Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vehicle on ebay not as described


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, please can somebody give me some advice about a horsebox I bought on ebay? Maybe I am just unlucky and have lost out but please could anyone tell me if i have any come back?

 

I won a horse box on ebay on wednesday which I paid £1802 for. Before viewing the box i asked if the floor had been checked as this is the main thing i am concerned about in terms of the safety of the horses and other road users (it is disastrous when the floors fall out of horseboxes while in use). She replied on ebay that she checked the floor when she bought it and 'its really solid'. To me that meant it is currently really solid. When I viewed the box i asked again about the floor. She told me it was made of wood which concerned me a little and so i looked underneath to see what was supporting the floor and saw that there was metal work underneath supporting it and I asked about the condition of it. I dont remember her exact reply but certainly if id been given any indication anything may be wrong with it i would not have been interested in the box. She also told me a Ford Mechanic had recently looked at the floor and tested it with screwdrivers and that it was fine.

 

The ad stated that there was a bit of rust inside the doors and around the cab etc but it was only superficial. I assumed that meant that was the only rust on the vehicle, and that what rust there was was only superficial.

 

I won the box on ebay and when i took it home, my mum who is a lot less trusting than me, was concerned about the floor and took it to a lorrry mechanic who called her back and told her it was 'rotten as a pear', not worth spending any money on. I think he was referring to the chassis, which is the metal work that provides the floor support i believe. This means the box is absolutely unsafe for transporting horses due to the risk the floor will fall out.

 

Unfortunately I was trusting enough to pay by bank transfer. The ad said cash on collection only, but as i was in a hurry for horse transport and could not get cash in time for when i needed the box, i asked if she would accept a bank transfer.

 

Within a few hours of the bank transfer going into her account, I heard about the mechanics report on the lorry and called her and asked for a refund as the rust is obviously far more wide spread than stated and is deep seated, and the floor therefore unsafe.

 

She apologised and said she had already used the money to pay off a loan, and has since asked what she can do about it since she has spent the money. I have tried politely to resolve the situation with her as she has repeatedly told me she is fair and honest and i therefore assumed she would not want to have sold someone scrap metal for nearly £2000. Maybe she is within her rights, to sell a vehicle in this condition because she says she didnt know. But I would be very grateful if anyone can please tell me if there is any hope of me getting any money back since I believe the ad was misleading, whether or not it was intended to be and i have been sold something totally unfit for the purpose for which it was sold, and worthless.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does what you paid compare to what you normally would be expected to pay for a similar item? (Sorry, I have no idea of how much horseboxes are worth)

 

In any event, I think you're on sticky grounds, you say yourself you had a good look at it, and if it took a mechanic to spot that the thing is actually knackered, you'd have a hard time convincing anyone that she knew about it. If she's a private seller (you haven't said), then fitness for purpose doesn't apply, only that it should be as described. The problem is that you seem to have assumed a few things, instead of making sure before parting with the cash.

 

I think the best thing to do in the circumstances would be to get a quote for the repairs and see if she'll agree to pay part of it, but tbh, you'll have to rely on a lot of good will from her even for that. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, please can somebody give me some advice about a horsebox I bought on ebaylink3.gif? Maybe I am just unlucky and have lost out but please could anyone tell me if i have any come back?

 

I won a horse box on ebay on wednesday which I paid £1802 for. Before viewing the box i asked if the floor had been checked as this is the main thing i am concerned about in terms of the safety of the horses and other road users (it is disastrous when the floors fall out of horseboxes while in use). She replied on ebay that she checked the floor when she bought it and 'its really solid'. To me that meant it is currently really solid. When I viewed the box i asked again about the floor. She told me it was made of wood which concerned me a little and so i looked underneath to see what was supporting the floor and saw that there was metal work underneath supporting it and I asked about the condition of it. I dont remember her exact reply but certainly if id been given any indication anything may be wrong with it i would not have been interested in the box. She also told me a Ford Mechanic had recently looked at the floor and tested it with screwdrivers and that it was fine.

 

The ad stated that there was a bit of rust inside the doors and around the cab etc but it was only superficial. I assumed that meant that was the only rust on the vehicle, and that what rust there was was only superficial.

 

I won the box on ebay and when i took it home, my mum who is a lot less trusting than me, was concerned about the floor and took it to a lorrry mechanic who called her back and told her it was 'rotten as a pear', not worth spending any money on. I think he was referring to the chassis, which is the metal work that provides the floor support i believe. This means the box is absolutely unsafe for transporting horses due to the risk the floor will fall out.

 

Unfortunately I was trusting enough to pay by bank transfer. The ad said cash on collection only, but as i was in a hurry for horse transport and could not get cash in time for when i needed the box, i asked if she would accept a bank transfer.

 

Within a few hours of the bank transfer going into her account, I heard about the mechanics report on the lorry and called her and asked for a refund as the rust is obviously far more wide spread than stated and is deep seated, and the floor therefore unsafe.

 

She apologised and said she had already used the money to pay off a loan, and has since asked what she can do about it since she has spent the money. I have tried politely to resolve the situation with her as she has repeatedly told me she is fair and honest and i therefore assumed she would not want to have sold someone scrap metal for nearly £2000. Maybe she is within her rights, to sell a vehicle in this condition because she says she didnt know. But I would be very grateful if anyone can please tell me if there is any hope of me getting any money back since I believe the ad was misleading, whether or not it was intended to be and i have been sold something totally unfit for the purpose for which it was sold, and worthless.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts from other thread moved here-please stick to 1 thread -it confuses when you have them in other places !

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to put together evidence you have stating that the horse box was in good condition i.e. the advert, emails where you asked about the floor, and perhaps even note down that you verbally asked her when viewing, and seller's response.

 

Put all this in a letter to the seller, along with a copy of the report showing that it's little more than a heap of rust, and unsafe.

 

I would perhaps also get a quote to repair it, or is it beyond repair??

 

Send the letter recorded delivery, and state that the seller has 14 days to refund the money, and could she contact you on XXXX (telephone number) or via email to arrange when you can return the horse box.

 

If she doesn't reply, write again (recorded delivery) entitling it "Letter Before Action", and give her another 14 days to return the money and arrange a suitable date for horse box return, otherwise you will take her to the small claims court.

 

Most people will pay up at this stage...

 

(and if not, small claims court is done online and relatively simple! A colleague of mine used it for a car not as described on ebay, and won!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...