Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esure contents problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long shot here, I'm realy not upbeat on insurance practaces I just pay them monthly and expect some kind of reasonable service if we ever have a problem. we have put forward a claim due to our main computer being damaged as we have home contents insurance and old for new accedentle damage cover.

 

The claim has been passes to another sub company (TCF) and has been going on for eight weeks now, firstly forms 2 fill out ect then nothing for weeks then we contact them, they ask us to take 2 shop, we send off details ect, we hear nothing again we contact them, now they waint photo's, two months later they are saying our insurance is void as items now quoted in our home are slightly higher than three years ago when we had to list items.

 

the value of claim was approx 900 pounds, and we are covered for 22 thousand, is it possible for them to refuse as therefore we have been paying three years for no cover, please any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse me for being blunt.

 

Your Insurance company or TCF acting for them, have basically called you a liar by putting in a fraudulent claim. This is why they have voided the Insurance and are not paying the claim. Companies will rarely say this in writing, they choose instead to point out some other issue with your Insurance.

 

What you need to do. Contact the Insurance company and make an official complaint. Advise them that you want to urgently refer this matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), so want them to issue their final response urgently. Insurers have up to 8 weeks to issue their final response, but may be prepared to issue this earlier if you pressure them. The Insurers will not want you to go to the FOS as they will be charged a £500 case fee and it will cost you nothing apart from your time, plus phone call or postage.

 

You need to resolve this, as arranging Insurance elsewhere when you have had Insurance voided is more difficult and expensive. When you arrange any Insurance from now on, you have to declare that you have had Insurance voided. If you don't. you risk having Insurance that is not valid. This would be the case for all types of Insurance including your Car Insurance.

 

Please be aware that the FOS will take ages (possible 6 months or more) to deal with your case. If they have conflicting information about the cause of the damage to your computer, they can side with the Insurers, as the Insurers will use people that are expert in putting forward their cases to the FOS. Therefore as an alternative, you could think about using no win no fee specialist claim solicitors to take this to court instead. They will only do this, if they think they can win.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I would certainly be interested in finding out the end result of this.

 

I have just lodged a claim with esure for two lost rings - I have recently lost weight and went swimming in the sea and subsequently lost them due to them falling off my finger.

 

Esure have refferred my claim to "Tcs loss adjusters" which basically means the people they employ to try to pick holes in your claim to stop them having to pay out.

 

I am well and truly pumped up for the battle with these idiots - they picked the wrong person and I will fight them tooth and nail all the way .........

 

POWER TO THE LITTLE PEOPLE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Essex don

 

My prediction is they will try to avoid the claim on the basis that you did not take all reasonable precautions to prevent the loss. If you tell them you had lost weight and the rings were loose, they probably won't pay out. They will say that you should have left the rings at home or the hotels safe etc and not swam in the sea with loose fitting rings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The insurance co would have to prove that you were reckless in your intentions, you may have been silly in your actions (apologies I realy don't mean any offense)and made a mistake, but that doesn't mean you were reckless and somehow knew that this would happen and did nothing to avoid it. Playing carch with the rings in the sea, that would be reckless.

I wouldn't worry about TCF, a lot of companies are using these kind of companies, it saves on staff costs, instead emplying an outside company to ask their questions, nothing that wouldn't or shouldn't be asked in the first instance.

The circumstances are not the most straight forward, but life is that way.

let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update -

 

I have been told my claim has been validated, I was asked to fill in forms for tcs and then another specialist loss adjuster who are "experts" in jewellery losses. ( which translates into experts in picking holes and decreasing the value of the item to save esure money).

 

I have been told that due to the fact that I cannot provide a bank statement with the transaction amount on it ( I paid cash in turkey on holiday) and I do not have pictures of the rings ( I didnt realise that I would need to take pictures of the rings as I didnt think I would ever lose them or need to claim?) ...... that they will pay but only in the form of vouchers for me to redeem here in the uk.

 

My problem is this - I cannot provide what they are asking for and therefore I am being penalised for this?

 

I really want the same rings that I bought in turkey and the jewellery there wont accept my vouchers???

 

Have I got anywhere to go with this? any help would be appreciated.

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your stuck on this as you cant prove the original purchase, thats problem one

 

if the vouchers are for or near your original cost they can argue they have settled fairly

 

they may offer a lower amount than the value of the vouchers as they get discount from their listed jewellers

 

problem 2, you valued the rings @ what they cost you not what a replacement was, by saying they cost £900 etc

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi kiptower,

 

thankss for the advice - however I have proved the original purchase in form of a guarantee certificate for both rings with the amount I paid stated on it.

 

Apart from the problem of the turkish jeweller not accepting these sort of vouchers the rings I had specially made cannot be done for the same price in the uk.

 

Therefore the only way of me buying like for like is by cash - also they valued the rings at what I Paid for them as they were barely a month old when I lost them.

 

Do I have a case for arguing that they settle in cash?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. You don't have any photographs taken when the rings were being worn and visible in the photo, do you by any chance?

 

HB

 

Hi Honeybee,

 

I dont im afraid - which is what they asked for but if I dont have a photo I dont have a photo? I cant just magic one up - and this is one of the reasons they are insisting on vouchers instead of cash.

 

Surley if they validated the claim then they should pay out in cash as its reasonable given the circumstances?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth discussing this with the FOS, as I don't believe they are always happy with Insurers issuing vouchers. Where you have provided certificates of value and cannot obtain the same replacement in the UK, there is a good change the FOS could advise Insurers to make a cash settlement.

 

Sometimes the FOS will intervene on your behalf, without you having to go through with a formal complaint. It is worth a go.

 

This is a link to a previous FOS page on claims settlements, but the FOS will have more information on their stances in this situation.

 

repair, replace or cash? - october

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...