Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How can I get my money back


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I really hope someone can help me here. I've been to so many places and nobody has ever got back to me.

 

Around 2 & half years ago I loaned my sister & her then-husband some money because their's had been stolen. They were on holiday so it had to be done via Western Union. By my standards it was quite a substantial amount out of mine & my girlfriend's wedding fund. I verbally advised them that it would be loaned on the condition it was paid back within 8 weeks. They said that it would be ok because they would claim on "his" travel insurance. I transferred the money to them and re-iterated that it was not a gift but a loan and that it "must" be repaid. Because I was a new customer with Western Union they would not let me transfer the full amount myself. They did say that I could however transfer half myself & transfer the other half to another family member's bank account (my mum's in this case) so that the rest could be sent. This was done, and both transfers were successful. I still have the receipts.

 

Here's out it is now.....we haven't been paid a single penny, they split up 18months ago, and "he" refuses to accept any responsibility for sorting it out despite his assurances that he told us he he would sort it before and after they separated. :-x.

 

My sister has spoken to him on several occasions in an attempt to move it along, but he still does not co-operate. We have asked him verbally, by text, e-mail, and all we got was excuse after excuse saying that the insurance company had lost his claim. We even sent a demand by Special Delivery (with a copy sent by email to ensure he gets it) which he did not pick up from the Post Office.

 

My question is....can we issue legal proceedings against him only, even though the money was loaned to them as a couple. Afterall he was going to resolve the issue himself but it appears he has adopted the "head in the sand" position and is hoping it will go away.

 

If we can are there any cases that we can use should this matter proceed through the Small Claims Track.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

It will be their joint responsability, and quite rightly so. At best, you'll only be able to get 1/2 from him, since they were a couple at the time. Whether you decide to pursue your sister or not is up to you, but it is ridiculous to expect him to pay for both of them when they both borrowed the money, both used during the holiday, regardless of whether they split up afterwards or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am affraid to say it but from what you have said it sounds like it would simply be a case of his word against yours. You would say it was a loan, he could say it was a gift and so on and so forth. I certainly agree with Bookworm, the most you could hope for from him would be half the amount of the loan.

 

My best advice to you would be to consult a solicitor on this matter - knowing that he owes you the money is one thing, proving it in the county court could be quite another.

 

Best Regards,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try and get your money back but it does fall on him to answer the papers and everything.

 

It is going to be a case of your word against his but if he is not likely to answer the papers then u could get your money back if he does not respond.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I don't think it is your word against his, as you have numerous messages from him explaining that he cannot pay you back yet as his insurance have not sorted him out yet. That in itself says that he at least acknowledges the debt (presuming they were text messages and you have still got them on your/your sisters phone).

 

Also, I would think a court would say that if it was a gift, then why wouldn't you have gave it to them before they left for their holiday. I presume the fact that you are not pursuing your sister is because you are talking to her and everything with her is fine. If so, then she should act as witness and say they borrowed the money from you.

 

You will have to pay some court fees up front (amount depends on amount you are claiming), but he should be liable for them after the case. However, as said above, you can only claim half from him.

 

 

Where's Judge Judy when you need her?:p

 

 

Hope you sort it out.

Edited by SOD'EM

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel I must follow up on the most recent post.

 

Firstly, the text messages would need to specifically refer to the debt in question, otherwise it could be to do with paying money back for anything. Even then, the text messages are only really supportive evidence. Remember, you would have to prove that the phone was owned and the messages sent by your sister's former partner.

 

Secondly, your sister would not be a credible witness as she is not impartial in the matter and it is extremely unlikely that the judge would allow her to be a witness in the case for that reason.

 

In summary, banks can sometimes fail to enforce debts if there are discrepencies in the original credit agreement. Therefore, based on the evidence you have I would venture that your chances are slim. Your sister's former partner could put together a pretty sound defence which could leave you with a liability for his costs and a loss of your costs for court fees.

 

Personally, I'd write it off if I was you but the decision is yours.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...