Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

makenzie hall, cabot debt advice pls


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

time line

02/03 student in notts cred card/ student bank account, ran away from it , debt problems so on and so forth

2002 approx credit card/ bank debt run up barclay card.....(different or seperate? accumilated debt as both barclays. will clear up later)

 

a few years later i accept the debt with a company called aktiv capital, paying it off however much per month,

 

about a year ago I get it all paid off aktiv, letter to confirm it

 

a letter from makenzie hall about an urgent matter ( my address)

a call to my old address, parents home

 

then a text ( my number) of similar and a missed call

 

both with a ref number ( put the ref number in their website and it says call them for a pin number and it seems clear not to call them)

 

now today a voice mail message

 

so I sent a letter from my address with my address, as suggested, i know of no debt so on so forth.....

a letter goes to my parents, " we have ref back to our clients we do not have the debt but will get back to you

a couple of days later a letter agin to parents address, its for barclay card 800 quid, bought from cabot. from notts address, traced me to my addrss( not my parents)

also stated they have included onbusman info ( not included)

so what is the next step?

were the credit and bank seperate even though both barclays, if accumulated then ive got the letter to prove ive paid aktiv if seperate aktiv is still paid and the other is over 6 years, statute barred?

ive never been contacted about this debt before if it is a different one

 

are they trying to baffle and confuse with the addresses? I mean if it want my parents I would never have got these letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mhall are probably baffling themselves - it doesn't take a lot really.

 

If you want to sort it out write to Mhall, never, ever call them, and tell them to provide proof the debt is owed and see what they come up with. It probably won't be a great deal and if the matter is paid up and you still have the letter then its game over. Ask MHall for details of their complaints procedure. This will both save a stamp and show Mhall that you know your rights and they could be on the wrong end of an FOS investigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mhall are probably baffling themselves - it doesn't take a lot really.

 

If you want to sort it out write to Mhall, never, ever call them, and tell them to provide proof the debt is owed and see what they come up with. It probably won't be a great deal and if the matter is paid up and you still have the letter then its game over. Ask MHall for details of their complaints procedure. This will both save a stamp and show Mhall that you know your rights and they could be on the wrong end of an FOS investigation.

 

so, in short

 

get them to prove some specifics, amounts rates, interest etc?

 

if its the one ive never touched then a stat barred letter, if the one ive paid then the letter from aktiv?

 

any good stencils per chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

An update

 

3 years ago I got some help with an old credit card debt here

 

02/03 student ran up some credit card debt

 

a letter from makenzie hall about an urgent matter ( my address)

a call to my old address, parents

 

 

They proved to me what the debt was however it turned out to be statute barred and Mackenzie hall stopped bothering me.

 

Now 3 years later Cabot have been calling my parents house , who have denied my existence , Cabot have said they will be taken off the records however they have continued to call. Now today I've got a letter from them ( at my parents address, not mine) telling me to clear the debt. Obviously I'm not going to call them as it must still be statute barred right? However if I start some sort of process to sort this out I will not only be admitting that ie been in touch with my parents to get the info but equally I don't want them to get harassed either. Have Cabot just bought an even further statute barred debt off mak hall ?

 

Any help would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very much sounds like it. The debt buyers have been buying a ton of old debts lately. Dont write to them. Simply tell your parents to mark it return to sender, and if they try and telephone, get full and formal complaints going. You dont live there and there is no reason whatsoever for your parents to tell them where you have gone.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much yup. Make sure the complaint clearly states "Formal complaint" at the top, and you include a note that states should they contact that address any more, then harassment proceedings will be started in the local county court and full complaints will be made to the OFT and FOS with a comment about their fitness to hold a credit licence.

 

If your parents play hardball from the start, these silly company will soon run back under their rock.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one thing, I'm slightly concerned that in the correspondence they will be trying to arrange some sort of unpleasant visit that will go unseen. Obviously we can't return the first letter as it was opened thinking it was normal post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, your parents need to play hardball. get that clause added where if ANYONE comes, they will be forcibly removed and the police will be called.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only the OC can add the debt. If they didnt and the new owner tries to, they could be in trouble. The new owner can only update the debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Templates arent really useful for a complaint. Your parents simply need to say that the person in question does not live at the address, nor do they know where you live nor do they have contact details.

 

Repeated attempts to communicate with the address or people living there will be considered harassment and they will not hesitate to take further action including legal. Should the DCA choose to send any representative to the house, they will be denied entry and will be removed using any means necessary and the police will be called.

 

Keep it short, simple and straight to the point. Don't play soft with them, tell them in no uncertain terms what will happen if they continue to harass.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just send the statute barred letter, amended to say that your parents have forwarded the letter on (give your new address) and point out that the statute barred status of the debt has already been advised, so they need to stop or you will report them to the OFT.

 

There is no harm giving your new address. They can't do anything unless you have made a payment within the last 6 years or sent a letter admitting to the debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to add, your parents must also make a full complaint with the OFT. They also need to log the date and times any contact is made from the DCA to them, no matter what format of communication it is.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm rather tempted to hae them warned away from my parents address and if they really want to continue to persue me on s debt that's about 9 or 10 years old. I'm not going to afford them the luxury of giving them my information

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure to check all 3 agencies just to be sure. DCA's will go after SB debts or bad debts until you tell them otherwise. However, i still think getting your parents to send in a Full and firm complaint will stop the contact. Unless you really want to give them your current info.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a little up date, parents sent a letter to cabot with all of the above suggested info . They have written back saying they will investigate further cand upon their findings write again.

 

Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What info did they send? If its statute barred, chances are these muppets will simply sell the debt on.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you need to issue full and formal complaints with them AND the regulators.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...