Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Little old me V HSBC - Claim form now received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just had a lovely letter through the post from metropolitan onthe lines of we're disappointed etc etc and we will take you to court and get an attachment of earnings etc... Can someone just take a peek at my cca stuff so i can decide what to do please!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the Default Notice is defective. The date between the notice and the rectification date is 14 days, no time allowed for service.

 

Have they asked for the ballance in full yet or sent a letter terminating the agreement?

 

Vint

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may want to send them this.

 

I refer to your Default Notice dated xxxxxxx, received by me on xxxxxxand your subsequent letter terminating the agreement by demanding the balance in full, dated xxxxx, received xxxxxxxxxx, in which you confirm that you had in fact terminated the above agreement by demanding the balance in full.

The default notice failed to give me the required statutory time in which to seek legal advice and/or remedy any alleged defect. Your actions resulted in insufficient time for me to even obtain an appointment with a solicitor let alone remedy the alleged default. These actions by you, have resulted in you unlawfully rescinding the alleged agreement.

 

I accept your unlawful rescission of the agreement and I note that you are now entitled to claim those arrears genuinely due at the time of the termination (not including any unlawful charges ) and I would be obliged if you would advise me of the exact amount of those arrears, against which will be a claim for unlawful rescission

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks vint!!! i have already sent that letter back in April!!!! And yes they did ask for payment in full... (sent letter of repu after that on advice from babybear and broooce, thanks to them...) just wondering about the cca? is it cosher so-to-speak and what can they actually try and get out of me now the full 9k or the 800 pounds that was added at the time of their full payment demand? cos metropolitan seems to want the full amount? So can you advise me on what i can do next?? Thanks in advance....

 

 

Oh! i should add they never acknowledged that letter but did send it recorded lol...

Edited by bilious
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask something as well?

 

I also received the dodgy DN form friend HSBC and they demanded the full amount, therefore terminating the agreement.

 

What should I do?

 

Acknowledge the termination.

Then send the letter of Unlaw full Rescission.

 

OR

 

Do I simply send the letter of Unlaw full Rescission.

 

Thanks

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for it BabyBear. Thought so but I needed that confirmation.

 

I have read many thread and read and re-read the CCA and I agree with that fact that should you have been served with an invalid DN and they unlawfully terminate the agreement, then under section 87(1) of CCA they will not be able to collect the amount left after the deduction of the arrears.

 

Can someone please elaborate more on it because I have a heated discussion with a debt elimination company which I want to send to h***. They argue that this is not the case. Have to admit, it did sow some doubt!

 

If I send of the termination acceptance letter recorded, how long should I wait until I fire of the UR letter?Thanks for it BabyBear. Thought so but I needed that confirmation.

 

I have read many thread and read and re-read the CCA and I agree with that fact that should you have been served with an invalid DN and they unlawfully terminate the agreement, then under section 87(1) of CCA they will not be able to collect the amount left after the deduction of the arrears.

 

Can someone please elaborate more on it because I have a heated discussion with a debt elimination company which I want to send to h***. They argue that this is not the case. Have to admit, it did sow some doubt!

 

If I send of the termination acceptance letter recorded, how long should I wait until I fire of the UR letter?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that mean i've done it wrong then? i was told to fire off the acceptance of the termination with the unlawful rescission. as one!! Can someone elaborate please? And is there anything i do to tell metropolitan about this as they're demanding the full amount???

 

Thanks in advance..

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO them receiving the TN will terminate the agreement of the date when they receive it. If they receive the letter of unlawful rescission on the same date, it means that they did receive it when the account terminated and it should be OK.

 

Expert advice will be helpful.

 

I think that sending them a few days apart will ensure that they cannot try to argue that receiving the unlawful rescission om the same day makes it invalid. It is just an attemp to ensure there is no doubt.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sort of understand that lol... and what about the in house dca metropolitan what do i say to them? Do i point out that i have sent the above letter etc or wait for the next set of empty threats.... unless it's going to dg solicitors which they've already threatened...

Edited by bilious
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember they didn't go to DG Solicotors, they "buy" these letters online. I visited a solicitor one day (had to sort out my landlord) and saw their advertisement:

 

"Free Solicitors 7 Day letter before action"

 

Here is the link, you and me can send it someone as well!

Solicitors 7 Day letter before action -Debt collection Solicitors-Salisbury,Andover,Wiltshire,Hampshire,Dorset 

 

They claim that 71% of people after receiving this letter.

 

I investigated the same type of letter from another DCA and saw they have to pay 79p for a letter! I also followed the link to solicitors t&c's where they clearly states that should they decided to actually start litigation, they have to remember that the courts very seldom reward all cost to them, they will probable end up with paying, even when successful.

 

These letter are just another empty treat which is safe to ignore!!

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry not:

They claim that 71% of people after receiving this letter.

 

but

 

They claim that 71% of people do pay after receiving this letter.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lord tiger putin :)

 

It maybe that you are not aware that Metro are HSBCs In-house DCA they don't work for anyone else , like DG Solicitors , they're the heavy mob ......use HSBCs database etc ...

 

Just thought that might help .............:)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, I know about metro. I did send the UR to HSBC today for their faulty DN and did receive letters from DG Solicitors on the 15th of June.

 

How should I handle the letters from DG Solicitors?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just found this document on the internet:

http://www.tpuc.org/forum/download/file.php?id=703&sid=9de89f1f4992d1e2ed6dc20a536aff33

DG Solicitors explaining to potential customers their services, especially where there are reason for dispute.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hee hee .....sounds to me like DG Sols are moonlighting .....

 

as for DG , I'd send them a copy of the UR letter you sent HSBC and tell them it's a matter which is 'In Dispute' at the moment ....... awaiting a reply from HSBC .....

 

You could be cheeky and invite their comments/advice on where to go from here.. (given their waffle on the above link ........ ):rolleyes:

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also going to fire of my claim back on PPI. This alone will also put the account in dispute, am I correct?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say so LTP ..... because it clouds the issue of precisely how much you owe them.... or they owe you ?

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it gets better, the DN was invalid. I had just started to look at the PPI. The amount of PPI I paid plus interest could be very close or even more than the amount of the arrears on the DN! This means that when the DN was issues, I was actually not in arrears! I assume this is correct.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically ,that is correct , if PPI refund is upheld .........

 

They could argue of course , that , because PPI had not been challenged at the time the DN was issued (or was it ?) ....... that they were correct at the time ..... however, I think it could probably be withdrawn retrospectively ...

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i really should look at the ppi i paid them for nearly six years then? as i've said dg aren't involved just yet, but as soon as they are then should i send off the same letter to them and asking for the amount as the account went into dispute?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look on the PPI forum on here bilious , there are a lot of knowledgeable people on there who will give you good advice ....... first on whether you have a claim for mis-selling and second , how to go about reclaiming it ........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/

 

It also puts your account in further dispute , so you shouldn't be chased for a debt ... but you will be ... 'cos they're like that .... and they get away with flaunting the DCA rules .....

 

But if you hold out against them , they usually back off a bit ......

  • Haha 1

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry bilious, it seems that I hijacked you thread, but I assume what I learn is also helpful to you..:)

 

I do not know whether the PPI were claimed at that stage, was with a stupid DMP which I am in the process of sending a SAR to try to establish it but I am not holding my breath..

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a SAR to HSBC and they said a nice layout of the PPI!

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...