Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiff for Business Rates help please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi my fiend reccomended I come here.I'm hoping someone may be able to help me?

 

I run a small pet shop and the business has been really struggling. This is my first year of business. I messed up and didnt pay my business rates for last year. The council sent me a couple of letters but it went to the flat above who has the same number as my shop but my shop is A on the end. I got a letter from a bailiff last week saying i owed 425.00. I was going to call to sort it out but had a close family bereavement so have been caught up with that.

 

Today my fiancee rang to say the bailiff was there and was going to take everything. I spoke to him and explained why i hadnt called and asked if he could give me until Tuesday as I needed to go to the council to ask about small business relief. he said it was too late for that, he debt was now at 1110.40 and unless he had 277.00 within the next 20 minutes and agreement for a paymanet plan he would start removing things from the shop.

 

I couldnt afford 277 so he agreed to take 200. i paid the money and agreed 80.00 per month over the phone. I can afford this so am ok with the monthyl payments but he said he would do it only if i gave permission for my fiance to sign the posession agreement so i did.

 

the bailiff has listed all of the products and shelving including little platic baskets but not the freezer which i thought was odd but not moaning about.

 

i have a couple of questions:

 

firstly the agreement says if i dont pay he will come and take everything on the list so I dont see how i can now sell them to customers?

 

also the charges, the council confirmed the outstanding balance as 1001.00. he has added 24.50 first visit fee, 18.00 second visit 54.00 levy charge 12.00 walking posession fee and 24.50 admin fee.

 

Is this right? how can i sell my products to make money if he now posses them?

 

im so confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Tink,

 

1) Count yourself lucky The £80 a month is unusually reasonable for business rates so i (personaly) wouldn't 'rock the boat' on this one until it's paid off.

 

2) The charges are (unusually) correct other than the £24.50 admin fee. I would wait until the very end of your arrangement to challenge this and I'm sure it will disappear. They know they are trying it on.

 

3) As for selling the stock - WOW! that IS a question. I've never thought of that before, and believe me I've done a lot of thinking on this subject!!

 

Technically you are correct. The stock now belongs to the bailiff and it is a criminal offense to sell it. However, this situation will have applied to any business that has been subject to a levy, all of whom carry on trading as normal. Indeed the bailiff wants you to carry on trading - he wants the money, not your stock.

 

You obviously need to carry on trading by selling the stock, and i've never heard of anyone getting into trouble for doing that - so get on with it!

 

The technicality you have thrown up is VERY interesting, i hope someone on here has got the answer or I'm going to have to research this until i find out.

 

Just remember to pay early , preferably by card, and get a receipt (online) or transaction number (over the phone). This is important because if you are 1 day late they will turn up with a van and charge you hundreds of pounds!!

 

If you send cheques they might mysteriously not get cashed in time and the van could turn up!

 

You've been treated OK as it goes.

 

Good luck with your business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A common strategy which is commonplace amongst bailiffs is that although they have taken possession of the goods they allow the business to trade so long as they are replaced. This is clearly what the Bailiff has done. You must keep to your replacement schedule to ensure the Bailiff doesnt return and seize the goods for sale at an auction.On the fee scale I would question the 2nd visit fee if he only attended once.On the subject of the commercial refrigerator/ freezer, they sell for very little and if they fail to sell at auction the Bailiff will have to pay for the disposal fee, as it is hazardous to the environment.

Provider of case history to encourage adherence of the High Court Enforcement Regulations 2004.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where distress is levied upon a trading business, the stock and materials seized under a walking possession agreement, must be sold by the firm. Technically if the business sold the goods they would breach the walking possession agreement, and to allow it would be "abandonment2 by the bailiff.The normal solution is to allow the the trader to sell the seized goods as long as they are replaced. To avoid abandonment the bailiff should note on the inventory that the stock will change and that this has been agreed with the debtor. Regular visits must be made to check that the quantity of goods still remains the same. For this paractice to work the Bailiff must either seize more goods to replace the sold stock OR take seize the money taken from the sale of the former levied stock. This practice would not be used to levy for Distress. A case file showing this as sanctioned practice by the courts is Dalton ex p Herrington 7 Carmichael vTrustee [1963] CH336.Abandonment by the bailiff cannot be proved in cases where there is an arrangement in place. There is case law to support this: Any sort of agreement or arrangement with the debtor is likely to be evidence of impounding contrary to a claim of abandonment (Anderson v Henry[1898] 29 OR 719.

Edited by Fair&Balanced

Provider of case history to encourage adherence of the High Court Enforcement Regulations 2004.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this guys. tobe honest he was really nice (or seemed so) on the phone. He aske how business was and said-honestly, how is the busines doing. i said really badly got hardly anything in the bank. so he said he would take 100 per month. i asked him to let me pay the 200 today and the other 77 with the 1st payment of 80 next month and he said that as he had just been saying to my partner how reasonable a bailiff he is, that he should be now and said pay me 200 today and just 80.00 a month.

