Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Holiday entitlement.


dave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll kick off with a well known one:

 

Regardless of your employment contract, you are entitled to at least 4 weeks paid holiday in the UK.

 

Not sure if this is instant, or if you would be bound by a probabation period.

 

(Stephen could probably tell us more ;-) )

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would depend on what period the company use for acruing holiday entitlement. If it is from January to December, and you started work on 1st April, then you would only be entitled to three-quarters of the holiday in that year ie 3 weeks.

 

Also remember that if you were to take the three weeks holiday, and then left the company on 31st September, the company would be entitled to reclaim one week of the holiday pay back, as you would only have worked for them for six months.

 

Other factors do come into play with part-time and shift workers etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite right - the holiday entitlement would be pro-rataed.

 

My partners sisters boyfriend, had a job where he was paid for only 3 days holiday regardless of the % of the year he'd been there.

 

He wasn't aware that they legally had to pay him for 4 weeks.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - not as a contractor. Sorry.

 

As an employee of the firm you would be entitled.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

European legislation came in some years ago now. All part-time workers, temps, contractors etc., are entitled to paid holiday just the same as full time employed people.

 

Try this link:

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/life/employment/holidays_and_holiday_pay.htm#who_has_the_right_to_paid_holidays

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey!! You learn something every day.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey!! You learn something every day.

 

I have to admit that these changes crept in from Europe without much publicity. At the time I was working in a Human Resources office, so had to deal with it at the front line, so to speak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....are you saying I'm entitled to paid holiday as a contractor?

 

As a contractor, you are just there to be bled dry by the inland revenue who want to treat you as an employee (IR35). However, it seems we do not get any of the perks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Am I understanding this correctly..

I work as a job sharer for a large airline company.. I work 10 days a month on a 2on 4off roster I have worked for the same company for nearly 10yrs and i receive 16.5 days off a year is this ok? As we are shift workers we are contracted to work all public holidays,xmas etc

just wondering if i have a good deal or am entitled to any more..

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ran an recruitment agency with loads of temps who all now get holiday pay entitlement. It's a good thing for temps as they often went from one job to another and never took a break and often their rate did not reflect the equivelant of permanent staff. However, contractors as they like to be called with their Limited Companies faired alot better with thier reduced tax & NI and higher charges - I don't feel too sorry for Ltd Company contractors I'm affraid, they in the main do very nicely thank you and shouldn't complain too much on a site like this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a HR Advisor - I thought I'd just say that this 4 weeks does not mean 28 days. It means 4 working weeks. 20 Days. Also it is perfectly legal (although terribly bad practice) for companies to include 8 Bank Holidays a year in this figure. I am so lucky, I get 35 days holiday plus Bank Holidays a year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remember that if you were to take the three weeks holiday, and then left the company on 31st September, the company would be entitled to reclaim one week of the holiday pay back, as you would only have worked for them for six months.

 

Alanfromderby, i beg to differ here, if you do take 3 weeks paid holiday (but have only accrued say 1 week) the employer cannot reclaim the holiday pay from your final wages as this would be seen as an unlawful deduction from wages, the fact that they have paid you for something you are not entitled to is their problem and they have no legal recourse for getting the money back - if they did unlawfully take this from final wages then you would have a case at an industrial tribunal and you would win, but of course ACAS would tell the employer this before it got to a tribunal and advise them to pay up or else !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remember that is you are on Statutory Maternity Leave, your holiday entitlement must accrue at the same rate as if you were still working at the place of work. I used to be a temp and got 20 days, 8 of which were bank hols so technically got 12 days holiday a year and kind of accrued them as I went along.

 

They tried to tell me they didn't accrue on Maternity Leave, I gave them the DTi Maternity Rights booklet with the paragrapgh highlighted, it seems they had done it to other people and owed them £100's!

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, does anyone know what I would be entitled to if anything.

I work in an Afterschool club 3pm - 6pm 32 weeks a year (term time) The rest of the time during the holidays my work is unpredictable, One holiday I could work the whole holidays 5 days a week 10hour days. But these hols (easter half term) there is know work for me so therefore no pay either.

I have asked my employer on many occasions what my entitlement is but still after almost 2 years I do not have an answer.

I was paid for 1 weeks holiday last year, and I was given a £200 xmas bonus (which when i asked about holiday pay was told that was covered in the bonus, so was it a bonus or holiday pay?)

