Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's fine.  The important thing is to show Kev you're trouble and so best to drop you like a hot potato. Invest in a 2nd class stamp tomorrow - all Kev is worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
    • lolerz, many thanks for your reply and correcting my big mistake, oh dear start again. They sent the section 48 along with the Form NO 6A, it was sitting on top of the paperwork, sorry about that. SO they have sent me a Form No 6A and i have received the court paperwork with the claim form and defence paperwork.    
    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Small Claim against Argos


saitken
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wish to make a small claim against Argos for breach of the Sale of Goods Act (goods not as advertised). The value of the product is £75.

Can I also claim back the cost of making the claim using MoneyOnline? If so, how do I legally express this on my Claim form? Am I entitled to any further compensation for, for example, the amount of time I have had to spend administering my complaint?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us the story first please

we do have very good relations with them here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The story is as follows. I purchased the Sky 'Pay Forever' Digital TV package from Argos last year. It cost a one-off payment of £75. No contract. For this you get a Sky man who comes over and installs the dish and a basic Sky set-top box. For the first 4 months, you get the basic Sky channels for free and then after the 4 month period, the packaging supplied with this product states that '..there will remain 200 free digital TV channels – that’s four times more than Freeview - which can be watched forever...and you can continue watching the free digital channels (including all the main Freeview channels).'

When I cancelled the start-up of the Direct Debit after the 4 month period, some of the promised Freeview channels were cancelled and are now not available and secondly I only have approximately 64 free channels in total, not the 'over 200' as promised.

I have complained to Argos requesting a refund on the basis that the goods are not as described but they have stated that the free channels included with this product are those from 'FreeSat' and hacve refused to give me a refund i.e. http://www/freesatfromsky.co.uk/freesat-tv-choice-all.aspx. However, this is not what is stated on the contract which refers to the 'main Freeview channels' not FreeSat.

Stewart

Link to post
Share on other sites

play on word me thinks and a rather silly use of the word frreview by argos p'haps.

 

there is no link between freeview/sky/freesat or even cable, for that matter.

how sky [whom i think are your real target here] can claim/use such words and thus p'haps confuse argos publicity material amazes me, but not unheard of.

now IF you skybox was a freesat box, you would get 200 as i do [well give or take] trouble is few are english..no only joking.

 

dont know what to suggest

and dont know if anyone or if anything CAN be done about this

 

try pinging buzby, he might know.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I not just make a Small Claim to Argos and state that the Sale of Goods Act has been breached since the 'goods are not a described'? The box specifically states that I will receive 'Freeview' channels however I have not received them all. Simple? Or am I missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeview is a trade name, not a description. If a shop claimed to always Hoover its carpets every morning (to alleviate problems for asthma sufferers) and it was discovered they actually used a Dyson - there would be no deception, just a (minor) misdescription.

 

Now, as to the problem - you actually purchased Sky's version of 'free TV' - which requires a DD (Why - if it's free?). Of course this is because Sky discount the price in order to hook you into their paiid service. If you do not, then they downgrade the service to what they are prepared to offer those cheapskate customers that don;t wish to pay them for their wonderful services. :)

 

Argos have no say in this - so whilst they sold the goods, SOGA covers these, but not WHAT you can receive, which is not under their control. Considering the channels available can and do change it would be a difficult task to insist the as an avid Men & Motors' viewer - and the only reason you bought the package, Argos could be liable if the channel ceased to broadcast.

 

As to your possible action - IF you win, you get your costs anyway (as the victor) however, if they challenge and defend, they get to have their (similarly capped) fees from you as the loser.

 

On the technical side, you can switch your receiver to view channels on FreeSat (nothing to do with Sky) and it doesn't need a viewing cards either, so you may get more - but the whole point of Sky restricting you is to make you feel you're missing out and must upgrade and pay for ongoing service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Q: I already have Sky digital satellite equipment - what else do I need?

 

A: All you need to gain access to the free channels available on the digital satellite platform is a Freesat from Sky viewing card, which costs just £25. If you’d like to access the interactive services available, you’ll also need a working phone line. To purchase a viewing card please phone Sky on 08448 244 400.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi buzby - How can I 'switch your receiver to view channels on FreeSat'?

 

THanks

 

Sky never tell you this, but FreeSat from BBC/ITV uses the same Astra Satellite constellation as Sky, but uses different frequencies. If you do a web each you'll find out the sneaky way to reconfigure the Sky menus to switch the channels and access the no-card alternative service.

 

The downside for some, is that there is no EPG data available (it will still show Sky's, and the data will be wrong, showing channels not transmitted). but it does sever the link with Sky completely, and no requirement for a card to be purchased.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...