 

sounds like i may have spoken to the only decent bailiff on the earth?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this guys. tobe honest he was really nice (or seemed so) on the phone. He aske how business was and said-honestly, how is the busines doing. i said really badly got hardly anything in the bank. so he said he would take 100 per month. i asked him to let me pay the 200 today and the other 77 with the 1st payment of 80 next month and he said that as he had just been saying to my partner how reasonable a bailiff he is, that he should be now and said pay me 200 today and just 80.00 a month.

 

sounds like i may have spoken to the only decent bailiff on the earth?!

 

Beware the smiling assassin! First foot you put wrong and Bob certainly won't be your uncle.

 

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PlodderTom. Very good advice! I will be careful.

 

He said its better an quiker to pay over the phone each month. He said it does incurr a 1.50 charge each time but you dont run the risk of cheques not getting there etc. bit cheeky charging i think but dont want to risk the chque getting there late.

 

reading through, it seems he would sell stuff at auction. How much would he make on dog treats? just seems weird but i guess they just have to levy on whatever is there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi my fiend reccomended I come here.I'm hoping someone may be able to help me?

 

I run a small pet shop and the business has been really struggling. This is my first year of business. I messed up and didnt pay my business rates for last year. The council sent me a couple of letters but it went to the flat above who has the same number as my shop but my shop is A on the end. I got a letter from a bailiff last week saying i owed 425.00. I was going to call to sort it out but had a close family bereavement so have been caught up with that.

 

Today my fiancee rang to say the bailiff was there and was going to take everything. I spoke to him and explained why i hadnt called and asked if he could give me until Tuesday as I needed to go to the council to ask about small business relief. he said it was too late for that, he debt was now at 1110.40 and unless he had 277.00 within the next 20 minutes and agreement for a paymanet plan he would start removing things from the shop.

 

I couldnt afford 277 so he agreed to take 200. i paid the money and agreed 80.00 per month over the phone. I can afford this so am ok with the monthyl payments but he said he would do it only if i gave permission for my fiance to sign the posession agreement so i did.

 

the bailiff has listed all of the products and shelving including little platic baskets but not the freezer which i thought was odd but not moaning about.

 

i have a couple of questions:

 

firstly the agreement says if i dont pay he will come and take everything on the list so I dont see how i can now sell them to customers?

 

also the charges, the council confirmed the outstanding balance as 1001.00. he has added 24.50 first visit fee, 18.00 second visit 54.00 levy charge 12.00 walking posession fee and 24.50 admin fee.

 

Is this right? how can i sell my products to make money if he now posses them?

 

im so confused

 

baliff can only charge 2nd visit fee if he has been twice, who signed the walk in possession order, how did your £425 debt get up to £1100 in a week without excess baliff fee's ???

 

the baliff has to show authirisation from council etc... to debtor, the council will be showing £1100 on their baliff account because the baliff has probably loaded the fee's with removal van etc that has not been used yet, if you can give me more info then i can point you in the right direction, if your liability order from the council is for £425 then the baliff fees have been loaded and the council dont realise the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PlodderTom. Very good advice! I will be careful.

 

He said its better an quiker to pay over the phone each month. He said it does incurr a 1.50 charge each time but you dont run the risk of cheques not getting there etc. bit cheeky charging i think but dont want to risk the chque getting there late.

 

reading through, it seems he would sell stuff at auction. How much would he make on dog treats? just seems weird but i guess they just have to levy on whatever is there?

 

they cant levy on whatever is there, i am not sure about stock, i have read something somewhere but need to check it out...... you MUST ask the baliff for a breakdown of charges and if there is something called enforcement fee than that dont exist and he is blagging you for more cash, your fee's should be less than £100 but they make their money by scaruing people and no one challenges them, you need to ask for the fee breakdown urgently

Link to post
Share on other sites

£425 to £1100

 

I'm confused by that as well. I assumed given that the fees have been itemized and aren't that excessive that the £425 was a mistake.

 

The levy fee correlates to a LO for around £1000.

 

£425 would be way to low for business rates on a shop - unless he's paid half of it already.

 

Perhaps Tink could clarify or contact the council to find out.

 

I'm sure they can do stock westgarth, but not if you haven't paid for it i.e it's on account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he said he would only enter into payment arrangement and not take all of my stock in the next 20 minutes if i authorised my fiance to sign the WPA for me. I was really worried so I did. i couldnt get there as I was over an hour away. I checked with council via phone and they said it was at 1001 when it left them which i dont understand as the 1st bailiff letter said 425.

 

i asked him to leave a breakdown of charges and they are as written above.

Thats what is written on the form. He said he didnt get a signature, he would just take things anyway.