I liek my job as it suits my circumstances at the moment but can't help but feel a bit let down.

vicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alanfromderby, i beg to differ here, if you do take 3 weeks paid holiday (but have only accrued say 1 week) the employer cannot reclaim the holiday pay from your final wages as this would be seen as an unlawful deduction from wages, the fact that they have paid you for something you are not entitled to is their problem and they have no legal recourse for getting the money back - if they did unlawfully take this from final wages then you would have a case at an industrial tribunal and you would win, but of course ACAS would tell the employer this before it got to a tribunal and advise them to pay up or else !!

 

 

I agree that this is not as clear-cut as I suggested. However, most companies do have a clause about it within their Contracts of Employment, and where it is stated that unaccrued leave has to be repaid then that is the case.

 

Employees without a CofE, or where their contract does not have such a clause then they cannot be made to repay.

 

This is taken from the ACAS website:

 

What happens when a worker has taken more leave than their entitlement on termination of employment?

Regulation 14 (4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 states that an employer and worker can draw up a 'relevant agreement'( for example, in the contract of employment) to provide that a worker will compensate the employer, whether by payment, undertaking additional work or otherwise if leave already taken is in excess of entitlement when employment ends.

 

There should be a 'relevant agreement' in place; if not, and a deduction of overpayment is made by the employer from the worker's final wage payment, the worker may have the right to submit a claim to an employment tribunal under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 - the right not to suffer unauthorised deductions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about if you work 5 days one week and 6 days the other alternate weeks.

 

if you are entitled to 4 paid weeks and the employer only gives 20 days paid holiday are they conning workers out a days holiday pay here?.

 

only 1 day i know but rather my days holiday than being at work

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone.

 

Just to pose a question:

I have been on long term sick and and the company have clawed back some money from me.I am in full time employment and I get 30 days per year which is 2.5 per month.

 

They have taken back pro-rata and i was just wondering that as i have a contract with the company which gives me these days per year, am i entitled to the holidays as in payment for these when i am not there or do i have to be at work to `earn` this entitlement.

 

Have been with this company for 5 years and never thought of questioning losing entitlement through sickness.

DPA Letter sent 28 Feb

  • Statements Received 24 Mar
  • Prelim sent 24 Mar
  • LBA sent 12 Apr
  • MCOL 26 Apr
  • Acknowledged 3 May
  • Coming soon:

£2810 inc int. Halifax. Done and Dusted 16/05/06

Dont forget to donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that you are entitled to accrue holiday pay whilst on long-term sickness, provided that it is only part of the year that you are ill. If you are absent for the whole year - then you cannot claim back pay in lieu of holiday entitlement.

 

If in doubt ring ACAS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alot, that is a good answer. Accrue was the word I was looking for.

 

I was just chancing my arm would have been a bit cheeky to ask for something for nothing.

 

Dont buy a raffle ticket. Dont win a prize.

 

Thanks.

DPA Letter sent 28 Feb

  • Statements Received 24 Mar
  • Prelim sent 24 Mar
  • LBA sent 12 Apr
  • MCOL 26 Apr
  • Acknowledged 3 May
  • Coming soon:

£2810 inc int. Halifax. Done and Dusted 16/05/06

Dont forget to donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can someone please advise me,

 

I started working for a company on 1 February and our holiday period started 1 April. My contract states that 'You are entitled to 1 and half days holiday per calander month'. I know from asking around that we can carry holidays forward, but only a maximum of 5 days.

 

Does anyone know of a time limit to carrying them forward? Contract has no information on time.

 

eg, I took no holidays until April, so would I still be entitled to carry forward the 3 days I was entitled to from Feb - March?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please advise me,

 

I started working for a company on 1 February and our holiday period started 1 April. My contract states that 'You are entitled to 1 and half days holiday per calander month'. I know from asking around that we can carry holidays forward, but only a maximum of 5 days.

 

Does anyone know of a time limit to carrying them forward? Contract has no information on time.

 

eg, I took no holidays until April, so would I still be entitled to carry forward the 3 days I was entitled to from Feb - March?

 

Hi Tucool,

 

Going by what you say, then yes you would be entitled to carry them forward, but when you have to use them by is entirely up to your company. My OHs holiday year is Jan to Dec, and can carry forward 5 days, but these have to be used by the end of March, else he loses them. Where as I work for a company that don't allow any hols ot be carried forward at all.

 

It should all be in your contract, but if in any doubt, speak to your line manager or HR.

 

Suzie x

The world is divided into 10 types of people - those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...