Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road after coming off the motor way, i noticed my car felt a little "weird" i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intolerant on date night, we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i haven't received anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. Should i query the ticket as i don't want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep quiet. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accused of 'fronting'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I wonder if anyone can give any advice.

I have recently informed my insurer of an incident whereby my son drove into the back of another vehicle at a roundabout. The speed was slow (edging forward only) and relatively minor damage to the other vehicle. Upon speaking to the insurer they have informed me that because the V5 was in my sons name and the policy lists me as main driver that the insurance policy may be void.

Bit of background history-

My son bought a car on HP but only ever made two payments and I have paid ever since (for approx 2 years). He hardly uses the car as he has a lift to work and uses the car once in a blue moon. I am the main driver and insured the car as so. Reason for not updating the V5 was because I (stupidly) thought that because the car is still being paid off on HP that I couldnt. I know this sounds really niave but it is a genuine mistake. Do I have a leg to stand on when it comes to trying to fight this if the policy is made void. Son is the registered keeper (according to V5) but it does say on there that the registered keeper is not necessarily the legal owner. If I am paying for the car now and I also pay the insurance and am the main driver/user can I legally argue that I am the 'owner'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually insurers ask on the proposal 'Are you the registered keeper and owner of the vehicle', if they asked that and you replied 'Yes' then it does look like a case of fronting.

 

(It is worth remebering that the registered keeper isn't necessarily the owner which is why the question is phrased as above)

 

Can you remember if you were asked that, and also what you replied?

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the policy also benefitting from any NCD? as this is what the insurers will be looking at, V5 in sons name, who pays for the policy,if DD whos account is it,Main user etc. Policy taken out online or phone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly cannot remember if they asked this question or not but I wouldnt have lied to them so I'm guessing not? I've had the policy over two years now and it's always been in my name as I really AM the main driver. The policy is paid for in monthly instalments and is paid by direct debit from my own account (account is in my name only as well).

Yes it benefits from my NCD as I was insured on a different car prior to this one (and I no longer own the other car and nor did I own it when I started to drive this one)

I feel physically sick..... How does one defend the 'assumption' of fronting when it genuinely isnt :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. You don't have a copy of what you said, I guess. There is a question earlier about whether you bought online or over the phone, which would be the basis of this policy.

 

I don't know if you can find or ask for a copy of your original answers?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does seem a difficult one, as they would have a copy of the original conversation and if anything was incorect as in document, they will probably use that.

 

Hi honey bee thats quick :) Yep good idea to ask for copy of what said

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys

just checked my policy and it says I am the registered owner and keeper :eek:

 

And that's the problem.

 

You were asked at the proposal stage if you were the registered keeper and owner (just about every single motor insurer asks that) and you answered that you were, and on that basis the insurer accepted the risk and calculated a premium.

 

Insurance is based on utmost good faith, which isn't present here, you told them something that was incorrect, and fronting is something insurers will not accept.

 

They hold all the cards now, any complaint to FOS would be dismissed, your only option is to contact them and ask them if they will consider dealing with it and explain it was a genuine mistake. If they decide to void the policy (which is quite likely) then you don't really have an argument or anywhere else to go to/complain to.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly all points to a fronted policy, HP in sons name and he is the registered owner.

 

Might need to go a bit deeper to defend your position. For instance do you commute to work in it and have a parking permit for work?

 

At the end of the day it will be down to the discretion of the insurer, but other peoples dishonesty has made them pretty firm on their stance over this.

 

Good luck with it, but get it sorted for the future in case of a more serious incident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...