Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax Terminate agreement pass debt to Albion but still add charges to account???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest HeftyHippo

Think you might be getting mixed up with abbreviated call signs BB. I'm not loising the will to fight, but I fight on my terms, and at a time of my choosing. I'm not going to pay nearly a hundred quid to stop people misusing my phone. And as my alleged creditors had my mobile as well, it would only be half a solution. As soon as I stopped taking their calls on the landline, they simply switched to the mobile.

 

A complaint to the ICO stopped them just as soon as I gave them all a new number. Total expense: one SIM ~ £1.50 Tesco, one stamp and letter to ICO, one letter to each creditor giving new number. Total expense a couple of quid and I didn't have to take any calls to blacklist any of them.

 

Of course, there may be some fun in taking the calls and messing them about, and if you want to do that, fine, but it'll never stop as your number will just get passed from one DCA to another, and on it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats the beauty of truecall, it only rings and puts through the numbers I want to talk to so I have no worries answering the phone, as for my mobile as it is a blackberry, it has an app called buzz off,and again is very easy to stop DCA's ringing it.

 

The problem with telling them you will only communicate in writing is that if you ignore their letters, then they will revert back to telephone harassment, so there really isn't any right or wrong way of dealing with their harassment, less goning to your local Police station with a diary of events and making a formal complaint of harassment which should be left in the hands of the Police to deal with.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo

my understanding of Truecall is that you have to program every number you want to block, or every number you want to allow.

 

every time they use a new number, or a new DCA calls, you have to do the same, each time they call, you are disturbed whilst you listen to who is calling and decide to block them.

 

you may be happy to spend money and then time to do that. I am happier to claim ownership of my phone and be proactive.

 

as long as we get the result we want, all is ok.

 

However, if they don't have your number, they can't call, which means you can answer their letters when and if you like, without them resorting to telephone harrasment again.

 

However, phone is their preferred method, and even if you answer their letter, their next call takes place whilst its in the post.

 

I don't get any phone calls from any of them, and I answer letters if and when I like. When my phones ring, I know it isn't from a ******

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

1) IF you do answer the phone ask who's calling and what is it about.

2) Usual B/S answer is It's an "Important Business matter".

3) State - I never take COLD CALLS, I also don't need Double glazing or any other other house improvements and I retired from business a Long time ago so I don't think we have anything else to discuss EVER --thankyou and goodbye.

 

If at 2) they want to ask you security questions just tell them --on what planet do YOU live on --you are calling a private number and asking the recipient(don't ever give your name) for PRIVATE PERSONAL details which could be used for any purposes whatever without you identifying yourselves in any way whatsoever and then just hang up.

 

In answering letters say you WILL NEVER reply to an 0845 number -- YOU guys are demanding the money -- don't expect me to ADD to the costs of phoning one of these types of numbers.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

David, start your own thread and others will come along and advise you, also if that is your real name then you would be well advised to change it trolls scour this site in order to pre-empt your next move, hit the black triangle below, and ask a member of the site team to start a new thread for you if you can't do so yourself, and change your screen name..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...