Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Harsh Letter received from Kensington *Claim struck out in court*


jamorgan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5987 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

jamorgan

 

when you write to the Judge if that is what you decide to do if he will not allow you to appeal it would be against your human rights!!! so tell him that, we will back a collective action but as we allready have been told by a Judge that we should be allowed to have the mortgage companies costs assessed we will probally get there befor an action will keep people posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 371
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the idea of getting a transcript of the hearing (if that's possible) might be a good way forward. That way, Morgy can post everything that was said and it would make it easier to write a letter of appeal based on the arguments used in court. If this takes time (and doesn't it always?) maybe apply for an extension which is what the mortgage companies do to give us the run around. Hang on in there Morgy, I'm sure there's much more knowledgeable people than me racking their brains over this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its us again,we have contacted a solicitor who is a specialist in this field and would be happy to carry out a CLASS ACTION.

 

We need all your support though,we need to take these companies on like for like.

 

Please see our thread for your support.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-our-forum/59149-fighting-fund-mortgage-erc.html.

 

We cant do it without you we need all your support and we need to HELP MORGY and any others in same predicament.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow The Avengers - how great are you.

 

Chin up Morgy EVERYONE is well behind you on this one. And I'll happily chip in £20 too.

 

Hope you're felling better about it all today ;)

Halifax 1

WON - £1,355.49 21/07/06

MINT

WON - £273.81 14/09/06

First Direct

WON - £913.50 01/09/06

Capital One

WON - £130.13 03/11/06

Halifax 2

WON - £188.03 01/12/06

 

Kensington Mortgages ERC

MCOL for £6,204.39 Discontinued

Halifax Mortgage Admin fee

WON - £10.00

Direct Line Mortgage Redemption Fee

WON - £99.00

Halifax 3

MCOL for £109.01 reg 07/03/07

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/redemptionfees/

Please sign this petition x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely gutted Morgy

 

Will happily donate £20 for you,don't forget you're not on your own here,and the fight isn't over yet.

 

Chin up

 

Maroon

Halifax Bank plc £1573 settled 19/6/ 06 :D

 

Abbey National PLC

Settled in full £1,754 15/9/06 :grin:

 

Halifax Credit Card £441.63 settled in full 27/10/06 :-)

 

 

Mortgage Express ERP

Pre letter 10/7/06

LBA 27/7/06

MCOL issued 6/9/06

Court Date Feb 06

Lost in court costs awarded £7,500PAYPAL [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy

 

We are getting so much support for this Fighting fund to help you and all of us,we are behind so keep your chin up because if you decide to go for appeal we will make sure you have a Lawyer by your side acting on your behalf .

Please support our fighting fund

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-our-forum/59149-fighting-fund-mortgage-erc.html.

 

x

Lets go get them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goes without saying that I would happily throw £20 into the pot for you too.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy

 

I'm new a new ERC er on site an Kensington is one on my hit list.

 

Just read your thread....literally sobbed for you hun. Wish I could crawl down the wire and hug you. You must feel like you've been run over with a steam roller. The thought of you ..alone... in that alien (gobbledygook)

scarey environment makes me boil.

 

Im definitely in for £20 - just say 'how'..(going to new site next to do it

if I can). Totally behind whatever support - financial or any other - that

can be given you - we ALL owe you bi style - an your welfare is valuable to us all.

 

I think you are a star - an this thread is courageous and moving, as well as hugely informative and inspirational. Thanks so much ....an hang on

in there whilst the support you need rallies.

 

hugs an love

 

lellypea

2006 RatNest - Personal a/c:

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £7,000

 

2006 RatNest - Ltd Co a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £8,000

 

2006 RatNest - Hub's a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim,Sept Settled in full £1,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy,

 

I am still absolutely devasted for you. I believe the decision was wrongly decided, however, much as it pains me to say this I don't think you should appeal.

 

This was strike out hearing and therefore even if the appeal is successful you would still have to have a court hearing to determine the issues. The worst case scenario being you win the appeal and then lose in court hearing. Their costs already are substantial and in the event that it did go to trial, the costs are likely to be 10s of thousands maybe more. I really don't want you to be exposed to such risks.

 

The issues with mortgages are not as clear cut as the bank charges and therefore I believe the risks are too high.

 

I still feel that you had a really strong case and felt I had covered every possible argument. However, I recognise that perhaps I am looking at things too much from the claimant's point of view and may be missing some obvious points, although, from your comments, it seems the judge gave scant observation to your arguments. I am reviewing the mortgage claims with a fine tooth comb in light of this decision.

