Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

THE Election - Made your mind up yet ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

by Bookworm:

 

"However, all in all, when making up my mind, I find generally that I agree more with Labour than with the other parties and that in turn leads to my choice when voting."

 

And that of course, is your choice.

 

What a fuss about an omlette...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's true that newspapers (and tv news) slants what they print in the direction 'they' want to go and not how it is by only picking on the bits 'they' want you to hear.

 

If there was a tax cut and a tax rise, you can bet that the Mail would emphasise the rise and the Sun the cut. You have to hear the full story and make the decisions yourself.

 

Agree, that is why I take a cross section of papers, in order (hopefully) to gain a more balanced view.

 

And no, I do not believe everything I read in the papers. But, without the media in general we would all be back in the days of, could/should I say; ignorance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's move on, the following will I think be of interest:

BBC News - Nick Clegg says cuts move 'painful but necessary'

 

:

The deputy prime minister also launched a fierce attack on what he said was "careless" spending by Labour in its final months, saying they made "extraordinary commitments...which they knew they could not honour".

Link to post
Share on other sites

”The Treaty of Lisbon is the same as the rejected constitution. Only the format has been changed to avoid referendums.”

 

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing,

former French President and President of the Constitutional Convention. 27 October 2007

 

Ever been conned?

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

”The Treaty of Lisbon is the same as the rejected constitution. Only the format has been changed to avoid referendums.”

 

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing,

former French President and President of the Constitutional Convention. 27 October 2007

 

Ever been conned?

Ever seen a bitter old man, angry at seeing what he saw as his masterpiece and guaranteed entry in history books being thrown in the bin, then spitting and finger pointing at its replacement? :rolleyes:
Link to post
Share on other sites

”The Treaty of Lisbon is the same as the rejected constitution. Only the format has been changed to avoid referendums.”

 

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing,

former French President and President of the Constitutional Convention. 27 October 2007

 

Ever been conned?

 

The British Public were conned by Blair & Brown.

 

Fred, I cannot comment on the Falkland War fully, (CagBot will come along) other than UK territory was invaded;

Mrs. Thatcher did us Proud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's move on, the following will I think be of interest:

BBC News - Nick Clegg says cuts move 'painful but necessary'

 

:

The deputy prime minister also launched a fierce attack on what he said was "careless" spending by Labour in its final months, saying they made "extraordinary commitments...which they knew they could not honour".

ah yes, saw that. A cynic might say that they are setting themselves up in such a manner that if they manage to heal the economy (unlikely), they will then be able to crow it from the rooftops, whilst if they fail (likely), they can say "well, we tried our best, but things were soooo bad when we got here, what did you expect?".

 

Of course, this way, they can justify the most outrageous cuts by saying that it's all the fault of the previous incumbents, nothing to do with us, guv, honest.

 

On this note, we have only one dongle between all of us, as VM modem has crashed and I must let my son have a turn, so I bid you all good day, hopefully back later when he is in bed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The British Public were conned by Blair & Brown.

 

Fred, I cannot comment on the Falkland War fully, (CagBot will come along) other than UK territory was invaded;

Mrs. Thatcher did us Proud.

Oh dear lord. I can not comment fully on THAT or CAGbot will be along. :oops:
Link to post
Share on other sites

The way things are going, the Euro and with the the EU as we know it may well be going down the tubes. If that happens it won't be an issue any longer. What's interesting is that almost every time people have been given a chance to vote on matters European they have rejected it. First time round anyway. What then happens is that they are told to vote again on this time "get the answer right".

 

The whole European project is undemocratic.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Which is actually the way it is and a very fair comment.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrs. Thatcher did us Proud.

 

She certainly did.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can afford almost £10 a week to fritter away on toilet paper? :eek::rolleyes:

 

You can afford omelettes? :eek::rolleyes:

 

I have no love for Tony Blair either. Personally, I thought he was a grinning idiot :D But he was better than what came before ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot be serious Fred and AC? :eek:

 

Margaret Thatcher did more to ruin the economy and infastructure than any other politician in history!

 

You both were obviously not caught up in the holocaust of heavy industry, utilities and public services.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Which is actually the way it is and a very fair comment.

 

But, didn't Brown do exactly the same and for 13 years?

Brown, constantly referred back; 13 years about what the Tories did wrong!

