Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We don't know of anyone on this forum who has had RLP organisations or bailiffs arrive at the door. They're going to threaten legal action because they think you may not know that they aren't able to carry this out and could be more likely to pay them. HB
    • Has anyone that you have known or posted on this forum received knocks on doors from them or received a ccj and been sent to court or have sent bailiffs or gave the debt to another company. if they don’t have any legal powers why do they threaten with court action 
    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help With The CSA!!!!


ananya
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My sister has recently been awarded just under £60 a week for maintenance for her 12 year old son, after her useless ex shirked his responsibilities for 7 years and paid her nothing. However, despite them assuring her that the first payment he made of the arrears he owed would be in her bank account by last week, they have now informed her that no such payment has been issued. Her income support reduces right down to £13 a week from this week and she has nothing, other than a pathetic amount of child tax credit, coming in.

 

The CSA are holding on to this money, just under £170 and are taking her benefits away, so what can she do?

 

She has obviously got upset and is worried that she has nothing to live on, the CSA obviously couldn't give a flying you-know-what about it and just give her the stock answer of 'it'll take 7 - 10 working days', no matter what the question is.

 

Is there anything she can do?

 

Help much appreciated as I have no idea!

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's really helpful and I'm sure she'll appreciate your advice.

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CSA are a law unto themselves and the very people they are supposed to help ie: the children are the ones that lose out the most.

 

I've been doing battle with them for years over my maintenance. And as other people say amicable agreements direct with the NRP are usually the best option, but as you'd expect for some of us its just NOT an option.

 

The CSA... she has to call them daily, literally. I did. I still do when they're peeing me around. Last month they told me 4-6 weeks to work out a payment they were withholding. I called them daily, and they did it in 7 days.

 

As to the here and now, obviously harass the CSA, but in the meantime approach the Benefits Agency and explain that she's getting NO maintenance currently. Push them to call the CSA, and get them to fax etc proof that she's not receiving it for now. They may adjust her IS or be able to offer a crisis loan to tide her over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rachie, that's much appreciated. I am worried for her, she's had to put up with enough, as so many have, without having to fight for what is hers.

 

I'll pass on your words and hopefully she'll have some luck.

 

Thanks again :)

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CSA are able to make odd payments to recompense for calls etc btw. Tell her to say she WILL be looking to recover the costs of having to call them so regularly and let them know that she KNOWS they can do this. Its obviously NOT something they voluntarily tell you.

 

Also, she can email a complaint in, worth doing so if the problem is ongoing she can involve ICE and her MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only just found out about ICE for her, just yesterday as she's tried e-mailing the CSA to complain and got no-where.

 

I'll pass on your second post to her too and thanks again.

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
If its any comfort from 12th April all Child Maintenance will be disregarded in full by DWP when calculating entitlement to means tested benefits so there will be no deductions made from your sisters Income Support.

 

 

Am i right in saying, from 27 October 2008, the Section 6 rule kicks in and the parent with care is entitled to her benefit award and her child maintenance payments in full, prior to this if the child maintenance was higher than the benefit award the parent with care was only entitled to £10.00 CMP(Child Maintenance Premium).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am i right in saying, from 27 October 2008, the Section 6 rule kicks in and the parent with care is entitled to her benefit award and her child maintenance payments in full, prior to this if the child maintenance was higher than the benefit award the parent with care was only entitled to £10.00 CMP(Child Maintenance Premium).

 

Not quite. From 27th October 2008, a parent with care began to get their child support paid directly to them and got to keep all of their child support if it was £20 or below per week. Anything over this sum would affect their entitlement to Income based benefit fro DWP, and the responsibility became that of the PWC to inform the benefit section if they received more than £20 of maintenence in any benefit week.

 

The disregard of child support you mention from 27th October 2008 only applied to Housing Benefit and Council Tax benefit, not to DWP benefits such as Income Support.

 

Prior to that, yes the sum that the PWC on benefit would receive would be £10 maximum child suuport.

 

The full disregard for all DWP benefits such as Income Support did not come into effect until 12th April, where the PWC on benefit can retain all of their benefit plus all of their child support.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...