Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LTSB and defaults


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have poted this on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/200901-anatomy-default-notice-22.html . The advice I have received may be useful for other posters so I am starting a new thread.

Financial meltdown in 2002/3. LTSB send a DN (which I think complies) which I fail to satisfy. About 12 days after date to satisfy a letter from [problem] which states

'this letter, therefore makes formal demand on you to repay the account balance as quoted above' the full amount oustanding. Plus 'our Client has now cancelled your credit card'.

Account then went to MHA and others before we came to a token repayment plan.

Fast forward to 2010 when LTSB seem to be ending all these arrangements, and reverting to adding interest and repaying vast sums. They have now issued a new DN etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a reply from silverfox1961

That shouldn't happen.

 

'If you get a default and clear the arrears before the cut off date then it will be as if the default never happened.

If,however, you get a default followed by termination then the original default stands. You cannot be defaulted for the same debt twice.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is a reply from gh2008

 

'IMHO, when you enter a 'repayment planlink3.gif' there *should* be a new CCA agreement .......

How can the original still be effective when you are not paying the amounts contractually required. (or would they say that the terms was varied - in which case you can reject the new varied term(requiring higher repayments))'

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the same time as this and if your credit file shows a new default under the new regime via Lloyds TSB policy I would be inclided to take it up with both the OFT and the Data Commissioner in as much as a default added so long after the account fell into arrears is not the done thing.

 

Having said that, the ICO are good at muddying the waters, this is a letter sent from them to Experian which sort of excuses Experians own ridiculous behaviour when it comes to data processing and time limits

 

http://www.experian.co.uk/assets/responsibilities/brochures/icoLetter.pdf

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Deb, the credit file is a good idea as several defaults should have cleared by now. If I didn't think it possible I would think that LTSB were being petty and vindictive, however as I know that the government supports them (and their actions) I know that this couldn't be the case.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens ..............

Going through my paperwork I have found the letter that I received in 2008 on this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/162351-new-tactic-lloyds-tsb.html .

There is no new CCA for the 'aarangement' but a variation in the t&cs. Does page 2 on the photobucket letters give them the right to issue a new DN?

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp74/cymru_1/scan0001-1.gif

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp74/cymru_1/scan0002.gif

I think not BUT they will argue this. Any suggestions before I start writing will be gratefully appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that they can issue as many default notices as they like, it's only when they go on from the default and terminate the account by way of a termination letter that no further defaults can be issued.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cancelling a credit card does not mean the account has been terminated but simpy that the card facilities and card itself are no longer of any use.

 

The termination letter would be headed ' Termination Letter' or at least it should be....it doesn't seem as if you've gotten that yet?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked all the paperwork and cannot find a termination letter, but I have a letter from LTSB stating that the account is closed and asking for an I&E. I assume this means that account is still ' open for defaults'. If anyone can concur with this I will look at my next plan of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Going through all my old paperwork I didn't fin d a letter saying termination letter but [problem] did write and request payment of the full amount.

Fast forward to now and [problem] have sent a new letter, another 'formal demand to repay the account balance'. They have recancelled my card, are notifying all the credit agencies and may take court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going through all my old paperwork I didn't fin d a letter saying termination letter but [problem] did write and request payment of the full amount.

Fast forward to now and [problem] have sent a new letter, another 'formal demand to repay the account balance'. They have recancelled my card, are notifying all the credit agencies and may take court action.

 

hi, i had quite a few letters from scm requesting full payment, thier last formal letter stated full balance must be paid in 7 days( or its off to court you go) i sent them a letter back plain and simple , I CAN NOT PAY THE FULL BALANCE IN THE NEXT 7 DAYS OR INDEED THE NEXT 777 DAYS SO PLEASE ISSUE COURT ACTION. the only action i have recived is a letter from the lloyds CDR department..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...