 

Government to spend its way out of credit crunch

October 21st, 2008

UK Prime minister or (Sub Prime minister as he was called this week), Gordon Brown and his bushy eyebrowed sidekick the UK Chancellor Alistair Darling are to bring forward projects and spend the UK out of recession, they are planning to build more roads, schools and hospitals to get the UK Economy back on track.

 

Although the UK’s national debt is way over target at 37 Billion Pounds, Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling think the way forward is with yet more borrowing so they can get the economy moving, they argue that spending the money by bringing planned projects forward will boost the economy and if they don’t spend it the effects of the credit crunch will be even worse.

 

The Labour Party; spend. spend, spend has proven to be disasterous: IRRESPONSIBLE SPENDING!!!

 

 

Brown, sold the countries GOLD to China, when Chancellor?

GOLD is now at a record high!

Estimated loss to the TaxPayer: £7Billion; [Emphasis Estimated]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrs. Thatcher did us Proud.

 

She certainly did.

 

 

Big high five for AC and FB. At least there was 2 people she did proud. I thought there was less.:cool:

 

Slaggy Maggie. Just 2 minutes in an empty room with her please..

No wait.....1 will do. (and that is not for sexual pleasure):D.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big high five for AC and FB. At least there was 2 people she did proud. I thought there was less.:cool:

 

Slaggy Maggie. Just 2 minutes in an empty room with her please..

No wait.....1 will do. (and that is not for sexual pleasure):D.

 

I think there may have been more than 2, hence the fact she won 3 elections on the bounce, the last 2 with massive majorities - then Major went on to win a 4th.

 

Blair won 3 as well, I know, but Gordon was unable to to the same. I think Tony got out at the right time. I think the point is here that people simply get fed up of having the same mob in time after time which is why 'time for a change' or 'things can only get better' seem to resonate so well with people.

 

It will very interesting to see how this lot get on. Looking at some of the views on here, after only 2 weeks some opinions are already entrenched even for self-proclaimed intellectuals and free thinkers.

 

I can't say I'm over excited at what we've got - let's face it nobody voted for a coalition. Whoever had won though, we would all suffer for the mess Labour left behind eventually.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But, didn't Brown do exactly the same and for 13 years?

Brown, constantly referred back; 13 years about what the Tories did wrong!

 

the difference, as I have pointed out many a time, is that the previous recession was (wo)man-made and very much of the Tories' doing. This one is global, caused by economic liberalism, greed and fraudulent behaviours pushed by the very people who vote for the Republicans/Tories/right wing parties.

Looking at some of the views on here, after only 2 weeks some opinions are already entrenched even for self-proclaimed intellectuals and free thinkers.

Oh dear. Where did anyone call themselves intellectuals? Being able to think for oneself doesn't make one an intellectual, Fred. You should try it sometimes. :razz:

and I shall tell you, AGAIN, that my ideas are no entrenched after 2 weeks. My FEARS were there before that lot got in, and my FEARS are that I will be right. If I am wrong, I am no masochist, I would be absolutely delighted if we don't get an increase in VAT to about 20%, I would be delirious with joy if the vulnerable in society don't get to jump through further hoops to get the minimum they're entitled to, if the "tax on jobs" so decried by the new lot were to get overturned and no just kept on AS WELL as the VAT rise... Of course I would! I would love it if the goods bits in the manifesto hadn't been thrown out when the coalition agreement came in, if we were going to be protected from further rises in fuel as promised before the election, etc, etc...

 

I would love it. Until I see it happening, I just don't believe it. not any more that I believe that troops will get pulled out of where they don't belong any time soon. I wonder who you will blame then as the bodies keep on piling up. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS: according to a newspaper article I saw earlier, the plans for our future were leaked, and in it is this: IB claimants to be assessed for work and if deemed to be fit for work (by whom, one wonders, the spectacularly awful ATOS?), then they'll be downgraded to JSA.

 

Now since it was in the papers, I am hoping that this is just spin and will wait until I read the actual documents myself to decide, but IF it is true... for shame, Condems, for deep shame. :-(

 

Let's hope it's not true, hey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't wait for Bookie to start the "I TOLD YOU SO" thread.

 

I am positive it will happen.

 

I (unfortunately) have to go to ATOS myself first thing in the morning:(. But that's another thread.

 

I am breathing, so obviously I am fit for work!

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder who you will blame then as the bodies keep on piling up. :-(

 

Blair.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...