Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Climate change: World's oceans suffer from record-breaking year of heat WWW.BBC.COM Every single day of the past 12 months has seen a new global sea temperature high for the time of year. World's oceans suffer from record-breaking year of heat NOAA Real-time Sea Surface Temperature | EarthNow SPHERE.SSEC.WISC.EDU   Heat Wave in East Africa EARTHOBSERVATORY.NASA.GOV Sweltering temperatures led to power cuts and school closures in South Sudan.   We could be 16 years into a methane-fueled 'termination' event significant enough to end an ice age | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM Methane emissions from tropical wetlands have been soaring since 2006 and accelerating at the same breakneck speed as when Earth's...     There is no way to know what a termination could signify today, given that we are not in an ice age.
    • What was your estimate of the depreciation in value? Frankly it is such a vague measure of your loss then I think that it was a mistake for you to suggest that. What is the value of a free service? What did you actually lose by not having it with you at the time? Where do you normally keep it? Do you think it is now fully repaired or are there some outstanding issues? Have you used it or parked it up in the rain?
    • and didnt Sunak end up trying to claim that defense is best in Tory hands ROFL they cant even get a trident test right, let alone keep the British flag ships maintained and working eh? - and all in full sight of our enemies  
    • Hi all,  Many moons ago (2012)  I had a Virgin credit card (issued by MBNA) that defaulted.  They did provide a valid CCA so I was advised by the good folks on CAG to make small payments to keep them quiet - I set up a standing order to pay them £5 a month, and it's been that way ever since.  The debt has been sold on a million times, but £5 is nothing so I've paid no attention to it.  Anyway, I received a letter from Capquest (who must be the current owners of the debt) back in March asking me to contact them to discuss a suitable repayment option, and the account will now be managed by Resolvecall.  Now £5 a month IS a suitable repayment option so I ignored their letter.  A few days/weeks later, I received a letter from Resolvecall, acting for Capquest wanting me to contact them and threatening a home visit if I ignored their letter.  Obviously I DID ignore their letter, and last week a lady knocked on the door (unanswered) and put a card through asking me to contact Resolvecall. Interestingly, their letter said if I didn't reply within 7 days from the date of the letter, and...you guessed it, there was no date on the letter! Out of curiosity, I logged in to Resolvecall's account, and it shows my two most recent £5 payments, so they ARE receiving my money but clearly want more - which they're not getting.  Now - do I play silly b*ggers with them, and ask them to provide the true copy of the CCA to see if they can come up with the goods? Do I just ignore them and carry on paying my £5? Do I stop paying altogether?  I know the case isn't SB as I've been paying regularly, but not sure how to play going forward?  Any suggestions gang?  Thanks you!   
    • Agreement start date 27/11/15 Amount added from previous loan (before interest was, again, added to it) was, £3441.62
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please - Debt from an estate due to bereavement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I would appreciate some help with the following please:

 

My father passed away last month. Since then I have assumed the role as will executor. On looking at my father accounts I soon reliased that he was actually 40k in debt to 5 credit card companies and 1 business bank account: he was still paying these accounts off but most of them had gone to DCAlink3.gif's. To stop the DCA'S harrassing my mother as the accounts obviously hadnt been paid, I have contacted them all and informed of the death and informed that I am the estate executor. The estate will include an insurance pay out which will obviously be eaten up by the debts which my father had kept hidden. I have gotten myself a solicitor for probatelink3.gif and he has suggested just paying the debts off - something which I will do if they are legal debts (40k is a lot just to write off from my mother inheritence)

 

I have sent an adapted cca request to all of ther oprginal debtors - adapted to say that my father has died, I am the will executor and dealing with the estate and also asking them to write the debt off. These were sent on the 18th May rec delivery. I have only had 2 responses so far - one ackowledging the letter saying that they need to know who is dealing with the will execution (which the letter told them) and another saying they need a signed grant of probate and that i cant have the cca's. They have all had a copy of the death certificiate too.

 

What do I do next with the 2 that have replied and also the ones that haven't.

 

my solicitor just wants to pay them out from the insurance policy - I dont, I want them to prove the debts etc. The credit card appear to be years old - ie mainly 10-15 years old

 

Any advice greatly appreciated as I am in over my head. Any long term advice would also be great ie next steps in different scenarios

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry for your loss and please excuse my bluntness

 

Obviously the solicitor just wants to get it sorted and done as quickly as possible, understandable really, less work for them.

