Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer witholding my items and charging for PPE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My former employer is witholding my items and claiming I have not returned my workwear and issued me an ivoice for over £1000

 

I went off sick last year and left all my personal and company belongings in the works vehicle and intended to go back after i was better, Following an operation I had to resign my post and asked to return my workwear and collect my belongings .

 

They are now claiming I have not returned all my workwear (which I have) and want me to pay £1100 to cover the cost of my PPE equipment which is over 2yrs old and now claim not to have any of my belongings and tools worth £900 which in a previous letter they acknowledged that I could collect them

 

They also have not sent my P45 despite resigning in November HMRC can confirm no P45 received and employer claims its been sent and that I am lying. They are now taking me to court for the cost of items they have , work colleagues can confirm employer is in posession of items but are too scared to speak out in fear of losing their job.

 

Can they withold my belongings ?

Can they charge me for PPE (even though they have them)?

 

Any Help Gratefully Received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you provided with a written statement of the terms and conditions of employment when you started your job?

If you did, did it make any reference to your employer having the right to withold your possessions, or that you had to compensate them for the cost of your PPE?

Did you sign a receipt when you received your PPE?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes signed a receipt but some of the items being claimed arent on the list.

 

It says return of property on termination of contract which happened

 

Deductions from pay on termination to cover overpayment or any other money due from you nothing about my belongings is mentioned.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I sent what I had (work trousers t shirts jumpers etc) recorded delivery so have that and they acknowledge what I sent back but they are claimng for all my PPE which always remains in the van and was never taken from work Basically I left my tools and other personal belongings and the PPE in the van as I only thought I would be off work a few days but turned out I needed an operation and 5 months off work I was unable to return to the job. They now say my tools nd equipment was taken home bymyself on my last day and that I also took all my PPE I returned my workwear as this was all I took home (Uniform). but In a letter prior to this they mention arrangements for me to return workwear and collect my belongings now they claim not to have them !

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are trying to they have given me until friday to Pay £1100 inc vat for my PPE which they have and is 2 years old ! otherwise CC will start The prices of the itemised PPE Is absolutely over the top a secondhand screwdriver that they aquired without paying for and are now charging me £34.23 !!! 2 items are being claimed for which I borrowed for 1 day in order to take part in a training course and returned to them and they want £123.48 for the 2 items , One good thing is that I left my briefcase which they claim not have but inside the case are certificates with serial numbers so the governing body will confirm if any certificates have been issued after my leaving date which will confirm that they have the item ! ALso they Owe me 15 days holiday pay and work it out to be £150 I was earnng £26000 PA and wont give me a breakdown of how they came to this figure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes major inflated prices? YEs they have a greviance with me as my operation was as a result of an accident in work that required an operation and resulted in me having to give up my job . No real idea on the letter any pointers would be really appreciated Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Just for loss of earning for when I was off for the period until I was able to return to some form of work which I explained to them as I was only getting SSP and no other income. I went off sick thinking it was something minor and left all items in the van thinking i'd be back in a few days after so long off work and the operation not being as sucessful as it should I had no option but to claim for loss of earnings Didnt want to do it but have a family to feed and support.

 

Thank you very much for your help :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sparky236,

 

when, I did my CSCS test it stated in the training book that the employer has to purchase PPE for their employees. I have tried goggle it but have only come up with the following links;

 

PPE - Personal Protective Equipment - Compensation Claim Advice

 

Management of Health and Safety at Work | Six Pack Regulations | Award Health & Safety Ltd

 

I would try the HSE website if you quot the correct law to your employer they should put up or shut up!

 

I think, I have found it try the link below;

 

HSE Web Communities - Construction Discussion Forum - PPE

 

I wish you the best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return of Property

It just says I need to return all compnay equipment on termination of employment , nothing about paying for unreturned items

 

Deductions from pay

at any time during or on termination of employment you owe your employer money under this contract or otherwise you agree and authorise your employer to deduct the sum or sums from any payment due to youwether wages salary payment of anykind , this will cover for example deductions from wages, expenses repayment of loans cost of damage caused by you or any other money due from you to employer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return of Property

It just says I need to return all compnay equipment on termination of employment , nothing about paying for unreturned items

 

Deductions from pay

at any time during or on termination of employment you owe your employer money under this contract or otherwise you agree and authorise your employer to deduct the sum or sums from any payment due to youwether wages salary payment of anykind , this will cover for example deductions from wages, expenses repayment of loans cost of damage caused by you or any other money due from you to employer

They have a signed copy of this?

It states that they can make deductions from any money owing, but nothing about you having to make payments to them then.

 

Ok, you need to send them a letter.

 

So, address it to the MD.

Write a brief narrative of the events that have occured.

State that contrary to their claim, you have returned all PPE you had in your possession, and any other PPE was contained in the works vehicle, which is in their possession.

State that you require that they drop any accusation that you are liable to reimburse them for the cost of the PPE they are claiming, and that they are contravening Section 15 of The Employment Rights Act 1996 by making such demands. As such, they have no prospect of successfully bringing any claim against you.

 

Then state that by depriving you of your possessions that were in the works vehicle when you resigned they are commiting an act of theft. Give them a time scale (7 days?) to contact you in order to arrange the return of your possessions. State that if they fail to do this, you will make all neccessary criminal complaints and civil applications to recover your property.

Print Letter Before Action across the top of the letter. Send it by recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in that case, would it have been insured against theft?

 

I know I'm ignorant, but can someone enlighten me on what PPE means please?

 

HB

 

PPE is Personal Protective Equipment. Usually Hi-Vis vest, boots, hard hat, goggles, gloves, mask etc but can be anything required to do your job safely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in that case, would it have been insured against theft?

 

I know I'm ignorant, but can someone enlighten me on what PPE means please?

 

HB

 

PPE Personal Protective Equipment i.e gloves , helmet hiviz jackets , saftety glasses etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have a signed copy of my contract and so do I , So I am right in saying that because they dont mention that I have to repay the cost of PPE then they cant charge me for ??

 

Letter looks good thanks Elpulpo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...