 

This has been the most difficult post I have ever had to make. Not only because I would truly love to know the outcome of any appeal, but also because Kensington make me so mad. The countless threads on this forum reiterating their evil practices have often brought tears to my eyes. However, I really do not want them or their lawyers to take another penny from you.

 

I am so sorry that I can not be more positive at this time, but I think your best option would be to call it a day. This, however, is your decision.

 

All the very best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, i'm feeling good today.

 

I LOVE you all so very much, you are all a breath of fresh air, and the support and suggestions you have made are mind blowing.

I CAN'T THANK YOU ENOUGHxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

A bit of news for you though

I had a bizarre conversation with someone today.

I rang the court and asked for the section that could help me with regards to the transcript they put me through to a guy and the conversation went something like this:

I was at the court yesterday for a cmc and unfortuanly lost my case,therefore the Judge struck out my claim, then this guy said

"yes I am aware of that mrs Morgan I was there yesterday, I am the clerk " (o great I thought to my self)

I told him that after yesterday I seeked a little legal advice (from my friends) and the first bit of advice given was to obtain a transcript and could he be very kind enough to advise me how to go about doing this

but to my surprise he replied "I am glad you have done that"

well i was bloody gobsmacked

I replied "I didn't do very well yesterday did I" He said I thought you did very very well especially compared to some people who come through these courts, (I nearly started to cry)

 

He then said he would get everything typed up and sent out asap and he would include instructions on how to get the transcript.

Then to my surprise he said to me "just remember what the Judge said to you last going off, try to remember his words he was trying to help you

 

Well the only thing I can think of is

I could appeal and have 14 days in which to do so but I was to personnally appeal to him in wrighting, then the Barristar cherped up and said I think you will find Mrs Morgan has 21 days to appeal to the high court and doesn't actually need to go through you.

 

What's your thought on that guys?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot, yur still my rock my darling.

 

Thanks for your comments I do appreciate them I know how you feel and what you mean makes sense,

Shall we just see what happens in the next few days and decide then

If I decide to appeal do you think you would help me write the letter to the Judge.

and can you advise me on what usually happens when you do write an appeal and what happens next can you give me some info on the procedures

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy,

 

I'll be honest with you and say I'm now getting a little out of my depth. My knowelge of law comes from a lecturing background and not practising law so court procedures are not my strong point.

 

I still feel that your case was wrongly decided but I would prefer that you got a second opinion given the potential risks involved. Your result has made me question my objectivity and whether I was too busy looking for arguments in your favour without being mindful of any arguments against. Having gone back over it I still feel you should have won. However, I don't want to trust my judgment because I am perhaps too closely linked to your case and I certainly wouldn't want you to rely solely on my judgment and make a gamble with such huge sums at stake.

 

I'm not sure what you can make of the comments of the clerk. It could be that by granting the strike out the judge was helping you by saving you costs or it could be that he felt he was constrained by precedent and wanted it to appeal to a higher court. Or it could be the clerk was simply trying to cheer you up.

 

It would certainly be good to get the transcript and it may give you an indication as to whether its worth taking further. I think you need to take independant legal advice before deciding whether or not to proceed. I think you can get an hour free advice under legal aid (not entirely sure if this is still the case).

 

I'll support you whatever decision you make and I know that its a tough one.

 

Take care

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy, Hi Zoot,

I know little about the procedures here, but what if an appeal was made and it was successful? Wouldn't that at the very least mean back to where we were before yesterday's appaling decision? Wouldn't that at least eliminate the costs side of things? I know the case would still be fast tracked but if we could raise the money for the services of a barrister surely it would have a better chance of success? Or am I being naive about this? Let's see what happens with the transcript, there might be something glaringly obvious and wrong (he said hoping!). Also, we may have one last card to play here. A member of my family is a contract lawyer. Its a family thing that we don't tend to hassle her and she's very difficult to get hold of. I've not asked for her advice about my claim at all (and not spoken to her for over a year) but now might be a good time to see if she can offer some pointers. I'll be in touch.

Very best wishes,

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamorgan, you certainly are courageous. I too am just about to commemce my battle to recover at least some of the £16,000 ERC & £14,000 Interest that Kensington snatched from us, when we recently had no option but to sell our home.

 

Your experience actually makes me more determined to go forth in battle with KMC.

 

Despite my endless debts, i would be more than happy to donate £30 (after posting this i shall visit The Avenger's fund thread to see how to donate the money)to any appeal you may wish to mount. KMC are in my view the worse of the bunch, + i am aware of one couple who did recover their ERC from KMC.

