Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

i am wondering if any one can help me this is my first time on this forum. I am trying to sort out a debt my daughter has with Santander from a credit card, she did not tell me about it as she was frightened, i got her to contact Santander and the woman she spoke to just confused her with financial jargon. I spoke with the woman and asked what options she could give her, option 1 agree to pay £170 for 3 months, option 2 do an income and expenditure form which i asked for i also asked for a statement covering the inception of the account to date as my daughter has never had a statement i was informed that she would send me the last 3 months statements. We recieved the income and expenditure form but it is required to reduce payments and we do not want this never recieved any statements, i wanted to get my daughter set up to a regular monthly amount. I wrote back to Santander on her behalf and explained that the income and expenditure form was not what we wanted as she has never recieved a staement i asked for a full breakdown so i could see how this debt has accumulated and agree a plan of repayment. All she recieved were 2 letters a day apart informing here of her arrears and total amount outstanding which is increasing at an alarming rate then 4 days later a letter came from Viking collections asking here to contact them to make full payment or to discuss a payment agreement. I am at a loss at what is the best course of action, because Santander never responded to her letter requesting a stament from inception we dont know what charges are being applied to the account as none are shown in the letters. Should i send a CAA letter to Viking and Santander any help greatly appreciated Geoff

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12 working days from receipt, or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR). I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you intend to send a reconstituted copy of the CCA you must declare the reason why it has been reconstituted and if the original exists and in what form (microfiche) etc.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

Furthermore, with regards to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

You are reminded of the following under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Trading Standards can bring about a prosecution if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under contract, he or she:

 

(a) harasses the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation;

(b) falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it;

© falsely represent themselves to be authorized in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment;

(d) utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character or purporting to have some official character which he knows it has not.

 

I am of the view that your harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Further to this if it is your intention to arrange a call from your 'Doorstep Collectors', I note that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Take note, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or any of your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless. Any trespassers you attempt to send therefore will be dealt with accordingly.Be further advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

(Print in red optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

 

(Print do not sign signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for your help just a quick question the CCA you have sent to me the wording in red should i delete all of this as she has not had any telephone contact yet, also i want a copy statement from the inception of this card so i can see how the debt has accumulated is there another line that i can add and send them a £10 cheque.

 

Thanks Geoff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can omit that, send it to Viking.

 

To get a full breakdown of the charges and the history of the a/c you will need to send a SAR to the Data Controller at Santander; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca this costs £10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi geoffcjb

 

Has you daughter got any Penalty Charges on the Credit Card, also has she been mis-sold PPI on the Credit Card. Both worth checking out and both claimable with interest. You can get at least 6 years worth back.

Statements are fairly easy to get hold of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi geoffcjb

 

Has you daughter got any Penalty Charges on the Credit Card, also has she been mis-sold PPI on the Credit Card. Both worth checking out and both claimable with interest. You can get at least 6 years worth back.

Statements are fairly easy to get hold of.

 

All that will show up with a SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

sent Viking the above letter included a £1 cheque off my dad also wrote to Santander sent them A data protection act letter asking for all information held including all statements sent them a cheque for £10 pound off my dad, received a letter from Santander relating to the Viking letter relating to the CCA on the copy of my letter written in ink CHQ £1. I am positive i did not get the letters mixed up feel like they are trying to mess me around if i did make a mistake and i'm sure i didn't the cheque was made out to Viking no mention of this. I will now have to send the letters again should i reply to the Santander reply to the CCA or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...feel like they are trying to mess me around...

Interesting 'whistleblower' post on another forum that may help explain this... http://www.moneysupermarket.com/community/forums/p/39097/debenhamssantander-cardsviking-collection-service-166329.aspx

 

In the second paragraph it says "We pretend we've already sold it on and call ourselves Viking.". They go on to add things like that "...if we think your lying..." and then "When you call us, be nice" !!!

 

I thought it was a strange, but funny, post by one of their employees anyway... I can't figure out how paying and getting a refund bring the account up to date, but maybe that is how their accounting system works and we should all do that... ;-)

 

Forfot to add - don't believe a word of what a Santander/Viking employee says anyway - the start of the third paragraph sates "All credit agreements under Santander Cards are legally enforcable" and we know that's rubbish!

Edited by hillards
add last para.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

thanks for all your help i have received print outs from a computer screen regarding all transactions on the credit card account it shows transaction date, transaction type, amount and original amount, as this is a print out from a computer screen there is other information that one would have to scrooll left to see they have not sent me this none of the print outs show were atm withdrawls were made. Will i have to send another £10 to request this information or can i request it from the original £10 as they have not sent me all required information held as required under the SAR i sent them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are disputing the debt, they had no right to hand it over to a collection agency and can be reported for doing so. Tell the collection agency to hand it back as you are dispuiteing the debt and if they don't report them to TS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again since my last post my daughter has recieved statements we still dispute, also she has had a debt recovery letter sent to her from Moorcroft debt recovery i sent them a CCA letter, then she recieved a final notice letter from Viking collection service who never responded to the CCA we sent them. Both letters show different outstanding amounts should i write to Viking again and if so what do i write, and just thought i would put this in she closed here Santander bank account months ago and has just recieved a letter from them telling her that her account is overdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...