 

without stock, i would have to close down and would still be liable for rent etc which i wouldnt be able to afford so jut did what he said

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that. I dont think im going to argue it too much> 80.00 is actually lower than the origional required by the council, Having said that I didnt have small business relief added.

 

I have just been checking through some other posts and theres one from beyong hope. someone on there has said if your disputing the amount and/or applying for relief they shouldnt pursue distrss. can anyone clarify?

 

mind you, dont want to annoy them and loose my stuff!

 

thanks for all your help guys. Its a horrible scary thing, Its great to know there is somewhere to go other than the CAB that although is helpful, you can harldy ever get an appointment at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been checking through some other posts and theres one from beyong hope. someone on there has said if your disputing the amount and/or applying for relief they shouldnt pursue distrss. can anyone clarify?

 

The Bailiff can keep enforcing at all times unless the employing authority asks them to put things on hold or cancels the action.

 

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news on this years NNDR.

 

My local authority has sent out letters stating that 100% relief will apply to businesses with £6000 or less RV, starting in October, for one year. (subject to parliamentary approval)

 

They will not suspend enforcement as PT says, but i pray you still qualify for last years small business relief (usually 50%)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think im going to strugle. couldnt really afford it in the first place. I will go down the council offices Tuesday. The bailiff said if the grant retrospective discount, they will email the bailiff and it willl come off of the total.

 

reading through i think its not anywhere need as bad an outcome as i could have had!

 

some people have had an awful time.

 

makes me feel silly really putting it on here now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help everyone.

 

I hope you all have a good easter and a Baillif free one at that!

 

I'll update this with how i get on at the council.

 

Everyones help is very much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

did the baliff comply to this part of the regulation ?

 

" The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 3 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into."

 

The main part of this above regulation for me is the word debtor, if anyone other than the debtor can sign the walking possession order then the baliff could stop someone in the street, a customer on the premises etc and get them to sign, and surely its not that simple - or is it Mr High Court Officer ?

 

I would say that the baliff can levy distress without anyone being there but not just anyone can sign the possession order - thinking about it if that was the case that anyone can sign then the baliffs would bring along muppet number 2 who just happened to be there at the time to act as the signiture man?????

 

you definatley need to get absolute clarification from the council as to the exact amount of the debt, if it is £1100 then the charges are about right, but the baliff office should send you an itemised breakdown of cost not just hand written on the bottom of a piece of paper by a numpty who's incentive is to make as much money out of you as possible.

 

I would say that if you as the debtor didnt sign the possession order it aint legal.... anyone got an exact answer plzz

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think im going to strugle. couldnt really afford it in the first place. I will go down the council offices Tuesday. The bailiff said if the grant retrospective discount, they will email the bailiff and it willl come off of the total.

 

reading through i think its not anywhere need as bad an outcome as i could have had!

 

some people have had an awful time.

 

makes me feel silly really putting it on here now.

 

i think they will give backdated discount, they are always behind anyway and i am sure that in the past few years i have had it backdated, not by a year though but definatley from the beggining of the acount year so do it quick..

 

please keep me informed for future reference

 

happy easter

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff fees are wrong, he cannot charge for a visit and a levy on the same day.

 

This is what he can charge.

 

First visit fee: £24.50 This is for a first attendance to levy, but where a levy does not takes place.

The bailiff can charge a levy fee if they levy, but he cannot charge both amounts on the same occasion.

 

Second visit fee: £18.00

Despite any further visits, the bailiff can only charge for a maximum of 2 visits.

If its the first time he has been then he cannot charge you for the 2nd visit,

so the most he can charge is the levy fee, and WPO.

 

The are not allowed to take 'white goods', hence why he didnt levy on the freezer, but as your a business its always a gray area with what they can and cannot levy,

 

So take off the 1st and 2nd fee plus the admin fee and what is left is what you should be paying in fees.

I would write and complain to the council that the bailiff is trying to over charge you by £68.00 in unlawful fee's.

Make sure he has not excessively levied either, what he should of done is levied on stock to the amount of the debt plus his fees plus removal cost (about£150.00) plus auction cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Tink, seanamarts is right about the Levy and visit fee on the same visit - i missed that.

 

If there was only ever one visit i.e the one where he levied, then yes both visit fees should be removed.

 

Like i say, it would probably be wiser to kick up a fuss at the end ( the last payment). I wouldn't mess with the most generous business rates installment arrangement in history for £68 at this point.

 

Just my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The are not allowed to take 'white goods', hence why he didnt levy on the freezer, but as your a business its always a gray area with what they can and cannot levy,

 

.

 

Its a business so they can. A freezer is not "exempt goods" for a trading business. The environmental disposal payment following it not selling at auction would be the reason.

Provider of case history to encourage adherence of the High Court Enforcement Regulations 2004.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...