 

There are indeed great people on this site & thread, with a wealth of knowledge & i'm sure whatever you decide to do, will be the right decision for your particular situation. Thank you for setting the pace on a risky but principled trek.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DEATHLORD

Well I think the judge was trying to help himself AND Jamorgan. I have been into court more times than I care to rember and there are some D/Js who listen and some that don't. I think you should get a tansprit of the hearing. IF YOU DO NOT APPEAL THIS SETS A PESEDENT so you must write to him, I know there a fund going on, let me know were to send the £100. start off.sub prime lenders know you have no money to defend any cases so thats why they send top guns why was there the need to send two and not just a solicitor, as this should also be a question as to their costs.

so come on lets still go for it

(and we know your watching this site guys!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy

 

Just got in so trying to catch up with all the messages , I think the clerk might have been giving you a hint on what grounds to appeal you need the transcript, but this takes time the nearest for you is Cater walsh Transcription services IC The Court Newport road Cardiff CF 24 1 RH If you ring them on 02920453258 they will give you a quote and you can tell them that you need it before you can decide on an appeal and the time factor it doesnt come cheep mine was half and hour approx and I paid 159.00 you dont need the pleadings just his judgement hope this helps

you can then make an informed choice with the help of zoot and others

Keep your pecker up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgy, I'm glad you are feeling a bit better today. I think the clerk was trying to tell you something - what I don't know. I did think it was odd that the Judge told you if you appealed it was to be to him personally - a bit difficult I would have thought appealing to him about his decision. I do think you need expert legal advice on appeal because I would imagine that any appeal would have to be based on point(s) of law. You do need someone who is "expert" in this field of law and hopefully Paul (above) may be able to help with this family member - even if she can't do it she may well know someone who does. I think realistically you may need to seek Advice from Counsel (barrister)and this may cost you quite a bit - off the top of my head maybe £1000. Perhaps this could come out of the fighting fund. Even if you won your appeal with regard to costs (which may be what the Judge has in mind) it would be worth it. Then wait and see if anyone else has Judgement made before deciding to continue to High Court. I'm in Court 19 Feb against GE Money. It's small claims so no fear of costs. I well understand where zoot is coming frokm she must feel awful but doesn't need to she did her very best. People pay thousands for drafting of legal docs and still lose. Good Luck. Remember we are all with you on this.

 

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deathlord makes soime very valid points above. Why indeed did they send and pay for solicitor and barrister if the decision was so straightforward. Look what it cost them - they stood the chance of losing and were still prepared to pay out thousands. It may be that the Judge wasn't himself sure on the points the barrister raised at the hearing so rather than drop himself in it by finding for you and risk an appeal from Kensington he found in their favour. If you appeal then this gives him more time to go through the evidence and transcript. Just a thought!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jamorgan.

 

Sorry to hear your bad news!!!!

 

Also worried as I am due in court tomorrow in a similar claim against Platform, but guess what.... their solicitors are Drydens, It is Simon Plunkett dealing with it and they too have employed the services of a barrister.... their costs so far are £3091.80.

 

Hope everything works out for you!!!

 

Alan......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dogwash,

 

I could imagine the CEO of KMC sat there banging the table and saying to a barrister "you WILL win this case or else...!!" There is a great deal of truth in what you say though...

 

Like everything in life, you take risks and we all wouldn't be fighting if we didn't believe eh?

 

:D

--------------------------------------------------------------

HSBC

Settled in FULL on 8/8/06 - £3619.53

:D

CAPITAL ONE

Settled in Full on 6/9/06 - £84.76

:D

ABBEY NATIONAL (Old N&P Mortgage)

Settled In Full on 2/3/07 - £307.13

:D

SPML

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

MORTGAGES PLC

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone who is in court and god help us looses ask for the costs to be assessed if not agreed that way they have to list every telephone call letter etc then you can see how unreasonable the costs are and so can the judge assessment costs but if they think their bills are going to be scrunized they quiet often lower them you can also negotiate time to pay

you wouldnt believe what a costed bill can throw up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamorgan

 

In my view I think what the Judge is trying to tell you is the following:

 

You have a case, but you have not come prepared and are not in a position to argue your case against Kensington.(they have obviously used similar arguements in the past and got away with it)

 

Therefore the first round goes to Kensington, all is not lost, because I know you will come back prepared a better fighter.

 

Let Kensington have the upper hand for the moment, and lull them into a false sense of victory.

 

When you have done all the research and found the loophole in the arguements that Kensington seems so victorious about come back and make a case of it so it almost sets a way to future claims for the rest of their victims.

 

One other point to note is that a Judge, will almost always say that you cannot appeal his decision, if he feels there is no chance for further arguements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...