 

As executor, you are under a legal obligation to ensure any claims on the estate are legitimate and lawful. However, there is a part of me which would simply say any demands should be made to the persons named on the agreement and to no other, in other words the debt died along with your father

 

My own opinion would be to follow up on the CCA requests with a proviso that if they are unable to furnish the documentation within the lawfully allowed timescales then the estate will carry no liability to settle a disputed debt (which is what they will become without the CCA being furnished)

 

As the debt was in the name of the fathere, effectively the debt dies when the estate is distributed in line with the will, the debts cannot be transferred to any of the beneficiaries

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a sar to each of the creditors, these will cost £10 each but you can claim this back from the estate. If he had more than one a/c with a creditor one sar covers them all.

 

You should get back copies of agreements, statements showing any PPI or unfair charges you can reclaim. Obviously if any of the agreements are unenforceable they can whistle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. If the estate is insolvent then you should not apply for the Grant of Probate. Let the creditors apply to be the Administrators if they wish to, which they can do. However, make it clear to them that the estate is insolvent. If it is, then you are under no obligation to settle the debts.

 

The debts that come in prioroty are the funeral and legal costs. Other creditors then get to share what's left. If there is nothing in the estate, then the debt cannot be paid. I assume these accounts were not joint with your mother.

 

Do not offer to pay the debts if they were in your father's sole name. Let them apply for the Grant of Representation. I think the legal advice you have received is flawed.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, thanks all for the timely and extremely helpful reponses. just to ellaborate a bit more -

 

The will - names my mother as beneficiary but also says that my dads debt should be paid (the will is c20 years old). So everything goes to my mum alone - no problem.

 

The life insurance (big problem and a real eye opener) - no named beneficiary on the insurance policy so it goes to the estate enabling the debtors to ask for there chunk. however, there would (as its stands) be a suplus for my mother if all debts had to be settled so the estate is not insolvent.

 

- From what I can gather so far - I am right to dispute the debts until the debtors prove otherwise ie cca.

- My next step should be to advise the debtor that as they have failed to provide the will executor with sufficient proof of the acct via the cca request in the agreed timescale then they have invalidated any claims etc

- Possibly send a CCA request to all parties?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you send a SAR, take a look at the ICO website first - it gives a form of words to use in these circumstances which makes clear that you are entitled to submit the request.

 

You don't say whether the DCAs have bought the debts, or if they are just acting for the original creditor. If the former, then you may want to consider, in the fullness of time, and once you are satisfied as to the legitimacy of their claim, making a full and final offer - start at 15%.

 

In the latter case, cut the DCAs out of the loop and deal directly with the original creditor. Almost all financial companies have a department that deals with deceased accounts, and these wil often write debts off; in some cases the collections gang will have try at getting something first, but persistence wins the day.

 

You are quite right to resist the solicitor's blandishments to go down the path of least resistance; he may need to be reminded that he takes instruction from you, not the other way around.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you have the right to verify the debts to ensure they are legit. It would probably be best to discuss this with your solicitor, so you can work together on this. The solicitor will need to provide an account of the estate for probate purposes and these debts will I presume have to be included as a liability. This is probably why the solicitors sees this as a straightforward case of just paying these as they don't want to delay matters.

 

You have to be careful in regard to any joint assets, as creditors can look to your mother for payment.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that it's still an option that the OP posts a notice pursuant to Section 27, Trustee Act 1925 in the London Gazette inviting creditors to enter a claim against the estate.

 

Such a notice places the burden of proof of entitlement upon the claimant.

 

Protection by means of advertisement

27.--

 

  • (1) With a view to the conveyance to or distribution among the persons entitled to any real or personal property, the trustees of a settlement or of a disposition on trust for sale or personal representatives, may give notice by advertisement in the Gazette, and [in a newspaper circulating in the district in which the land is situated] and such other like notices, including notices elsewhere than in England and Wales, as would, in any special case, have been directed by a court of competent jurisdiction in an action for administration, of their intention to make such conveyance or distribution as aforesaid, and requiring any person interested to send to the trustees or personal representatives within the time, not being less than two months, fixed in the notice or, where more than one notice is given, in the last of the notice, particulars of his claim in respect of the property or any part thereof to which the notice relates.
    (2) At the expiration of the time fixed by the notice of trustees or personal representatives may convey or distribute the property or any part thereof to which the notice relates, to or among the persons entitled thereto, having regard only to the claims, whether formal or not, of which the trustees or personal representatives then had notice and shall not, as respects the property so conveyed or distributed, be liable to any person of whose claim the trustees or personal representatives have not had notice at the time of conveyance or distribution; but nothing in this section--
    • (a) prejudices the right of any person to follow the property, or any property representing the same, into the hands of any person, other than a purchaser, who may have received it; or
      (b) frees the trustees or personal representatives from any obligation to make searches or obtain official certificates of search similar to those which an intending purchaser would be advised to make or obtain.

