you.

 

 

Our client has a legilative obligation to update their file with data concerning change of address ....etc

 

Oh, well, if they are going to start quoting 'legislation' maybe they should look up what the OFT says about such things ie contacting a debtor not making themselves clear who they are nor what they want.

 

Yet another letter I presume from the mysterious DCAs not using a proper address ... Hmmm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Maybe, Clear needs some window cleaning, maybe Windowlene or something, then they can be more 'clear' to people who they are. Tsk tsk! ;):lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legislative - sorry about the typing!

 

I will inform consumer direct, one other thing? should I ignore, phone/write to see who they are - who their client is?

 

The letter has no other details other than the PO box address, telephone number - no details of the legal status I.e company, partnership or sole trader/practitioner etc - which i assume is wrong - I can scan and upload if required.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will inform consumer direct, one other thing? should I ignore, phone/write to see who they are - who their client is?

 

When you ring Consumer Direct tell them that you are aware of the OFT's Debt Collection Practices, and these clowns fall way short of complying with the OFT in not making it clear as to who they are, why they are contacting you, and what they want.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

Specifically this section;

2 UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES

Communication

2.1 It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, with consumers in an unclear,

inaccurate or misleading manner.

2.2 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. use of official looking documents intended or likely to mislead

debtors as to their status, for example, documents made to resemble court

claims.

b. leaving out or presenting information in such a way that it

creates a false or misleading impression or exploits debtors'

lack of knowledge

c. those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who

they work for, what their role is, what the purpose of the

contact is

d. unnecessary and unhelpful use of legal and technical language, for

example, use of Latin phrases

 

And NO, DON'T phone them EVER,

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Rick, you should start your own thread as this will go missed here,

Try this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=167

 

Give it your own title, "unclear Associates" or whatever and others will be able to see your new post and advise accordingly, welcome to CAG, happy New Year and all that Jazz!

 

You will need to explain what they want. how much roughly, and what it is for? How old it is etc etc etc....any dramas reply to this and I will hopefully be able to guide you further, but MOST importantly DO NOT RING THEM or speak to them OVER THE PHONE keep EVERYTHING in WRITING!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I had the exact same letter this morning, but however it was addressed to a female version of my first name! All very suspicious, and as far as I am aware I don't owe anybody anything now although I've had problems in the past due to divorce etc.

I am going to ignore the letter as it is far too vague, and I think it may be a Phishing [problem].

:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've had numerous voicemails left by an automated sort of thing: "Please call Clear Associates now on XXXXXXXXXX quoting reference XXXXXXX". Never a letter or any other form of contact. I'm totally ignoring them. I'd suggest the OP does the same until they actually reveal who they're representing. The reference number they gave me doesn't correspond with anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

they have phoned my work, my work will not pass on any details but they passed this info on to me. Hannah French from Clear associates wants to speak to me on 08001804136, but wouldn't say why. HOW DID THEY GET MY WORKS OFFICE NUMBER, AND HOW DO I STOP THIS!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them, make a formal complaint to the OFT&TS via consumer direct, and then to Ofcom. Keep a diary of events, with a SERIOUS view of taking legal action against them in court for the criminal offence of harassment.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a letter from them today, addressed to 'The Occupier' at my address, requesting information as to whether I currently reside here so 'they can update their records'. I have no knowledge of why they have a record for me, who they are working on behalf of (if anyone), what should I do with this letter, destroy it, keep it, ignore it?

 

Seems like an unfair business practice as outlined above however!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how they would update their records if they were to receive a letter, from your address, stating that, "The Occupier can confirm that he, [or she], does not live here"?

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

I've just had a phone call today from these jokers saying that they have confidential mail for me. It must be for a very old debt as I have behaved myself for the past 6 years. It makes me wonder how they got hold of my mobile number because I hardly advertise it. Obviously not through fair means.

 

Anyway, I hope to start playing with my new friend shortly :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter today from this crowd addressed to "the occupier". They say that they are trying to contact me and as per the data protection act 1998 they are attempting to confirm the data they hold is up to date.

They are part of Empingham with whom I currently have dialogue. There is no reason to contact me since I have never returned mail as not known etc.

Can they in fact legally make that statement about the dpa?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can and will do whatever they want, sending a letter addressed to the 'occupier' is a very clear breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines and is a very clear indication of just how much they really care for legislation and guidelines.

 

Ignore the fools, they have NO legal powers to do anything, send a copy of that childish letter to the OFT&TS along with your complaint.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...