Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

cabot/restons Claimform - Vanquis Debt***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2426 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi GM

thanks again,

of course you have showed me the light,

All their normal letters etc on one filling system and all of their payments/credits /charges etc should be on another one.

so i shall try getting that again from both the OC and The DCA.

ta again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

There's absolutely nothing wrong with them adding interest and charges to an account despite you believing that there is a 'dispute'. Can I ask what makes you think that they can't do this?

 

Evidence that they have the right? Cabot have never attempted to add interest/charges to one of mine because to date (3 years) they've been unable to substantiate any legal right to collect on it it; no CCA.

 

hi All

Well this is what i have just had back from Cabot

Any thoughts anyone.???

 

In other words, we believe the OC and not you and as such, the account is not in dispute and if you don't challenge this with us, we might issue couort papers (IMO)...[/b]

 

As you are already aware, a SAR is made in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 ("DPA") and as such, Vanquis' legal obligation under the DPA is to provide you with all information they hold on their files and relevant filing systems. Therefore, with regards to your comments relating to documentation that was missing from your SAR, if this information was not held on file, then there would be no requirement to include this in your SAR. In light of this, should you remain disatisfied with the informaiton that Vanquis has provided regarding your account, I would request that you refer this matter to them directly. Correct in that you need to take up your issue with Vanquis re. lack of SAR info.

 

In addition, I note your SAR to Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd ("Cabot"). However, in order for us to proceed, we require a payment of £10.00, which is the statutory fee for this request. Therefore, please forward your cheque or Postal Order made payable to Cabot in order for us to continue and upon receipt of the same, we would be happy to supply you with the information that you have requested. However, I must reiterate that should Cabot not hold a copy of your credit agreement or terms and conditions on file, then this information would not be included in your SAR. Furthermore, Cabot does not hold details of any Payment Protection Insurance ("PPI") on file, as we are not the original PPI administrator. Therefore, we recommend you specifically request the same from Vanquis, should you still require this information.

]

 

Don't bother with a SAR to Cabot.... it's a waste of £10, IMO. If you're enquiring about charges/interest, then this info. would have been with the OC before the account was sold. Is there more in charges..... or is there more outstanding minus those charges? If it's the former, pursue the OC. If it's the latter, deal with Cabot.

 

My experience of Cabot wasn't a bad one but I did find them slippery, so in order to catch them on the back foot over this, send an additional CCA request to Cabot by rec. delivery. Although this isn't strictly necessary, I found that it shoots a nice hole in one of their particular arguments because the onus of proof is now directly with them and they have to deal with it, with less room for games. See what they send back (if anything) and if in doubt over what they send, go down the CPUTR route for confirmation.

 

One step at a time though....

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi there,

One question, well 2 Actually

as an Original Creditor (Vanquis) has failed to supply complete paperwork on a DSAR is it possible to file a N1 claim to get them to give the paperwork?

if it is possible, what would be the best way to word the claim?

 

all help appreciated with great-full thanks,

 

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly is, did it recently with a catalogue company - its called an Order under Section 7 and Section 15(2) of the Data Protection Act 1998, found all my information from the main forum - Data Protection Issues, I think the thread was Fedupand fighting back's and entitled Them and Me, cost £30, if you have any problems locating, let me know, a bit tired tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is difficult to answer as you have given so few details.

 

As with most things - it depends.

 

It largely depends on what you specifically asked for and what they actually provided.

 

Although please be aware that with a SAR you have no right whatsoever to see any original documents. The data controller may choose to provide them to you but they don't have to. They can just provide the information that is contained on these documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicklea

When I sent the DSAR I asked for, Original Signed credit agreement, T&Cs for when the account was opened, the signed application form, and full transaction History, with a breakdown of all charges and PPI payments that where added.

 

got partial account history but not in an understandable form, no T&Cs only the latest as of 2010, no agreement no signed application just a copy of a blank one (which didnt mention PPI) so the bits i wanted i never actually got.

wrote and asked for the missing info and got told, we have complied with your request.

 

hope that sheds a bit more light on the subject for you.

 

 

ta for responding

lets

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicklea

When I sent the DSAR I asked for, Original Signed credit agreement, T&Cs for when the account was opened, the signed application form, and full transaction History, with a breakdown of all charges and PPI payments that where added.