     

 

Link http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/place-notice/personal-legal/deceased-estates

 

 

The DCA will have a defined notice period (2 months I believe) during which to make their claim. Of course not many DCA's probably correlate LG notices against their 'client' database, in the event a creditor did make a claim then they must then prove entitlement which forces them to produce the documentation you seek.

Edited by Jasper1965
  • Haha 1

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this is correct. Creditors must PROVE that the debt exists, and that they're entitled to collect it. You DO NOT have to provide them with a copy of the signed probate. The info you've given them is enough. If they want a copy of the probate, they can get one for themselves. If they want to mess about like the idiots they are, full of their own importance, tell them that if they don't furnish proof of the debt, they won't get anything. I think your solicitor is being a bit previous in telling you to pay without any proof

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, yes the solicitor mentioned paying for this advert to prevent any further claims on the estate for debts i dont know about: I will be doing this definately.

 

Thankfully there are no joint assets or debts - mums house is hers and not dads

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS You can pay yourself out of the estate for things like advertisements in London Gazette and any other reasonable expenses you incur as an executor

  • Haha 1

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that it's still an option that the OP posts a notice pursuant to Section 27, Trustee Act 1925 in the London Gazette inviting creditors to enter a claim against the estate.

 

 

Section 27 won't help. All causes of action subsisting against the deceased at hios death survive against the estate and the PRs stand in the deceased's shoes and so must discharge the debts liabilities. Therefore, the PRs are liable for debts of which he has no notice.

 

However, Section 27 ("statutory advertisements") assists where the debts are not known to the PRs and if so, they can escape liability by advertising in accordance with the s.27 Trustee Act 1925 criteria. Under this provision the PRs "give notice" of their intention to distribute the assets and require any unknown creditors to send particulars of their claim to the PRs within not less than 2 months of the date of the advertised notice.

 

I do not think in this instance any of the debts have not been disclosed to the PRs. However, a s27 notice should be placed because there is a risk of other creditors existing of whom we have no prior knowledge and s27 will have them barred if they don't come forward within the 2 months.

  • Haha 1

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry Buzzman - i am a little confused: does this mean that the only way for them to do anything is to get me in court etc?

 

Depends on the circumstances, and your solicitor should advise you on those. In essence, yes, but it would not be for a CCJ, just an order enforcing the agreement against named parties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in terms of my mother being the beneficiary - would this scenario ulimately impact her credit rating etc do you know if an order was imposed?

 

The order is not "imposed" per se, as far as I understand, the order would only make a third party party to the agreement... Of course if the Termination Notices have been served, the scenario is different - there is no party to attach to a contract that is already terminated, so you really need to discuss this with a solicitor who knows their way around CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is solely in the names of your father then your mother is not liable at all. any liability would be placed on the Executor of the estate until such time as the estate is settled. At no time could your mother be held liable for the sole debts of your father.

 

An order to pay named parties would need to have a damned good reason. ie "we haven't been paid" simply wouldn't be sufficient as long as the estate was discharged correctly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE - 2 months from my original cca requests (and one reminder later) I only have 2 confirmed responses with the required details. I have however, had 2 letters from 2 companies ackowledging the letter and saying that they intend to close the account: what does this mean? will the debts be written off or will they close the account and still chase the money without giving me the information which I requested 2 months ago? What are remifications of a company not gving me the information that I requested 2 months ago etc?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep copies of any letters they may send to you.

 

If they tell you that they are closing the account, effectively they are writing off the account and can enter into no further enforcement action.

 

since effectively the debtor is deceased.

 

Although you as executor have a responsibility to resolve any legitimate liabilities, you would be acting outside of those with a legitimate claim by waiting too long for these "people" who have yet to prove their claim to provide you with evidence of their claims.

 

When you made the CCA requests did you stipulate any timescale or deadline before you "move on"?

 

If you haven't done so yet, I would suggest that you send a letter to each of those who have yet to substantiate their claim reminding them of your request and stipulating such a timescale/deadline.

 

It may be worth taking advice on how long such a timescale/deadline to provide proof and validity of the liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...