 

got partial account history but not in an understandable form, no T&Cs only the latest as of 2010, no agreement no signed application just a copy of a blank one (which didnt mention PPI) so the bits i wanted i never actually got.

wrote and asked for the missing info and got told, we have complied with your request.

 

hope that sheds a bit more light on the subject for you.

 

 

ta for responding

lets

 

OK,

 

To start with, they don't have to provide anything with your signature on or actual copies of any original documents. Have a read of this thread to understand why-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?284049-SAR-and-RECONSTITUTED-AGREEMENTS

 

If they have sent you information that is not in an understandable form then I would suggest that you give them a call and ask for clarification. If that doesn't work then write to them and tell them that you will be issuing a court claim if they don't provide it.

 

If they haven't provided you with a copy of the original terms and if you took out PPI but it isn't included on the agreement that you received then what I would suggest you do depends on your circumstances.

 

If you are currently paying off this debt OK with noi problems then I will suggest one thing, if you're not currently paying it off then I will suggest something else. As I said above, it all depends.

 

If you are curretnly paying off your debt and you want to make a claim for mis sold PPI then, again, I would suggest that you give them a call and tell them that your statements show that you've been paying PPI so it must have been on the original agreement and you want to see a correct version. If there's no luck with that - again write to them and threaten them with court.

 

If you have not been paying this debt then I would suggest that you make a request for these things under s77/78 CCA. Their failure to respond properly will then be a defence if/when they take you to court.

 

Trouble is I don't know what your situation is - I can only guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

I wrote to cabot last week sending £1 for the CCA, just got a letter back, they say they do not have this information, however they have requested it under section 77/78 from the OC, they should be able to supply this within 12 days.

 

interesting,

 

any advice please.

 

ta lets

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

I wrote to cabot last week sending £1 for the CCA, just got a letter back, they say they do not have this information, however they have requested it under section 77/78 from the OC, they should be able to supply this within 12 days.

 

interesting,

 

any advice please.

 

ta lets

 

It's just a waiting game.... but one that's now in your favour. Let's see what happens :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

AN UPDATE

since my post last year,this account has now been past to cabot, i have started a couple of threads with different subjects but to do with the same thing,

they can be found here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?302729-Is-It-Possible-to-go-to-County-Court-To-Get-Paperwork-from-OC&highlight=letsgetitsorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well today it has arrived, a credit agreement that bears my signature, although they have`nt signed it, trying to read it,is proving a little hard though.

it also says on there we need this information before we can proceed with your application,

 

shall post up once got it scanned

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Well this week showed the delivery of

1) all statements going back to account instigation - interesting reading, the interest rate went up on 2 occasions in the first year, no notification of rise.

the only notification was when it went up from 48% to 54% this was mid 2009

2) an illegible copy of the signed application/credit agreement (attached no signature from OC)

3)2 sets of terms and conditions, 1 readable and the other not readable both of which do not relate to when the account was instigated

 

wasnt bad as i only asked for them 18 months ago- and had over £600 in charges and fees added in the first 6 months while i waited.

 

now without the notification of interest rate rises, can a claim be made along with the charges and fees as they have broken the agreement themselves by not notifying me of the changes.

 

any suggestions all welcome

 

ta for looking

 

Lets

edited agre.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is not legible, then it may have come from microfiche records. What you're after is clarification (under CPUTR 2008) that they do indeed have the original; not a copy of a copy that's been shrunk onto microfiche. Other than that, it doesn't appear to be properly executed if unsigned by the OC..... although this hasn't stopped companies from pursuing legal action.

 

Two points to raise though, if you're going down the CCA route.

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is not legible, then it may have come from microfiche records. What you're after is clarification (under CPUTR 2008) that they do indeed have the original; not a copy of a copy that's been shrunk onto microfiche. Other than that, it doesn't appear to be properly executed if unsigned by the OC..... although this hasn't stopped companies from pursuing legal action.

 

Two points to raise though, if you're going down the CCA route.

 

:-)

 

Looks like there might be a stamp with a date on it on the right hand side although it could just be a fly caught between the two pieces of glass when copied from fiche to be honest :-)

 

...but I digress, the point I'm trying to make is that a stamp with a date and initials or name will suffice as the lenders "signature" or at least its been held in court that such a mark is sufficient

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...